城市化社区中可感知的城市生态系统服务和不服务:社区成员与国家信息提供者的不同观点

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mary Kathryn Rodgman , Isabelle Anguelovski , Carmen Pérez-del-Pulgar , Galia Shokry , Melissa Garcia-Lamarca , James J.T. Connolly , Francesc Baró , Margarita Triguero-Mas
{"title":"城市化社区中可感知的城市生态系统服务和不服务:社区成员与国家信息提供者的不同观点","authors":"Mary Kathryn Rodgman ,&nbsp;Isabelle Anguelovski ,&nbsp;Carmen Pérez-del-Pulgar ,&nbsp;Galia Shokry ,&nbsp;Melissa Garcia-Lamarca ,&nbsp;James J.T. Connolly ,&nbsp;Francesc Baró ,&nbsp;Margarita Triguero-Mas","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As assessing urban ecosystem services and disservices is of rapidly growing interest in a context of increasingly urbanized environments, greater scholarly attention needs to be placed on how different informants perceive these services and disservices. Previous research in urban geography and planning has already pointed at the challenges of building inclusive natural outdoor environments such as green and blue spaces in gentrifying neighborhoods, particularly those undergoing green gentrification. In response, we analyze the ecosystem services and disservices identified by community and state respondents in seven cities with gentrifying neighborhoods, pronounced social inequalities, and where natural outdoor environments were created or improved: Amsterdam, Bristol, Cleveland, Lyon, Montreal, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. We found that in cities experiencing green gentrification, interviewees – particularly community informants – reported a wide array of ecosystem services and disservices, and identified some disservices previously under-studied (i.e. physical tiredness, low attractiveness and forced displacement). Our study illustrates how differences in decision making positions can impact perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices. Our study has implications for urban environmental planning decisions that will help maximize the ecosystem services provided by urban natural outdoor environments. Only if all perceived ecosystem services and disservices are considered, will it be possible to design green just cities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000645/pdfft?md5=bb88977488f1c3f3c705f53f38a446f8&pid=1-s2.0-S2212041623000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived urban ecosystem services and disservices in gentrifying neighborhoods: Contrasting views between community members and state informants\",\"authors\":\"Mary Kathryn Rodgman ,&nbsp;Isabelle Anguelovski ,&nbsp;Carmen Pérez-del-Pulgar ,&nbsp;Galia Shokry ,&nbsp;Melissa Garcia-Lamarca ,&nbsp;James J.T. Connolly ,&nbsp;Francesc Baró ,&nbsp;Margarita Triguero-Mas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As assessing urban ecosystem services and disservices is of rapidly growing interest in a context of increasingly urbanized environments, greater scholarly attention needs to be placed on how different informants perceive these services and disservices. Previous research in urban geography and planning has already pointed at the challenges of building inclusive natural outdoor environments such as green and blue spaces in gentrifying neighborhoods, particularly those undergoing green gentrification. In response, we analyze the ecosystem services and disservices identified by community and state respondents in seven cities with gentrifying neighborhoods, pronounced social inequalities, and where natural outdoor environments were created or improved: Amsterdam, Bristol, Cleveland, Lyon, Montreal, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. We found that in cities experiencing green gentrification, interviewees – particularly community informants – reported a wide array of ecosystem services and disservices, and identified some disservices previously under-studied (i.e. physical tiredness, low attractiveness and forced displacement). Our study illustrates how differences in decision making positions can impact perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices. Our study has implications for urban environmental planning decisions that will help maximize the ecosystem services provided by urban natural outdoor environments. Only if all perceived ecosystem services and disservices are considered, will it be possible to design green just cities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000645/pdfft?md5=bb88977488f1c3f3c705f53f38a446f8&pid=1-s2.0-S2212041623000645-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000645\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日益城市化的环境中,对城市生态系统服务和非服务进行评估的兴趣与日俱增,因此学术界需要更多地关注不同信息提供者如何看待这些服务和非服务。城市地理和规划方面的先前研究已经指出了在城市化社区,尤其是正在经历绿色城市化的社区中建设包容性自然室外环境(如绿色和蓝色空间)所面临的挑战。作为回应,我们分析了七个城市的社区和国家受访者所确定的生态系统服务和非服务,这些城市的居民区正在绅士化,社会不平等现象明显,自然户外环境得到了创建或改善:阿姆斯特丹、布里斯托尔、克利夫兰、里昂、蒙特利尔、费城和旧金山。我们发现,在经历绿色绅士化的城市中,受访者(尤其是社区信息提供者)报告了一系列广泛的生态系统服务和非服务,并确定了一些以前未充分研究的非服务(即身体疲劳、吸引力低和被迫迁移)。我们的研究说明了决策立场的差异如何影响对生态系统服务和非服务的认知。我们的研究对城市环境规划决策具有启示意义,有助于最大限度地利用城市室外自然环境提供的生态系统服务。只有考虑到所有感知到的生态系统服务和非服务,才有可能设计出绿色城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived urban ecosystem services and disservices in gentrifying neighborhoods: Contrasting views between community members and state informants

As assessing urban ecosystem services and disservices is of rapidly growing interest in a context of increasingly urbanized environments, greater scholarly attention needs to be placed on how different informants perceive these services and disservices. Previous research in urban geography and planning has already pointed at the challenges of building inclusive natural outdoor environments such as green and blue spaces in gentrifying neighborhoods, particularly those undergoing green gentrification. In response, we analyze the ecosystem services and disservices identified by community and state respondents in seven cities with gentrifying neighborhoods, pronounced social inequalities, and where natural outdoor environments were created or improved: Amsterdam, Bristol, Cleveland, Lyon, Montreal, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. We found that in cities experiencing green gentrification, interviewees – particularly community informants – reported a wide array of ecosystem services and disservices, and identified some disservices previously under-studied (i.e. physical tiredness, low attractiveness and forced displacement). Our study illustrates how differences in decision making positions can impact perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices. Our study has implications for urban environmental planning decisions that will help maximize the ecosystem services provided by urban natural outdoor environments. Only if all perceived ecosystem services and disservices are considered, will it be possible to design green just cities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信