Laia Bernet-Vegué, Carolina Cantero-González, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, David Parada, Tiziana Perin, Zulma Quintero-Niño, Begoña Vieites Pérez-Quintela, Douglas Sánchez-Guzmán, Marina Castelvetere, David Hardisson Hernaez, María Dolores Martín-Salvago
{"title":"利用 OSNA 检测法验证乳腺癌初次系统治疗后总肿瘤负荷的预后和预测价值","authors":"Laia Bernet-Vegué, Carolina Cantero-González, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, David Parada, Tiziana Perin, Zulma Quintero-Niño, Begoña Vieites Pérez-Quintela, Douglas Sánchez-Guzmán, Marina Castelvetere, David Hardisson Hernaez, María Dolores Martín-Salvago","doi":"10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to validate the classification of breast cancer (BC) patients in progression risk groups based on total tumor load (TTL) value to predict lymph node (LN) affectation after neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) obtained in the NEOVATTL study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods/patients</h3><p>This was an observational, retrospective, international, multicenter study including patients with infiltrating BC who received NAST followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) analyzed with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) from nine Spanish and two Italian hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups according to the progression risk, measured as disease-free survival (DFS), based on TTL values (> 250, 250–25,000, and > 25,000 copies/μL). The previous (NEOVATTL study) Cox regression model for prognosis was validated using prognostic index (PI) and Log ratio test (LRT) analyses; the value of TTL for axillary non-SLN affectation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included 263 patients with a mean age of 51.4 (± SD 10.5) years. Patients with TTL > 25,000 copies/μL had a shorter DFS (HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693−7.489], <i>p</i> = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000). PI and LRT analyses showed no differences between the two cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.2553 and <i>p</i> = 0.226, respectively). ROC analysis showed concordance between TTL and non-SLN involvement (area under the curve 0.828), with 95.7% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity at a TTL cut-off of > 15,000 copies/μL.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In BC patients who had received NAST and underwent SLNB analysis using OSNA, a TTL value of > 25,000 copies/μL was associated with a higher progression risk and > 15,000 copies/μL was predictive of non-SLN involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10166,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","volume":"45 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of prognostic and predictive value of total tumoral load after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer using OSNA assay\",\"authors\":\"Laia Bernet-Vegué, Carolina Cantero-González, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, David Parada, Tiziana Perin, Zulma Quintero-Niño, Begoña Vieites Pérez-Quintela, Douglas Sánchez-Guzmán, Marina Castelvetere, David Hardisson Hernaez, María Dolores Martín-Salvago\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to validate the classification of breast cancer (BC) patients in progression risk groups based on total tumor load (TTL) value to predict lymph node (LN) affectation after neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) obtained in the NEOVATTL study.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods/patients</h3><p>This was an observational, retrospective, international, multicenter study including patients with infiltrating BC who received NAST followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) analyzed with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) from nine Spanish and two Italian hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups according to the progression risk, measured as disease-free survival (DFS), based on TTL values (> 250, 250–25,000, and > 25,000 copies/μL). The previous (NEOVATTL study) Cox regression model for prognosis was validated using prognostic index (PI) and Log ratio test (LRT) analyses; the value of TTL for axillary non-SLN affectation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>We included 263 patients with a mean age of 51.4 (± SD 10.5) years. Patients with TTL > 25,000 copies/μL had a shorter DFS (HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693−7.489], <i>p</i> = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000). PI and LRT analyses showed no differences between the two cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.2553 and <i>p</i> = 0.226, respectively). ROC analysis showed concordance between TTL and non-SLN involvement (area under the curve 0.828), with 95.7% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity at a TTL cut-off of > 15,000 copies/μL.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>In BC patients who had received NAST and underwent SLNB analysis using OSNA, a TTL value of > 25,000 copies/μL was associated with a higher progression risk and > 15,000 copies/μL was predictive of non-SLN involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"45 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在验证基于总肿瘤负荷(TTL)值的乳腺癌(BC)患者进展风险组别分类,以预测 NEOVATTL 研究中获得的新辅助全身治疗(NAST)后淋巴结(LN)受影响的情况。方法/患者这是一项观察性、回顾性、国际多中心研究,包括来自西班牙九家医院和意大利两家医院的浸润性BC患者,他们在接受NAST治疗后进行了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),并进行了一步核酸扩增(OSNA)分析。根据 TTL 值(250、250-25,000 和 25,000 拷贝/μL),以无疾病生存期(DFS)为衡量标准,将患者按疾病进展风险分为三组。使用预后指数(PI)和对数比值检验(LRT)分析验证了先前的(NEOVATTL 研究)Cox 回归预后模型;使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估了 TTL 对腋窝非淋巴结影响的价值。TTL>25,000拷贝/μL的患者DFS较短(HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693-7.489], p = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000)。PI 和 LRT 分析表明,两个组群之间没有差异(分别为 p = 0.2553 和 p = 0.226)。ROC分析显示,TTL与非SLN受累之间存在一致性(曲线下面积为0.828),在TTL临界值为> 15,000拷贝/μL时,灵敏度为95.7%,特异度为92.9%。结论在接受过NAST并使用OSNA进行SLNB分析的BC患者中,TTL值为> 25,000拷贝/μL与较高的进展风险相关,而> 15,000拷贝/μL可预测非SLN受累。
Validation of prognostic and predictive value of total tumoral load after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer using OSNA assay
Purpose
This study aimed to validate the classification of breast cancer (BC) patients in progression risk groups based on total tumor load (TTL) value to predict lymph node (LN) affectation after neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) obtained in the NEOVATTL study.
Methods/patients
This was an observational, retrospective, international, multicenter study including patients with infiltrating BC who received NAST followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) analyzed with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) from nine Spanish and two Italian hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups according to the progression risk, measured as disease-free survival (DFS), based on TTL values (> 250, 250–25,000, and > 25,000 copies/μL). The previous (NEOVATTL study) Cox regression model for prognosis was validated using prognostic index (PI) and Log ratio test (LRT) analyses; the value of TTL for axillary non-SLN affectation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
We included 263 patients with a mean age of 51.4 (± SD 10.5) years. Patients with TTL > 25,000 copies/μL had a shorter DFS (HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693−7.489], p = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000). PI and LRT analyses showed no differences between the two cohorts (p = 0.2553 and p = 0.226, respectively). ROC analysis showed concordance between TTL and non-SLN involvement (area under the curve 0.828), with 95.7% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity at a TTL cut-off of > 15,000 copies/μL.
Conclusions
In BC patients who had received NAST and underwent SLNB analysis using OSNA, a TTL value of > 25,000 copies/μL was associated with a higher progression risk and > 15,000 copies/μL was predictive of non-SLN involvement.