权责发生制与现金流的关系以及对权责发生制会计的评价

Abacus Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1111/abac.12307
Hyung Il Oh, Stephen Penman
{"title":"权责发生制与现金流的关系以及对权责发生制会计的评价","authors":"Hyung Il Oh, Stephen Penman","doi":"10.1111/abac.12307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considerable research has evaluated the role of accruals in determining informative earnings, with an accrual–cash flow relation at the centre of the investigation. However, much of the research is based on a misunderstanding. First, accruals are identified as the numbers that reconcile earnings to cash flows in the cash flow statement. But these are not the non-cash accruals applied in determining earnings in the accrual accounting system; rather, they are changes in balance sheet items, most of which are the relevant accruals reduced by cash flow. Thus, they are in part determined by cash flows. Second, accruals are characterized as an adjustment to cash flows, to reduce volatility of cash flows. Consequently, a negative correlation between accruals and cash flow—the accruals–cash flow relation—has been taken as the criterion for quality accruals. However, the correlation with cash flows is spurious, for the so-called accruals are determined in part by cash flows. This paper presents a corrective analysis under which non-cash accruals are identified as the components of earnings that do not involve cash flows. With this correction, the paper then conducts empirical tests that re-examine hypotheses about accruals tested in previous research, reporting contrasting results.","PeriodicalId":501337,"journal":{"name":"Abacus","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accruals–Cash Flow Relation and the Evaluation of Accrual Accounting\",\"authors\":\"Hyung Il Oh, Stephen Penman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/abac.12307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considerable research has evaluated the role of accruals in determining informative earnings, with an accrual–cash flow relation at the centre of the investigation. However, much of the research is based on a misunderstanding. First, accruals are identified as the numbers that reconcile earnings to cash flows in the cash flow statement. But these are not the non-cash accruals applied in determining earnings in the accrual accounting system; rather, they are changes in balance sheet items, most of which are the relevant accruals reduced by cash flow. Thus, they are in part determined by cash flows. Second, accruals are characterized as an adjustment to cash flows, to reduce volatility of cash flows. Consequently, a negative correlation between accruals and cash flow—the accruals–cash flow relation—has been taken as the criterion for quality accruals. However, the correlation with cash flows is spurious, for the so-called accruals are determined in part by cash flows. This paper presents a corrective analysis under which non-cash accruals are identified as the components of earnings that do not involve cash flows. With this correction, the paper then conducts empirical tests that re-examine hypotheses about accruals tested in previous research, reporting contrasting results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abacus\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abacus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量研究评估了应计项目在决定信息收益方面的作用,应计项目与现金流的关系是研究 的核心。然而,大部分研究都是基于一种误解。首先,应计项目被认为是现金流量表中调节收益与现金流量的数字。但这些并不是权责发生制会计体系中用于确定收益的非现金应计项目;相反,它们是资产负债表项目的变化,其中大部分是由现金流冲减的相关应计项目。因此,它们在一定程度上是由现金流决定的。其次,应计项目的特点是对现金流进行调整,以减少现金流的波动。因此,应计项目与现金流之间的负相关性--应计项目与现金流的关系--被作为应计项 目质量的标准。然而,与现金流的相关性是虚假的,因为所谓的应计项目部分是由现金流决定的。本文提出了一种纠正分析,即把非现金应计项目确定为不涉及现金流的收益组成部分。有了这一修正,本文随后进行了实证检验,重新审视了以往研究中检验过的有关应计项目的假设,并报告了截然不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Accruals–Cash Flow Relation and the Evaluation of Accrual Accounting
Considerable research has evaluated the role of accruals in determining informative earnings, with an accrual–cash flow relation at the centre of the investigation. However, much of the research is based on a misunderstanding. First, accruals are identified as the numbers that reconcile earnings to cash flows in the cash flow statement. But these are not the non-cash accruals applied in determining earnings in the accrual accounting system; rather, they are changes in balance sheet items, most of which are the relevant accruals reduced by cash flow. Thus, they are in part determined by cash flows. Second, accruals are characterized as an adjustment to cash flows, to reduce volatility of cash flows. Consequently, a negative correlation between accruals and cash flow—the accruals–cash flow relation—has been taken as the criterion for quality accruals. However, the correlation with cash flows is spurious, for the so-called accruals are determined in part by cash flows. This paper presents a corrective analysis under which non-cash accruals are identified as the components of earnings that do not involve cash flows. With this correction, the paper then conducts empirical tests that re-examine hypotheses about accruals tested in previous research, reporting contrasting results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信