语言与逻辑中的歧义

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Christian Wurm
{"title":"语言与逻辑中的歧义","authors":"Christian Wurm","doi":"10.1111/stul.12223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article gives an explanation of how recent results on ambiguity logics are relevant to the linguistic and philosophical theory of ambiguity. To this aim, some fundamental definitions and results are explained. We formulate and provide evidence for three main hypotheses: Firstly, ambiguity is not a vague notion. Secondly, in (explicit) reasoning with ambiguity, we always have to consider the parameter <math altimg=\"urn:x-wiley:00393193:media:stul12223:stul12223-math-0001\" display=\"inline\" location=\"graphic/stul12223-math-0001.png\" overflow=\"scroll\">\n<semantics>\n<mrow>\n<mo>±</mo>\n</mrow>\n$$ \\pm $$</annotation>\n</semantics></math>trust. Thirdly, ambiguous propositions exist, but they cannot have the same rights and properties as unambiguous propositions; rather they should be considered “second class”.","PeriodicalId":46179,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambiguity in Language and Logic\",\"authors\":\"Christian Wurm\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/stul.12223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article gives an explanation of how recent results on ambiguity logics are relevant to the linguistic and philosophical theory of ambiguity. To this aim, some fundamental definitions and results are explained. We formulate and provide evidence for three main hypotheses: Firstly, ambiguity is not a vague notion. Secondly, in (explicit) reasoning with ambiguity, we always have to consider the parameter <math altimg=\\\"urn:x-wiley:00393193:media:stul12223:stul12223-math-0001\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" location=\\\"graphic/stul12223-math-0001.png\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\">\\n<semantics>\\n<mrow>\\n<mo>±</mo>\\n</mrow>\\n$$ \\\\pm $$</annotation>\\n</semantics></math>trust. Thirdly, ambiguous propositions exist, but they cannot have the same rights and properties as unambiguous propositions; rather they should be considered “second class”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIA LINGUISTICA\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIA LINGUISTICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文解释了歧义逻辑的最新研究成果如何与歧义的语言学和哲学理论相关联。为此,解释了一些基本的定义和结果。我们为三个主要假设制定并提供证据:首先,歧义不是一个模糊的概念。其次,在有歧义的(显式)推理中,我们总是要考虑±$$ \pm $$信任参数。第三,模棱两可的命题是存在的,但它们不能具有与明确命题相同的权利和性质;相反,它们应该被视为“二等”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambiguity in Language and Logic
This article gives an explanation of how recent results on ambiguity logics are relevant to the linguistic and philosophical theory of ambiguity. To this aim, some fundamental definitions and results are explained. We formulate and provide evidence for three main hypotheses: Firstly, ambiguity is not a vague notion. Secondly, in (explicit) reasoning with ambiguity, we always have to consider the parameter ± $$ \pm $$ trust. Thirdly, ambiguous propositions exist, but they cannot have the same rights and properties as unambiguous propositions; rather they should be considered “second class”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIA LINGUISTICA
STUDIA LINGUISTICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Studia Linguistica is committed to the publication of high quality, original papers and provides an international forum for the discussion of theoretical linguistic research, primarily within the fields of grammar, cognitive semantics and language typology. The principal aim is to open a channel of communication between researchers operating in traditionally diverse fields while continuing to focus on natural language data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信