基于语言指数预测英语阅读理解测试的难度

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elaheh Rafatbakhsh, Alireza Ahmadi
{"title":"基于语言指数预测英语阅读理解测试的难度","authors":"Elaheh Rafatbakhsh, Alireza Ahmadi","doi":"10.1186/s40862-023-00214-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimating the difficulty of reading tests is critical in second language education and assessment. This study was aimed at examining various text features that might influence the difficulty level of a high-stakes reading comprehension test and predict test takers’ scores. To this end, the responses provided by 17,900 test takers on the reading comprehension subsection of a major high-stakes test, the Iranian National University Entrance Exam for the Master’s Program were examined. Overall, 63 reading passages in different versions of the test from 2017 to 2019 were studied with a focus on 16 indices that might help explain the reading difficulty and test takers’ scores. The results showed that the content word overlap index and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease formula had significant correlations with the observed difficulty and could therefore be considered better predictors of test difficulty compared to other variables. The findings suggest the use of various indices to estimate the reading difficulty before administering tests to ensure the equivalency and validity of tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":36383,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the difficulty of EFL reading comprehension tests based on linguistic indices\",\"authors\":\"Elaheh Rafatbakhsh, Alireza Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40862-023-00214-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Estimating the difficulty of reading tests is critical in second language education and assessment. This study was aimed at examining various text features that might influence the difficulty level of a high-stakes reading comprehension test and predict test takers’ scores. To this end, the responses provided by 17,900 test takers on the reading comprehension subsection of a major high-stakes test, the Iranian National University Entrance Exam for the Master’s Program were examined. Overall, 63 reading passages in different versions of the test from 2017 to 2019 were studied with a focus on 16 indices that might help explain the reading difficulty and test takers’ scores. The results showed that the content word overlap index and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease formula had significant correlations with the observed difficulty and could therefore be considered better predictors of test difficulty compared to other variables. The findings suggest the use of various indices to estimate the reading difficulty before administering tests to ensure the equivalency and validity of tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00214-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00214-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计阅读测试的难度对于第二语言教育和评估至关重要。本研究旨在探讨可能影响高风险阅读理解测试难度的各种文本特征,并预测应试者的分数。为此,研究人员对 17900 名考生在伊朗国立大学硕士课程入学考试这一大型高风险考试的阅读理解小节中的答题情况进行了研究。总共研究了 2017 年至 2019 年不同版本考试中的 63 个阅读段落,重点关注 16 个可能有助于解释阅读难度和考生分数的指标。结果显示,内容词重叠指数和Flesch-Kincaid阅读容易度公式与观察到的难度有显著相关性,因此与其他变量相比,可以被认为是预测考试难度的更好指标。研究结果表明,在进行测试之前,应使用各种指数来估计阅读难度,以确保测试的等效性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting the difficulty of EFL reading comprehension tests based on linguistic indices

Estimating the difficulty of reading tests is critical in second language education and assessment. This study was aimed at examining various text features that might influence the difficulty level of a high-stakes reading comprehension test and predict test takers’ scores. To this end, the responses provided by 17,900 test takers on the reading comprehension subsection of a major high-stakes test, the Iranian National University Entrance Exam for the Master’s Program were examined. Overall, 63 reading passages in different versions of the test from 2017 to 2019 were studied with a focus on 16 indices that might help explain the reading difficulty and test takers’ scores. The results showed that the content word overlap index and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease formula had significant correlations with the observed difficulty and could therefore be considered better predictors of test difficulty compared to other variables. The findings suggest the use of various indices to estimate the reading difficulty before administering tests to ensure the equivalency and validity of tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信