非透析肾病和肾移植患者的远程医疗观点--定性 Meta 分析

Christopher D. Manko, Benjamin J. Apple, Alexander R. Chang, Bobbie L. Johannes
{"title":"非透析肾病和肾移植患者的远程医疗观点--定性 Meta 分析","authors":"Christopher D. Manko, Benjamin J. Apple, Alexander R. Chang, Bobbie L. Johannes","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.07.23299612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale & Objective: While the use of telemedicine has increased dramatically across disciplines, patient perspectives on telemedicine related to chronic kidney disease are not well understood. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on patients with chronic kidney disease to better understand these patients' perspectives related to telemedicine. Study Design: Qualitative Meta–Analysis Setting & Study Populations: Pre–dialysis chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients that used telemedicine. Selection Criteria for Studies: English language studies published in the year 2000 and beyond that investigated patient perspectives in a qualitative manner. Works that were not qualitative or did not focus on provider-patient interactive modes of telemedicine were excluded. Data Extraction: 375 papers were pulled from PubMed, Embase, and Academic Science Premier. After filtering, 8 final papers were selected. These papers were critically appraised for quality and were used in the final analysis. Analytical Approach: We developed a codebook to systematically review each of the selected papers through qualitative meta-analysis. Results: Four primary themes were identified (autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust) with additional subthemes and further subdivisions to signify positive versus negative experiences. The majority of subthemes and subdivisions (n=9) identified were positively attributed by patients compared to negative attributes (n=6). The subtheme most commonly found was avoiding travel to the hospital, which was identified in all 8 papers. There was substantial variability in the number of papers demonstrating the other subthemes and subdivisions. Limitations: Lack of provider perspectives, non-English studies, and studies published before the year 2000. Papers published after the start of data extraction were also not included. Conclusions: Telemedicine should continue to be offered to patients with kidney disease and kidney transplant patients to facilitate access. Additional research should focus on ways to decrease negative factors experienced by some patients such as difficulty with using the technology.","PeriodicalId":501513,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine Perspectives of Patients with Non-Dialysis Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant - A Qualitative Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christopher D. Manko, Benjamin J. Apple, Alexander R. Chang, Bobbie L. Johannes\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.12.07.23299612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale & Objective: While the use of telemedicine has increased dramatically across disciplines, patient perspectives on telemedicine related to chronic kidney disease are not well understood. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on patients with chronic kidney disease to better understand these patients' perspectives related to telemedicine. Study Design: Qualitative Meta–Analysis Setting & Study Populations: Pre–dialysis chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients that used telemedicine. Selection Criteria for Studies: English language studies published in the year 2000 and beyond that investigated patient perspectives in a qualitative manner. Works that were not qualitative or did not focus on provider-patient interactive modes of telemedicine were excluded. Data Extraction: 375 papers were pulled from PubMed, Embase, and Academic Science Premier. After filtering, 8 final papers were selected. These papers were critically appraised for quality and were used in the final analysis. Analytical Approach: We developed a codebook to systematically review each of the selected papers through qualitative meta-analysis. Results: Four primary themes were identified (autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust) with additional subthemes and further subdivisions to signify positive versus negative experiences. The majority of subthemes and subdivisions (n=9) identified were positively attributed by patients compared to negative attributes (n=6). The subtheme most commonly found was avoiding travel to the hospital, which was identified in all 8 papers. There was substantial variability in the number of papers demonstrating the other subthemes and subdivisions. Limitations: Lack of provider perspectives, non-English studies, and studies published before the year 2000. Papers published after the start of data extraction were also not included. Conclusions: Telemedicine should continue to be offered to patients with kidney disease and kidney transplant patients to facilitate access. Additional research should focus on ways to decrease negative factors experienced by some patients such as difficulty with using the technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.07.23299612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.07.23299612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由与目标:虽然远程医疗的使用在各学科中急剧增加,但患者对与慢性肾病有关的远程医疗的看法却不甚了解。我们系统回顾了有关慢性肾病患者的定性研究,以更好地了解这些患者对远程医疗的看法。研究设计:定性 Meta 分析;研究人群:使用远程医疗的透析前慢性肾病和肾移植患者。研究的选择标准:2000 年及以后发表的以定性方式调查患者观点的英文研究。不包括非定性研究或不关注远程医疗中医患互动模式的研究。数据提取:从 PubMed、Embase 和 Academic Science Premier 中提取了 375 篇论文。经过筛选,最终选出 8 篇论文。对这些论文进行了严格的质量评估,并将其用于最终分析。分析方法:我们制定了一个编码手册,通过定性荟萃分析对每篇入选论文进行系统审查。结果我们确定了四个主要主题(自主性、后勤、隐私/保密性和信任)以及其他次主题和进一步的细分,以表示积极与消极的经历。与负面属性(6 个)相比,大多数副主题和细分主题(9 个)都得到了患者的积极评价。最常见的次主题是避免前往医院,所有 8 篇论文都提到了这一点。展示其他次主题和分主题的论文数量差异很大。局限性:缺乏医疗服务提供者的观点、非英语研究以及 2000 年之前发表的研究。数据提取开始后发表的论文也未包括在内。结论:应继续向肾病患者和肾移植患者提供远程医疗,以方便他们就医。其他研究应关注如何减少一些患者遇到的负面因素,如使用技术的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telemedicine Perspectives of Patients with Non-Dialysis Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant - A Qualitative Meta-Analysis
Rationale & Objective: While the use of telemedicine has increased dramatically across disciplines, patient perspectives on telemedicine related to chronic kidney disease are not well understood. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on patients with chronic kidney disease to better understand these patients' perspectives related to telemedicine. Study Design: Qualitative Meta–Analysis Setting & Study Populations: Pre–dialysis chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients that used telemedicine. Selection Criteria for Studies: English language studies published in the year 2000 and beyond that investigated patient perspectives in a qualitative manner. Works that were not qualitative or did not focus on provider-patient interactive modes of telemedicine were excluded. Data Extraction: 375 papers were pulled from PubMed, Embase, and Academic Science Premier. After filtering, 8 final papers were selected. These papers were critically appraised for quality and were used in the final analysis. Analytical Approach: We developed a codebook to systematically review each of the selected papers through qualitative meta-analysis. Results: Four primary themes were identified (autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust) with additional subthemes and further subdivisions to signify positive versus negative experiences. The majority of subthemes and subdivisions (n=9) identified were positively attributed by patients compared to negative attributes (n=6). The subtheme most commonly found was avoiding travel to the hospital, which was identified in all 8 papers. There was substantial variability in the number of papers demonstrating the other subthemes and subdivisions. Limitations: Lack of provider perspectives, non-English studies, and studies published before the year 2000. Papers published after the start of data extraction were also not included. Conclusions: Telemedicine should continue to be offered to patients with kidney disease and kidney transplant patients to facilitate access. Additional research should focus on ways to decrease negative factors experienced by some patients such as difficulty with using the technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信