胃癌的微卫星不稳定性:对接受新辅助治疗的患者进行机构病例系列分析

Laura Lorenzon, Alberto Biondi, Gloria Santoro, Annamaria Agnes, Antonio Laurino, Antonia Strippoli, Riccardo Ricci, Roberto Persiani, Domenico D'Ugo
{"title":"胃癌的微卫星不稳定性:对接受新辅助治疗的患者进行机构病例系列分析","authors":"Laura Lorenzon,&nbsp;Alberto Biondi,&nbsp;Gloria Santoro,&nbsp;Annamaria Agnes,&nbsp;Antonio Laurino,&nbsp;Antonia Strippoli,&nbsp;Riccardo Ricci,&nbsp;Roberto Persiani,&nbsp;Domenico D'Ugo","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Past studies documented that microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with improved survival in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to evaluate MSI status in a series of GCs treated with neoadjuvant therapy in relation to the tumors' characteristics and oncological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with GCs treated between 2017 and 2022 ​at a single Italian high-volume Institution undergoing pre-operative treatment followed by resection were included if studied for their microsatellite status. Clinicopathological data were analyzed for the association with MSI. The same features were analyzing pooling the series with a subset of patients from another European trial.</p><p>Secondary outcomes included the overall (OS), and disease-free (DFS) survivals comparing MSI <em>vs</em> microsatellite stable (MSS) GCs, and GCs presenting complete-major response (TRG1-2) <em>vs</em> partial response (TRG3-4) and absence of response (TRG5).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 73 patients selected, 12.3% were MSI. In the single institutional analysis, we documented a difference in the distribution of ypT stages with a prevalence of ypT0 patients in MSI <em>vs</em> MSS patients (ypT0 respectively 11.1% vs 1.6%, p ​&lt; ​0.0001). However, this difference was not of statistical value when pooling patients with those from the European trial (overall 108 patients, 9.2% MSI; ypT0 respectively 10.0% <em>vs</em> 2.0%, p 0.144). In the pooled analysis, a prevalence of female patients was reported in the MSI group comparing MSS (respectively, 70.0% <em>vs</em> 27.6%, p 0.01). At a mean follow-up of 27.7 months, OS and DFS survivals were reported similar comparing MSS and MSI (log-rank test respectively p 0.18 and p 0.96), however TRG1-2 ​GCs had improved OS and DFS comparing other sub-groups (TRG1-2 <em>vs</em> TRG3-4 <em>vs</em> TRG5, OS and DFS log-rank test respectively p 0.017 and p 0.0029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study could not demonstrate a correlation between microsatellite status and survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent pre-operative treatment. A complete/major response was the only variable correlated with mid-term survival.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000235/pdfft?md5=50f1d3d1c0e2bdacc97c4552e00380f1&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X23000235-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: An institutional case series analysis in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy\",\"authors\":\"Laura Lorenzon,&nbsp;Alberto Biondi,&nbsp;Gloria Santoro,&nbsp;Annamaria Agnes,&nbsp;Antonio Laurino,&nbsp;Antonia Strippoli,&nbsp;Riccardo Ricci,&nbsp;Roberto Persiani,&nbsp;Domenico D'Ugo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Past studies documented that microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with improved survival in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to evaluate MSI status in a series of GCs treated with neoadjuvant therapy in relation to the tumors' characteristics and oncological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with GCs treated between 2017 and 2022 ​at a single Italian high-volume Institution undergoing pre-operative treatment followed by resection were included if studied for their microsatellite status. Clinicopathological data were analyzed for the association with MSI. The same features were analyzing pooling the series with a subset of patients from another European trial.</p><p>Secondary outcomes included the overall (OS), and disease-free (DFS) survivals comparing MSI <em>vs</em> microsatellite stable (MSS) GCs, and GCs presenting complete-major response (TRG1-2) <em>vs</em> partial response (TRG3-4) and absence of response (TRG5).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 73 patients selected, 12.3% were MSI. In the single institutional analysis, we documented a difference in the distribution of ypT stages with a prevalence of ypT0 patients in MSI <em>vs</em> MSS patients (ypT0 respectively 11.1% vs 1.6%, p ​&lt; ​0.0001). However, this difference was not of statistical value when pooling patients with those from the European trial (overall 108 patients, 9.2% MSI; ypT0 respectively 10.0% <em>vs</em> 2.0%, p 0.144). In the pooled analysis, a prevalence of female patients was reported in the MSI group comparing MSS (respectively, 70.0% <em>vs</em> 27.6%, p 0.01). At a mean follow-up of 27.7 months, OS and DFS survivals were reported similar comparing MSS and MSI (log-rank test respectively p 0.18 and p 0.96), however TRG1-2 ​GCs had improved OS and DFS comparing other sub-groups (TRG1-2 <em>vs</em> TRG3-4 <em>vs</em> TRG5, OS and DFS log-rank test respectively p 0.017 and p 0.0029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study could not demonstrate a correlation between microsatellite status and survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent pre-operative treatment. A complete/major response was the only variable correlated with mid-term survival.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000235/pdfft?md5=50f1d3d1c0e2bdacc97c4552e00380f1&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X23000235-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:过去的研究表明,微卫星不稳定性(MSI)与胃癌(GC)生存率的提高有关。本研究旨在评估一系列接受新辅助治疗的胃癌患者的微卫星状态与肿瘤特征和肿瘤学预后的关系。方法纳入2017年至2022年期间在意大利一家大医院接受术前治疗并随后进行切除术的胃癌患者,并对其微卫星状态进行研究。分析了临床病理数据与 MSI 的关系。次要结果包括MSI与微卫星稳定(MSS)GCs的总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)比较,以及出现完全-主要反应(TRG1-2)与部分反应(TRG3-4)和无反应(TRG5)的GCs的总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)比较。在单个机构的分析中,我们发现 ypT 分期的分布存在差异,MSI 与 MSS 患者中 ypT0 分期患者的比例存在差异(ypT0 分别为 11.1% 与 1.6%,p < 0.0001)。然而,如果将患者与欧洲试验中的患者进行汇总,这一差异并不具有统计学价值(总计 108 名患者,9.2% 为 MSI;ypT0 分别为 10.0% vs 2.0%,p 0.144)。在汇总分析中,MSI 组与 MSS 组相比,女性患者的比例更高(分别为 70.0% vs 27.6%,P 0.01)。在平均 27.7 个月的随访中,MSS 和 MSI 的 OS 和 DFS 存活率相似(对数秩检验分别为 p 0.18 和 p 0.96),但 TRG1-2 GC 与其他亚组相比,OS 和 DFS 有所改善(TRG1-2 vs TRG3-4 vs TRG5,OS 和 DFS 对数秩检验分别为 p 0.结论本研究无法证明接受术前治疗的胃癌患者的微卫星状态与生存期之间存在相关性。完全/主要反应是唯一与中期生存率相关的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: An institutional case series analysis in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy

