a-SAH 早期脑损伤评估在预测认知障碍的脑结构异常中的作用

Mingdong Wang, Qian-Hui Fu, Andrew Ni, Yun-Peng Yuan, Chun-Hui Li, Zhan Xiang WANG, Hong Wang
{"title":"a-SAH 早期脑损伤评估在预测认知障碍的脑结构异常中的作用","authors":"Mingdong Wang, Qian-Hui Fu, Andrew Ni, Yun-Peng Yuan, Chun-Hui Li, Zhan Xiang WANG, Hong Wang","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early brain edema and/or Hematoma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) is an important impact determinant of clinical cognition outcomes. However, due to the lack of early assessment of the impact on cognitive structural systems, Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and/or decision-making models, termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS). Methods 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH and initial CT/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (24 h of ictus) and follow-up 2 months. Clinically relevant factors and a variety of traditional different scale ratings were defined using Linear regression analysis (Univariate, multivariate). The risk factors with highest values for area under the curve (AUC) were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis.\nResults A total of 177 patients were enrolled in this study, 43 patients had a high SEBE-HCNNSS classification (grade 3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2month, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects had incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. ROC analysis showed that the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) was determined to be an independent predictor of edema, CI and unfavorable prognosis. These results were replicated in validation cohort.\nConclusions SEBE-HCNNSS scale is fairly easy to perform and this study indicates that is good predictor value for CI and clinical outcomes after SAH. we suggest that it is practically useful prognostic instrument for the risk evaluation after a-SAH.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Early Brain Injury assessment in a-SAH in predicting Structural Brain Abnormalities in Cognitive Impairments\",\"authors\":\"Mingdong Wang, Qian-Hui Fu, Andrew Ni, Yun-Peng Yuan, Chun-Hui Li, Zhan Xiang WANG, Hong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Early brain edema and/or Hematoma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) is an important impact determinant of clinical cognition outcomes. However, due to the lack of early assessment of the impact on cognitive structural systems, Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and/or decision-making models, termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS). Methods 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH and initial CT/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (24 h of ictus) and follow-up 2 months. Clinically relevant factors and a variety of traditional different scale ratings were defined using Linear regression analysis (Univariate, multivariate). The risk factors with highest values for area under the curve (AUC) were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis.\\nResults A total of 177 patients were enrolled in this study, 43 patients had a high SEBE-HCNNSS classification (grade 3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2month, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects had incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. ROC analysis showed that the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) was determined to be an independent predictor of edema, CI and unfavorable prognosis. These results were replicated in validation cohort.\\nConclusions SEBE-HCNNSS scale is fairly easy to perform and this study indicates that is good predictor value for CI and clinical outcomes after SAH. we suggest that it is practically useful prognostic instrument for the risk evaluation after a-SAH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(a-SAH)后的早期脑水肿和/或血肿是决定临床认知结果的重要影响因素。然而,由于缺乏对认知结构系统影响的早期评估,因此需要开发早期预测和/或决策模型,即 a-SAH 早期脑水肿/血肿压迫神经(脑结构)网络评分系统(SEBE-HCNNSS)。方法 202 例自发性 a-SAH 连续患者和初始 CT/磁共振成像 (MRI) 扫描(发病 24 小时),随访 2 个月。通过线性回归分析(单变量和多变量)确定了临床相关因素和各种传统的不同量表评级。曲线下面积(AUC)值最高的风险因素被纳入多变量分析和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)分析或 Cox 回归分析。平均随访2个月后,121名a-SAH患者(68.36%)和3名对照组患者发生了CI。ROC分析表明,SEBE-HCNNSS量表(OR 3.322,95% CI 2.312-7.237,p = 0.00025)是水肿、CI和不良预后的独立预测因子。结论 SEBE-HCNNSS 量表非常容易操作,本研究表明它对 SAH 后的 CI 和临床预后有很好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Early Brain Injury assessment in a-SAH in predicting Structural Brain Abnormalities in Cognitive Impairments
Background Early brain edema and/or Hematoma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) is an important impact determinant of clinical cognition outcomes. However, due to the lack of early assessment of the impact on cognitive structural systems, Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and/or decision-making models, termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS). Methods 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH and initial CT/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (24 h of ictus) and follow-up 2 months. Clinically relevant factors and a variety of traditional different scale ratings were defined using Linear regression analysis (Univariate, multivariate). The risk factors with highest values for area under the curve (AUC) were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 177 patients were enrolled in this study, 43 patients had a high SEBE-HCNNSS classification (grade 3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2month, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects had incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. ROC analysis showed that the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) was determined to be an independent predictor of edema, CI and unfavorable prognosis. These results were replicated in validation cohort. Conclusions SEBE-HCNNSS scale is fairly easy to perform and this study indicates that is good predictor value for CI and clinical outcomes after SAH. we suggest that it is practically useful prognostic instrument for the risk evaluation after a-SAH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信