Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović
{"title":"概率直觉推理的逻辑 ILP","authors":"Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović","doi":"10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form <span>\\(\\langle H, \\mu \\rangle \\)</span> that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though <i>H</i> needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) <span>\\(\\mu : H \\longrightarrow [0,1]_{\\mathbb {Q}}\\)</span> satisfies the following condition: if <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\beta \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\alpha \\wedge \\beta \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\alpha \\vee \\beta \\in H\\)</span>, then <span>\\(\\mu (\\alpha \\vee \\beta ) = \\mu (\\alpha ) + \\mu (\\beta ) - \\mu (\\alpha \\wedge \\beta )\\)</span>. Since the range of <span>\\(\\mu \\)</span> is the set <span>\\([0,1]_{\\mathbb {Q}}\\)</span> of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48979,"journal":{"name":"Studia Logica","volume":"228 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logic ILP for Intuitionistic Reasoning About Probability\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form <span>\\\\(\\\\langle H, \\\\mu \\\\rangle \\\\)</span> that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though <i>H</i> needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) <span>\\\\(\\\\mu : H \\\\longrightarrow [0,1]_{\\\\mathbb {Q}}\\\\)</span> satisfies the following condition: if <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\beta \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\wedge \\\\beta \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\vee \\\\beta \\\\in H\\\\)</span>, then <span>\\\\(\\\\mu (\\\\alpha \\\\vee \\\\beta ) = \\\\mu (\\\\alpha ) + \\\\mu (\\\\beta ) - \\\\mu (\\\\alpha \\\\wedge \\\\beta )\\\\)</span>. Since the range of <span>\\\\(\\\\mu \\\\)</span> is the set <span>\\\\([0,1]_{\\\\mathbb {Q}}\\\\)</span> of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Logica\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Logica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Logica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Logic ILP for Intuitionistic Reasoning About Probability
We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form \(\langle H, \mu \rangle \) that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though H needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) \(\mu : H \longrightarrow [0,1]_{\mathbb {Q}}\) satisfies the following condition: if \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), \(\alpha \wedge \beta \), \(\alpha \vee \beta \in H\), then \(\mu (\alpha \vee \beta ) = \mu (\alpha ) + \mu (\beta ) - \mu (\alpha \wedge \beta )\). Since the range of \(\mu \) is the set \([0,1]_{\mathbb {Q}}\) of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.
期刊介绍:
The leading idea of Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic, Philosophy and Mathematics was to investigate philosophical problems by means of rigorous methods of mathematics. Evidence of the great success the School experienced is the fact that it has become generally recognized as Polish Style Logic. Today Polish Style Logic is no longer exclusively a Polish speciality. It is represented by numerous logicians, mathematicians and philosophers from research centers all over the world.