Introduction

Past studies documented that microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with improved survival in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to evaluate MSI status in a series of GCs treated with neoadjuvant therapy in relation to the tumors' characteristics and oncological outcomes.

Methods

Patients with GCs treated between 2017 and 2022 ​at a single Italian high-volume Institution undergoing pre-operative treatment followed by resection were included if studied for their microsatellite status. Clinicopathological data were analyzed for the association with MSI. The same features were analyzing pooling the series with a subset of patients from another European trial.

Secondary outcomes included the overall (OS), and disease-free (DFS) survivals comparing MSI vs microsatellite stable (MSS) GCs, and GCs presenting complete-major response (TRG1-2) vs partial response (TRG3-4) and absence of response (TRG5).

Results

Among 73 patients selected, 12.3% were MSI. In the single institutional analysis, we documented a difference in the distribution of ypT stages with a prevalence of ypT0 patients in MSI vs MSS patients (ypT0 respectively 11.1% vs 1.6%, p ​< ​0.0001). However, this difference was not of statistical value when pooling patients with those from the European trial (overall 108 patients, 9.2% MSI; ypT0 respectively 10.0% vs 2.0%, p 0.144). In the pooled analysis, a prevalence of female patients was reported in the MSI group comparing MSS (respectively, 70.0% vs 27.6%, p 0.01). At a mean follow-up of 27.7 months, OS and DFS survivals were reported similar comparing MSS and MSI (log-rank test respectively p 0.18 and p 0.96), however TRG1-2 ​GCs had improved OS and DFS comparing other sub-groups (TRG1-2 vs TRG3-4 vs TRG5, OS and DFS log-rank test respectively p 0.017 and p 0.0029).

Conclusion

This study could not demonstrate a correlation between microsatellite status and survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent pre-operative treatment. A complete/major response was the only variable correlated with mid-term survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信