司法蜕变:从被动反应到主动出击,远程保护家庭免受亲密伴侣暴力侵害

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Alicia Davis, Sarah Vandenberg Van Zee, Conor Geiger
{"title":"司法蜕变:从被动反应到主动出击,远程保护家庭免受亲密伴侣暴力侵害","authors":"Alicia Davis,&nbsp;Sarah Vandenberg Van Zee,&nbsp;Conor Geiger","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote access to courts through e-filing and virtual hearings. Concurrently, courts experienced an increase in intimate partner violence cases due in part to heightened stress during the pandemic. Virtual technology became crucial for individuals seeking relief from harm when traditional support systems were limited. However, remote proceedings lack the personal connection found in-person, making it challenging to handle complex cases involving parenting and intimate partner violence. Courts must strike a balance between protecting parents and children from abuse and ensuring due process and appropriate parenting time for the accused party. Some courts have considered the user experience in intimate partner violence and parenting cases, but as remote justice become the norm, it is essential for all courts to evaluate and refine the tools, policies, and procedures put in place during the emergency response to the pandemic to be more proactive in supporting court users. State courts in Kansas, North Carolina, and Arizona are cited as examples for efforts to enhance remote justice efficiency and quality in these cases involving intimate partner violence and parenting. Further research is recommended to explore the challenges and possibilities of using virtual technology in these situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"86-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice metamorphosis: Moving from reactive to proactive strategies to remotely protect families from intimate partner violence\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Davis,&nbsp;Sarah Vandenberg Van Zee,&nbsp;Conor Geiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote access to courts through e-filing and virtual hearings. Concurrently, courts experienced an increase in intimate partner violence cases due in part to heightened stress during the pandemic. Virtual technology became crucial for individuals seeking relief from harm when traditional support systems were limited. However, remote proceedings lack the personal connection found in-person, making it challenging to handle complex cases involving parenting and intimate partner violence. Courts must strike a balance between protecting parents and children from abuse and ensuring due process and appropriate parenting time for the accused party. Some courts have considered the user experience in intimate partner violence and parenting cases, but as remote justice become the norm, it is essential for all courts to evaluate and refine the tools, policies, and procedures put in place during the emergency response to the pandemic to be more proactive in supporting court users. State courts in Kansas, North Carolina, and Arizona are cited as examples for efforts to enhance remote justice efficiency and quality in these cases involving intimate partner violence and parenting. Further research is recommended to explore the challenges and possibilities of using virtual technology in these situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"86-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大流行病加速了通过电子档案和虚拟听证会远程访问法院的采用。与此同时,法院受理的亲密伴侣暴力案件增加,部分原因是大流行病期间压力增大。在传统支持系统有限的情况下,虚拟技术对于寻求伤害救济的个人来说变得至关重要。然而,远程诉讼缺乏面对面的个人联系,这使得处理涉及养育子女和亲密伴侣暴力的复杂案件具有挑战性。法院必须在保护父母和儿童免受虐待与确保正当程序和被告方适当的育儿时间之间取得平衡。一些法院已经考虑了亲密伴侣暴力和养育子女案件中的用户体验,但随着远程司法成为常态,所有法院都必须评估和完善在大流行病应急响应期间实施的工具、政策和程序,以便更加积极主动地为法院用户提供支持。堪萨斯州、北卡罗来纳州和亚利桑那州的州立法院在这些涉及亲密伴侣暴力和养育子女的案件中努力提高远程司法的效率和质量,堪萨斯州、北卡罗来纳州和亚利桑那州的州立法院就是其中的典范。建议进一步开展研究,探索在这些情况下使用虚拟技术的挑战和可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice metamorphosis: Moving from reactive to proactive strategies to remotely protect families from intimate partner violence

The pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote access to courts through e-filing and virtual hearings. Concurrently, courts experienced an increase in intimate partner violence cases due in part to heightened stress during the pandemic. Virtual technology became crucial for individuals seeking relief from harm when traditional support systems were limited. However, remote proceedings lack the personal connection found in-person, making it challenging to handle complex cases involving parenting and intimate partner violence. Courts must strike a balance between protecting parents and children from abuse and ensuring due process and appropriate parenting time for the accused party. Some courts have considered the user experience in intimate partner violence and parenting cases, but as remote justice become the norm, it is essential for all courts to evaluate and refine the tools, policies, and procedures put in place during the emergency response to the pandemic to be more proactive in supporting court users. State courts in Kansas, North Carolina, and Arizona are cited as examples for efforts to enhance remote justice efficiency and quality in these cases involving intimate partner violence and parenting. Further research is recommended to explore the challenges and possibilities of using virtual technology in these situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信