{"title":"我们报导第三期历史","authors":"Karl Jansen-Winkeln","doi":"10.1163/18741665-12340032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this short <em>Beiträge</em> three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.</p><p>1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ii</span>, who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">i</span>. The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ii</span>.</p><p>2. According to stela Cairo <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">je</span> 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">i</span> had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read <em>ḥtp</em> “offering,” not <em>ẖntj</em> “statue” or <em>qnyt</em> “portable image” as proposed before.</p><p>3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakôn.”</p>","PeriodicalId":41016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Egyptian History","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beiträge zur Geschichte der Dritten Zwischenzeit\",\"authors\":\"Karl Jansen-Winkeln\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18741665-12340032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this short <em>Beiträge</em> three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.</p><p>1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ii</span>, who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">i</span>. The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ii</span>.</p><p>2. According to stela Cairo <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">je</span> 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">i</span> had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read <em>ḥtp</em> “offering,” not <em>ẖntj</em> “statue” or <em>qnyt</em> “portable image” as proposed before.</p><p>3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakôn.”</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Egyptian History\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Egyptian History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Egyptian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇简短的Beiträge文章中,我们提出了与第三中间期历史相关的三点。军队抄写员Nespaqashuty的家谱资料写在卡纳克的一块残片雕像上,迄今为止一直被误解。雕像的主人不是生活在Siamun时代的Nespaqashuty二世,而是Amenemone一世的孙子,雕像可能是由他的儿子Ankhefenkhons在Osorkon二世时期奉献的。根据Cairo je 66285石碑,利比亚酋长和后来的国王Shoshenq i在阿比多斯神庙里竖立了他父亲Nimlot a的雕像。为这尊雕像设立的供品是用象形文字写成的,简单地读作ḥtp“供品”,而不是像之前提议的ẖntj“雕像”或qnyt“便携式图像”。波克里斯和沙巴科以及他们的前任特夫纳克特和皮亚基之间的时间和政治关系的某些方面,以及“Sabakôn”攻击波克里斯的假定原因,都被考虑在内。
In this short Beiträge three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.
1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty ii, who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone i. The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon ii.
2. According to stela Cairo je 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq i had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read ḥtp “offering,” not ẖntj “statue” or qnyt “portable image” as proposed before.
3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakôn.”
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Egyptian History (JEgH) aims to encourage and stimulate a focused debate on writing and interpreting Egyptian history ranging from the Neolithic foundations of Ancient Egypt to its modern reception. It covers all aspects of Ancient Egyptian history (political, social, economic, and intellectual) and of modern historiography about Ancient Egypt (methodologies, hermeneutics, interplay between historiography and other disciplines, and history of modern Egyptological historiography). The journal is open to contributions in English, German, and French.