现场流行病学家如何学习?现场流行病学培训项目学习定性调查协议

Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn D. Kirk
{"title":"现场流行病学家如何学习?现场流行病学培训项目学习定性调查协议","authors":"Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn D. Kirk","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. COVID-19 underscored the importance of field epidemiology training programs (FETP) as countries struggled with overwhelming demands. Experts are calling for more field epidemiologists with better training. Since 1951 FETP have been building public health capacities across the globe, yet explorations of learning in these programs are lacking. This qualitative study will 1) describe approaches to training field epidemiologists in FETP; 2) describe strategies for learning field epidemiology among FETP trainees; and 3) explain the principles and practices aligning training approaches with learning strategies in FETP. Methods and analysis. The research design, implementation, and interpretation are collaborative efforts with FETP trainers. Data collection will include interviews with FETP trainers and trainees and participant observations of FETP training and learning events in four FETP in the Western Pacific Region. Data analysis will occur in three phases: I) we will use the constant comparison method of Charmaz's grounded theory during open coding to identify and prioritise categories and properties in the data; II) during focused coding, we will use constant comparison and Polkinghorne's analysis of narratives, comparing stories of prioritized categories, to fill out properties of those categories; III) we will use Polkinghorne's narrative analysis to construct narratives that reflect domains of interest, identifying correspondence among Carr and Kemmis's practices, understandings, and situations to explain principles and processes of learning in FETP. Ethics and dissemination. We have obtained the required ethics approvals to conduct this research at The Australian National University (2021/771) and Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare (112206). Data will not be available publicly, but anonymised findings will be shared with FETP for collaborative interpretation. Ultimately, findings and interpretations will appear in peer reviewed journals and conferences.","PeriodicalId":501387,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Medical Education","volume":"251 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOW DO FIELD EPIDEMIOLOGISTS LEARN? A PROTOCOL FOR A QUALITATIVE INQUIRY INTO LEARNING IN FIELD EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMS\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn D. Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. COVID-19 underscored the importance of field epidemiology training programs (FETP) as countries struggled with overwhelming demands. Experts are calling for more field epidemiologists with better training. Since 1951 FETP have been building public health capacities across the globe, yet explorations of learning in these programs are lacking. This qualitative study will 1) describe approaches to training field epidemiologists in FETP; 2) describe strategies for learning field epidemiology among FETP trainees; and 3) explain the principles and practices aligning training approaches with learning strategies in FETP. Methods and analysis. The research design, implementation, and interpretation are collaborative efforts with FETP trainers. Data collection will include interviews with FETP trainers and trainees and participant observations of FETP training and learning events in four FETP in the Western Pacific Region. Data analysis will occur in three phases: I) we will use the constant comparison method of Charmaz's grounded theory during open coding to identify and prioritise categories and properties in the data; II) during focused coding, we will use constant comparison and Polkinghorne's analysis of narratives, comparing stories of prioritized categories, to fill out properties of those categories; III) we will use Polkinghorne's narrative analysis to construct narratives that reflect domains of interest, identifying correspondence among Carr and Kemmis's practices, understandings, and situations to explain principles and processes of learning in FETP. Ethics and dissemination. We have obtained the required ethics approvals to conduct this research at The Australian National University (2021/771) and Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare (112206). Data will not be available publicly, but anonymised findings will be shared with FETP for collaborative interpretation. Ultimately, findings and interpretations will appear in peer reviewed journals and conferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。COVID-19 强调了现场流行病学培训计划 (FETP) 的重要性,因为各国都在努力应对巨大的需求。专家们呼吁培养更多的实地流行病学专家,并提供更好的培训。自 1951 年以来,野外流行病学培训计划一直在全球范围内培养公共卫生能力,但却缺乏对这些计划中学习内容的探索。这项定性研究将:1)描述 FETP 培训现场流行病学家的方法;2)描述 FETP 学员学习现场流行病学的策略;3)解释 FETP 培训方法与学习策略相一致的原则和做法。方法与分析。研究的设计、实施和解释都是与 FETP 培训人员合作完成的。数据收集工作将包括采访 FETP 培训师和学员,以及对西太平洋地区四个 FETP 的 FETP 培训和学习活动进行观察。数据分析将分三个阶段进行:I) 在开放式编码过程中,我们将使用查尔马兹的基础理论中的不断比较法来确定数据中的类别和属性并排出优先次序;II) 在集中式编码过程中,我们将使用不断比较法和波尔金霍恩的叙事分析法,比较已排出优先次序的类别中的故事,以填补这些类别的属性;III)我们将使用波金霍恩的叙事分析来构建反映相关领域的叙事,确定卡尔和凯米思的实践、理解和情境之间的对应关系,以解释 FETP 的学习原则和过程。伦理和传播。我们已获得澳大利亚国立大学(2021/771)和台湾卫生福利部(112206)的伦理批准,可以开展这项研究。我们不会公开数据,但会与 FETP 分享匿名的研究结果,以便进行合作解释。最终,研究结果和解释将出现在同行评审的期刊和会议上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HOW DO FIELD EPIDEMIOLOGISTS LEARN? A PROTOCOL FOR A QUALITATIVE INQUIRY INTO LEARNING IN FIELD EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMS
Introduction. COVID-19 underscored the importance of field epidemiology training programs (FETP) as countries struggled with overwhelming demands. Experts are calling for more field epidemiologists with better training. Since 1951 FETP have been building public health capacities across the globe, yet explorations of learning in these programs are lacking. This qualitative study will 1) describe approaches to training field epidemiologists in FETP; 2) describe strategies for learning field epidemiology among FETP trainees; and 3) explain the principles and practices aligning training approaches with learning strategies in FETP. Methods and analysis. The research design, implementation, and interpretation are collaborative efforts with FETP trainers. Data collection will include interviews with FETP trainers and trainees and participant observations of FETP training and learning events in four FETP in the Western Pacific Region. Data analysis will occur in three phases: I) we will use the constant comparison method of Charmaz's grounded theory during open coding to identify and prioritise categories and properties in the data; II) during focused coding, we will use constant comparison and Polkinghorne's analysis of narratives, comparing stories of prioritized categories, to fill out properties of those categories; III) we will use Polkinghorne's narrative analysis to construct narratives that reflect domains of interest, identifying correspondence among Carr and Kemmis's practices, understandings, and situations to explain principles and processes of learning in FETP. Ethics and dissemination. We have obtained the required ethics approvals to conduct this research at The Australian National University (2021/771) and Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare (112206). Data will not be available publicly, but anonymised findings will be shared with FETP for collaborative interpretation. Ultimately, findings and interpretations will appear in peer reviewed journals and conferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信