概率直觉推理的逻辑 ILP

Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z
Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović
{"title":"概率直觉推理的逻辑 ILP","authors":"Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović","doi":"10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form <span>\\(\\langle H, \\mu \\rangle \\)</span> that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though <i>H</i> needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) <span>\\(\\mu : H \\longrightarrow [0,1]_{\\mathbb {Q}}\\)</span> satisfies the following condition: if <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\beta \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\alpha \\wedge \\beta \\)</span>, <span>\\(\\alpha \\vee \\beta \\in H\\)</span>, then <span>\\(\\mu (\\alpha \\vee \\beta ) = \\mu (\\alpha ) + \\mu (\\beta ) - \\mu (\\alpha \\wedge \\beta )\\)</span>. Since the range of <span>\\(\\mu \\)</span> is the set <span>\\([0,1]_{\\mathbb {Q}}\\)</span> of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logic ILP for Intuitionistic Reasoning About Probability\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Ilić-Stepić, Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Perović\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form <span>\\\\(\\\\langle H, \\\\mu \\\\rangle \\\\)</span> that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though <i>H</i> needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) <span>\\\\(\\\\mu : H \\\\longrightarrow [0,1]_{\\\\mathbb {Q}}\\\\)</span> satisfies the following condition: if <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\beta \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\wedge \\\\beta \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha \\\\vee \\\\beta \\\\in H\\\\)</span>, then <span>\\\\(\\\\mu (\\\\alpha \\\\vee \\\\beta ) = \\\\mu (\\\\alpha ) + \\\\mu (\\\\beta ) - \\\\mu (\\\\alpha \\\\wedge \\\\beta )\\\\)</span>. Since the range of <span>\\\\(\\\\mu \\\\)</span> is the set <span>\\\\([0,1]_{\\\\mathbb {Q}}\\\\)</span> of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10084-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们为概率推理的直观形式化提供了现有方法之外的另一种方法。就克里普克模型而言,每个可能的世界都有一个形式为 \(\langle H, \mu \rangle \)的结构,它不一定是一个概率空间。更确切地说,虽然H不一定是布尔代数,但相应的单调函数(我们称之为度量)\(\mu : H \longrightarrow [0,1]_{\mathbb {Q}}\) 满足以下条件:if \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), \(\alpha \wedge \beta \), \(\alpha \vee \beta \ in H\), then \(\mu (\alpha \vee \beta ) = \mu (\alpha ) + \mu (\beta ) - \mu (\alpha \wedge \beta )\).由于 \(\mu \)的范围是实数单位区间的有理数集 \([0,1]_{mathbb{Q}}\),所以我们的逻辑并不紧凑。为了获得强完整公理化,我们引入了一个具有可数前提集的无穷推理规则。主要的技术结果是强完备性和可判定性的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The Logic ILP for Intuitionistic Reasoning About Probability

We offer an alternative approach to the existing methods for intuitionistic formalization of reasoning about probability. In terms of Kripke models, each possible world is equipped with a structure of the form \(\langle H, \mu \rangle \) that needs not be a probability space. More precisely, though H needs not be a Boolean algebra, the corresponding monotone function (we call it measure) \(\mu : H \longrightarrow [0,1]_{\mathbb {Q}}\) satisfies the following condition: if \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), \(\alpha \wedge \beta \), \(\alpha \vee \beta \in H\), then \(\mu (\alpha \vee \beta ) = \mu (\alpha ) + \mu (\beta ) - \mu (\alpha \wedge \beta )\). Since the range of \(\mu \) is the set \([0,1]_{\mathbb {Q}}\) of rational numbers from the real unit interval, our logic is not compact. In order to obtain a strong complete axiomatization, we introduce an infinitary inference rule with a countable set of premises. The main technical results are the proofs of strong completeness and decidability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信