慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉患者的生物制剂使用和治疗模式:一项美国真实世界研究

Jared Silver, Elizabeth Packnett, Julie Park, Arijita Deb
{"title":"慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉患者的生物制剂使用和治疗模式:一项美国真实世界研究","authors":"Jared Silver, Elizabeth Packnett, Julie Park, Arijita Deb","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00855-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several biologics are now approved in the US as add-on treatments for chronic rhinosinusitus with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This cross-sectional, retrospective, real-world study aimed to characterize treatment patterns and identify predictors of biologic use among patients with CRSwNP. Adults in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases with medical claims for CRSwNP were identified June 2018–June 2019 (identification period [IP]). Patient characteristics were collated in the IP and treatment pattern data during the IP plus the following year (July 2019–June 2020; observation period [OP]). Data were stratified by sinus surgery and biologic use. Of the 5997 eligible patients identified (58% male, mean age 48.1 years), 10.7% (n = 642) used biologics during the OP. More biologic users had common respiratory conditions than non-users, particularly asthma (89.1% vs 35.0%; P < 0.001). Biologic users had fewer diagnostic services but more drug-related services than non-users. Only 11.6% of patients who had sinus surgery used biologics, with most (56.1%) having their first biologic dose before sinus surgery and 12.5% ≤ 30 days after. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was higher in biologic users than non-users (all patients: 68.8% vs 42.5%; P < 0.001) and in those with/without sinus surgery. Comorbidities, prior OCS/doxycycline use, and age (< 65 years) increased the odds of biologic use, with asthma increasing the odds 5.46 times (P < 0.001). Biologic use was more common before first/next sinus surgery and in patients with high unmet need, elucidating predictors of biologic use that could be used in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":501611,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologic use and treatment patterns in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a US real-world study\",\"authors\":\"Jared Silver, Elizabeth Packnett, Julie Park, Arijita Deb\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13223-023-00855-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several biologics are now approved in the US as add-on treatments for chronic rhinosinusitus with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This cross-sectional, retrospective, real-world study aimed to characterize treatment patterns and identify predictors of biologic use among patients with CRSwNP. Adults in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases with medical claims for CRSwNP were identified June 2018–June 2019 (identification period [IP]). Patient characteristics were collated in the IP and treatment pattern data during the IP plus the following year (July 2019–June 2020; observation period [OP]). Data were stratified by sinus surgery and biologic use. Of the 5997 eligible patients identified (58% male, mean age 48.1 years), 10.7% (n = 642) used biologics during the OP. More biologic users had common respiratory conditions than non-users, particularly asthma (89.1% vs 35.0%; P < 0.001). Biologic users had fewer diagnostic services but more drug-related services than non-users. Only 11.6% of patients who had sinus surgery used biologics, with most (56.1%) having their first biologic dose before sinus surgery and 12.5% ≤ 30 days after. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was higher in biologic users than non-users (all patients: 68.8% vs 42.5%; P < 0.001) and in those with/without sinus surgery. Comorbidities, prior OCS/doxycycline use, and age (< 65 years) increased the odds of biologic use, with asthma increasing the odds 5.46 times (P < 0.001). Biologic use was more common before first/next sinus surgery and in patients with high unmet need, elucidating predictors of biologic use that could be used in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00855-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00855-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,美国已批准多种生物制剂作为慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的辅助治疗药物。这项横断面、回顾性、真实世界研究旨在描述 CRSwNP 患者的治疗模式,并确定使用生物制剂的预测因素。2018年6月至2019年6月(识别期 [IP]),在Merative MarketScan商业数据库和医疗保险补充数据库中识别了有CRSwNP医疗索赔的成年人。在 IP 期间整理患者特征,并在 IP 期间和下一年(2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月;观察期 [OP])整理治疗模式数据。数据按鼻窦手术和生物制剂使用情况进行分层。在 5997 名符合条件的患者中(58% 为男性,平均年龄 48.1 岁),10.7%(n = 642)的患者在观察期内使用了生物制剂。与不使用生物制剂的患者相比,更多的生物制剂使用者患有常见的呼吸系统疾病,尤其是哮喘(89.1% 对 35.0%;P < 0.001)。与未使用生物制剂的患者相比,使用生物制剂的患者接受的诊断服务较少,但接受的药物相关服务较多。只有 11.6% 的鼻窦手术患者使用了生物制剂,其中大部分(56.1%)患者在鼻窦手术前使用了第一剂生物制剂,12.5% 的患者在手术后 30 天内使用了第一剂生物制剂。口服皮质类固醇(OCS)的使用率在使用生物制剂的患者中高于未使用生物制剂的患者(所有患者:68.8% vs 42.5%;P < 0.001),在接受/未接受鼻窦手术的患者中也是如此。合并症、曾使用过 OCS/多西环素和年龄(小于 65 岁)会增加使用生物制剂的几率,而哮喘会使几率增加 5.46 倍(P < 0.001)。在首次/下一次鼻窦手术前以及需求未得到满足的患者中,使用生物制剂的情况更为普遍,这阐明了可用于临床实践的生物制剂使用预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biologic use and treatment patterns in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a US real-world study
Several biologics are now approved in the US as add-on treatments for chronic rhinosinusitus with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This cross-sectional, retrospective, real-world study aimed to characterize treatment patterns and identify predictors of biologic use among patients with CRSwNP. Adults in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases with medical claims for CRSwNP were identified June 2018–June 2019 (identification period [IP]). Patient characteristics were collated in the IP and treatment pattern data during the IP plus the following year (July 2019–June 2020; observation period [OP]). Data were stratified by sinus surgery and biologic use. Of the 5997 eligible patients identified (58% male, mean age 48.1 years), 10.7% (n = 642) used biologics during the OP. More biologic users had common respiratory conditions than non-users, particularly asthma (89.1% vs 35.0%; P < 0.001). Biologic users had fewer diagnostic services but more drug-related services than non-users. Only 11.6% of patients who had sinus surgery used biologics, with most (56.1%) having their first biologic dose before sinus surgery and 12.5% ≤ 30 days after. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was higher in biologic users than non-users (all patients: 68.8% vs 42.5%; P < 0.001) and in those with/without sinus surgery. Comorbidities, prior OCS/doxycycline use, and age (< 65 years) increased the odds of biologic use, with asthma increasing the odds 5.46 times (P < 0.001). Biologic use was more common before first/next sinus surgery and in patients with high unmet need, elucidating predictors of biologic use that could be used in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信