{"title":"如何与群众对话,第二部分:作为道德和语言典范的回良玉与 20 世纪越南音域形成的动力","authors":"Jack Sidnell","doi":"10.1111/jola.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hồ Chí Minh's extended essay <i>Fixing the Way We Work</i>, written in 1947 after he and other high-ranking members of the recently formed DRV (Democratic Republic of Vietnam; <i>Việt Nam Dân chủ Cộng hòa</i>), had been forced to retreat from Hanoi to the uplands of Thái Nguyên province, elaborates on organizational and practical problems within the party and obstacles to mass mobilization. The final chapter describes a way of speaking HCM refers to as <i>ba hoa</i> and which he sees as a “speech sickness” afflicting many low and middle ranking cadres who are in direct contact with the masses. In the first part of this essay, I argued that the largely proscriptive and negatively formulated instructions articulated in this context cohere by virtue of a common focus on problems of action. Specifically, <i>ba hoa</i> names a stereotyped speech register in which the connection between speaking and doing comes undone. In what follows, the second part of the essay, I describe the other, positively formulated half of the larger project of register formation: the elevation of HCM's own mode of expression (<i>phong cách diễn đạt</i>) to the status of an exemplary model that all Vietnamese people are expected to emulate. This involved extensive metasemiotic elaboration and (re)framing which was accomplished, in large part, through the writings of contemporaries and later interpreters. A consideration of this literature along with an analysis of the continued spectral presence of HCM in contemporary Vietnam allows for a specification of the semiotics of exemplarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","volume":"34 1","pages":"23-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jola.12413","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to speak to the masses, part II: Hồ Chí Minh as a moral and linguistic exemplar and the dynamics of register formation in 20th century Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Jack Sidnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jola.12413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hồ Chí Minh's extended essay <i>Fixing the Way We Work</i>, written in 1947 after he and other high-ranking members of the recently formed DRV (Democratic Republic of Vietnam; <i>Việt Nam Dân chủ Cộng hòa</i>), had been forced to retreat from Hanoi to the uplands of Thái Nguyên province, elaborates on organizational and practical problems within the party and obstacles to mass mobilization. The final chapter describes a way of speaking HCM refers to as <i>ba hoa</i> and which he sees as a “speech sickness” afflicting many low and middle ranking cadres who are in direct contact with the masses. In the first part of this essay, I argued that the largely proscriptive and negatively formulated instructions articulated in this context cohere by virtue of a common focus on problems of action. Specifically, <i>ba hoa</i> names a stereotyped speech register in which the connection between speaking and doing comes undone. In what follows, the second part of the essay, I describe the other, positively formulated half of the larger project of register formation: the elevation of HCM's own mode of expression (<i>phong cách diễn đạt</i>) to the status of an exemplary model that all Vietnamese people are expected to emulate. This involved extensive metasemiotic elaboration and (re)framing which was accomplished, in large part, through the writings of contemporaries and later interpreters. A consideration of this literature along with an analysis of the continued spectral presence of HCM in contemporary Vietnam allows for a specification of the semiotics of exemplarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"23-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jola.12413\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1947年,刚成立不久的越南民主共和国(DRV)被迫从河内撤退到太原省(Thái Nguyên)的高原地区,之后,回良玉和其他高级成员撰写了长篇文章《修正我们的工作方式》,详细阐述了党内的组织和实际问题以及动员群众的障碍。最后一章描述了 HCM 称为 ba hoa 的一种说话方式,他认为这是一种 "说话病",困扰着许多直接接触群众的中低层干部。在本文的第一部分中,我曾论证过,在这种情况下阐述的主要是规范性和否定性的指示,它们因共同关注行动问题而结合在一起。具体来说,"ba hoa "指的是一种刻板的语域,在这种语域中,说与做之间的联系被打破了。在接下来的文章第二部分,我将描述语域形成大工程的另一半,即正面表述的另一半:将胡敏自己的表达方式(phong cách diễn đạt)提升到所有越南人都应效仿的典范地位。这涉及大量的元符号学阐释和(重新)构架,在很大程度上是通过同时代人和后来的解释者的著作完成的。通过对这些文献的研究,以及对 HCM 在当代越南的持续存在的分析,可以对典范的符号学进行具体说明。
How to speak to the masses, part II: Hồ Chí Minh as a moral and linguistic exemplar and the dynamics of register formation in 20th century Vietnam
Hồ Chí Minh's extended essay Fixing the Way We Work, written in 1947 after he and other high-ranking members of the recently formed DRV (Democratic Republic of Vietnam; Việt Nam Dân chủ Cộng hòa), had been forced to retreat from Hanoi to the uplands of Thái Nguyên province, elaborates on organizational and practical problems within the party and obstacles to mass mobilization. The final chapter describes a way of speaking HCM refers to as ba hoa and which he sees as a “speech sickness” afflicting many low and middle ranking cadres who are in direct contact with the masses. In the first part of this essay, I argued that the largely proscriptive and negatively formulated instructions articulated in this context cohere by virtue of a common focus on problems of action. Specifically, ba hoa names a stereotyped speech register in which the connection between speaking and doing comes undone. In what follows, the second part of the essay, I describe the other, positively formulated half of the larger project of register formation: the elevation of HCM's own mode of expression (phong cách diễn đạt) to the status of an exemplary model that all Vietnamese people are expected to emulate. This involved extensive metasemiotic elaboration and (re)framing which was accomplished, in large part, through the writings of contemporaries and later interpreters. A consideration of this literature along with an analysis of the continued spectral presence of HCM in contemporary Vietnam allows for a specification of the semiotics of exemplarity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Linguistic Anthropology explores the many ways in which language shapes social life. Published with the journal"s pages are articles on the anthropological study of language, including analysis of discourse, language in society, language and cognition, and language acquisition of socialization. The Journal of Linguistic Anthropology is published semiannually.