对机器人简单前列腺切除术的耻骨后方法进行评估

Dhruv Puri, Eric Y Cho, Kian Ahmadieh, Jill C Buckley
{"title":"对机器人简单前列腺切除术的耻骨后方法进行评估","authors":"Dhruv Puri,&nbsp;Eric Y Cho,&nbsp;Kian Ahmadieh,&nbsp;Jill C Buckley","doi":"10.1016/j.urolvj.2023.100259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are several surgical options for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The retropubic approach to a robotic simple prostatectomy has been previously described as an acceptable option for patients with large prostates (greater than 80–100 g). We present 15 cases who were candidates for robotic simple prostatectomy <em>via</em> a retropubic approach.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the retropubic approach to robotic simple prostatectomy alongside relevant quantifiers of patient outcomes and quality of life measures.</p></div><div><h3>Patient and surgical procedure</h3><p>We report the case series of 15 patients diagnosed with BPH and underwent robotic simple prostatectomy <em>via</em> a retropubic approach between June 2020 and June 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean total operative time was 182.4 min (median 176 min), the mean estimated blood loss was 122 ml, the median catheter time was 9 days (commonly 7 days for patients) and the average length of stay was 35 h. The average prostate size was 107.2 g and the average resected specimen weight was 66.1 g. IPSS improved on average 8.9 points with an improvement in QOL by 2.3 points. The mean post operative post void residual volume (PVR) was 74.2 ml, and the PVR had a significant change of 279.3 ml on average when comparing pre and postoperatively. There was an improvement in urinary flow rate when comparing the preoperative and postoperative (9.4 and 13.4 ml/s, respectively). Surgical indications included 14 patients with urinary retention, three patients with a history of recurrent UTIs, and two patients with bladder stones. No transfusions were required. Postoperatively, one patient had recurrent UTIs and one had a neurogenic bladder. When assessing for postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence, none were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Utilizing a retropubic technique for a robotic assisted simple prostatectomy demonstrated excellent functional outcomes and limited risk. The superior visualization of the apex of the prostate and simple capsular closure resulted in no postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92972,"journal":{"name":"Urology video journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089723000531/pdfft?md5=eb6e6c5aa2ca2b22004e35c39b8432a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590089723000531-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the retropubic approach to robotic simple prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Dhruv Puri,&nbsp;Eric Y Cho,&nbsp;Kian Ahmadieh,&nbsp;Jill C Buckley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolvj.2023.100259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are several surgical options for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The retropubic approach to a robotic simple prostatectomy has been previously described as an acceptable option for patients with large prostates (greater than 80–100 g). We present 15 cases who were candidates for robotic simple prostatectomy <em>via</em> a retropubic approach.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the retropubic approach to robotic simple prostatectomy alongside relevant quantifiers of patient outcomes and quality of life measures.</p></div><div><h3>Patient and surgical procedure</h3><p>We report the case series of 15 patients diagnosed with BPH and underwent robotic simple prostatectomy <em>via</em> a retropubic approach between June 2020 and June 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean total operative time was 182.4 min (median 176 min), the mean estimated blood loss was 122 ml, the median catheter time was 9 days (commonly 7 days for patients) and the average length of stay was 35 h. The average prostate size was 107.2 g and the average resected specimen weight was 66.1 g. IPSS improved on average 8.9 points with an improvement in QOL by 2.3 points. The mean post operative post void residual volume (PVR) was 74.2 ml, and the PVR had a significant change of 279.3 ml on average when comparing pre and postoperatively. There was an improvement in urinary flow rate when comparing the preoperative and postoperative (9.4 and 13.4 ml/s, respectively). Surgical indications included 14 patients with urinary retention, three patients with a history of recurrent UTIs, and two patients with bladder stones. No transfusions were required. Postoperatively, one patient had recurrent UTIs and one had a neurogenic bladder. When assessing for postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence, none were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Utilizing a retropubic technique for a robotic assisted simple prostatectomy demonstrated excellent functional outcomes and limited risk. The superior visualization of the apex of the prostate and simple capsular closure resulted in no postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology video journal\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089723000531/pdfft?md5=eb6e6c5aa2ca2b22004e35c39b8432a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590089723000531-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology video journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089723000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology video journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089723000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)有多种手术选择。对于前列腺体积较大(大于 80-100 g)的患者来说,耻骨后入路机器人单纯前列腺切除术是一种可接受的选择。我们报告了15例通过耻骨后入路进行机器人单纯前列腺切除术的患者。目的描述机器人单纯前列腺切除术的耻骨后入路以及患者预后和生活质量的相关量化指标。结果手术总时间平均为 182.4 分钟(中位数为 176 分钟),估计平均失血量为 122 毫升,中位导管时间为 9 天(患者通常为 7 天),平均住院时间为 35 小时。术后平均排尿残余量(PVR)为 74.2 毫升,术前术后比较,PVR 平均有 279.3 毫升的显著变化。术前与术后相比,尿流率有所改善(分别为 9.4 毫升/秒和 13.4 毫升/秒)。手术适应症包括 14 名尿潴留患者、3 名有复发性尿道炎病史的患者和 2 名膀胱结石患者。患者无需输血。术后,一名患者出现复发性尿毒症,一名患者出现神经源性膀胱。在评估术后狭窄或新发尿失禁时,没有发现任何问题。对前列腺顶点的超强可视性和简单的包囊闭合没有导致术后狭窄或新的尿失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the retropubic approach to robotic simple prostatectomy

Background

There are several surgical options for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The retropubic approach to a robotic simple prostatectomy has been previously described as an acceptable option for patients with large prostates (greater than 80–100 g). We present 15 cases who were candidates for robotic simple prostatectomy via a retropubic approach.

Objective

To describe the retropubic approach to robotic simple prostatectomy alongside relevant quantifiers of patient outcomes and quality of life measures.

Patient and surgical procedure

We report the case series of 15 patients diagnosed with BPH and underwent robotic simple prostatectomy via a retropubic approach between June 2020 and June 2023.

Results

The mean total operative time was 182.4 min (median 176 min), the mean estimated blood loss was 122 ml, the median catheter time was 9 days (commonly 7 days for patients) and the average length of stay was 35 h. The average prostate size was 107.2 g and the average resected specimen weight was 66.1 g. IPSS improved on average 8.9 points with an improvement in QOL by 2.3 points. The mean post operative post void residual volume (PVR) was 74.2 ml, and the PVR had a significant change of 279.3 ml on average when comparing pre and postoperatively. There was an improvement in urinary flow rate when comparing the preoperative and postoperative (9.4 and 13.4 ml/s, respectively). Surgical indications included 14 patients with urinary retention, three patients with a history of recurrent UTIs, and two patients with bladder stones. No transfusions were required. Postoperatively, one patient had recurrent UTIs and one had a neurogenic bladder. When assessing for postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence, none were identified.

Conclusion

Utilizing a retropubic technique for a robotic assisted simple prostatectomy demonstrated excellent functional outcomes and limited risk. The superior visualization of the apex of the prostate and simple capsular closure resulted in no postoperative strictures or de novo urinary incontinence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology video journal
Urology video journal Nephrology, Urology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信