{"title":"blop:基于布尔满意度的优化循环流水线","authors":"Nicolai Fiege, Peter Zipf","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3599972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modulo scheduling is the premier technique for throughput maximization of loops in high-level synthesis by interleaving consecutive loop iterations. The number of clock cycles between data insertions is called initiation interval (II). For throughput maximization, this value should be as low as possible; therefore its minimization is the main optimization goal. </p><p>Despite its long historical existence, modulo scheduling always remained a relevant research topic over the last years with many exact and heuristic algorithms available in literature. </p><p>Nevertheless, we are able to leverage the scalability of modern Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers to outperform state-of-the-art ILP-based algorithms for latency-optimal modulo scheduling for both integer and rational IIs. Our algorithm is able to compute valid modulo schedules for the whole CHStone and MachSuite benchmark suites, with 99% of the solutions being proven to be throughput-optimal for a timeout of only 10 min per candidate II. For various time limits, not a single tested scheduler from the state-of-the-art is able to compute more verified optimal solutions or even a single schedule with a higher throughput than our proposed approach. Using an HLS toolflow we show that our algorithm can be effectively used to generate Pareto-optimal FPGA implementations regarding throughput and resource usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49248,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BLOOP: Boolean Satisifiability-based Optimized Loop Pipelining\",\"authors\":\"Nicolai Fiege, Peter Zipf\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3599972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Modulo scheduling is the premier technique for throughput maximization of loops in high-level synthesis by interleaving consecutive loop iterations. The number of clock cycles between data insertions is called initiation interval (II). For throughput maximization, this value should be as low as possible; therefore its minimization is the main optimization goal. </p><p>Despite its long historical existence, modulo scheduling always remained a relevant research topic over the last years with many exact and heuristic algorithms available in literature. </p><p>Nevertheless, we are able to leverage the scalability of modern Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers to outperform state-of-the-art ILP-based algorithms for latency-optimal modulo scheduling for both integer and rational IIs. Our algorithm is able to compute valid modulo schedules for the whole CHStone and MachSuite benchmark suites, with 99% of the solutions being proven to be throughput-optimal for a timeout of only 10 min per candidate II. For various time limits, not a single tested scheduler from the state-of-the-art is able to compute more verified optimal solutions or even a single schedule with a higher throughput than our proposed approach. Using an HLS toolflow we show that our algorithm can be effectively used to generate Pareto-optimal FPGA implementations regarding throughput and resource usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3599972\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3599972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modulo scheduling is the premier technique for throughput maximization of loops in high-level synthesis by interleaving consecutive loop iterations. The number of clock cycles between data insertions is called initiation interval (II). For throughput maximization, this value should be as low as possible; therefore its minimization is the main optimization goal.
Despite its long historical existence, modulo scheduling always remained a relevant research topic over the last years with many exact and heuristic algorithms available in literature.
Nevertheless, we are able to leverage the scalability of modern Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers to outperform state-of-the-art ILP-based algorithms for latency-optimal modulo scheduling for both integer and rational IIs. Our algorithm is able to compute valid modulo schedules for the whole CHStone and MachSuite benchmark suites, with 99% of the solutions being proven to be throughput-optimal for a timeout of only 10 min per candidate II. For various time limits, not a single tested scheduler from the state-of-the-art is able to compute more verified optimal solutions or even a single schedule with a higher throughput than our proposed approach. Using an HLS toolflow we show that our algorithm can be effectively used to generate Pareto-optimal FPGA implementations regarding throughput and resource usage.
期刊介绍:
TRETS is the top journal focusing on research in, on, and with reconfigurable systems and on their underlying technology. The scope, rationale, and coverage by other journals are often limited to particular aspects of reconfigurable technology or reconfigurable systems. TRETS is a journal that covers reconfigurability in its own right.
Topics that would be appropriate for TRETS would include all levels of reconfigurable system abstractions and all aspects of reconfigurable technology including platforms, programming environments and application successes that support these systems for computing or other applications.
-The board and systems architectures of a reconfigurable platform.
-Programming environments of reconfigurable systems, especially those designed for use with reconfigurable systems that will lead to increased programmer productivity.
-Languages and compilers for reconfigurable systems.
-Logic synthesis and related tools, as they relate to reconfigurable systems.
-Applications on which success can be demonstrated.
The underlying technology from which reconfigurable systems are developed. (Currently this technology is that of FPGAs, but research on the nature and use of follow-on technologies is appropriate for TRETS.)
In considering whether a paper is suitable for TRETS, the foremost question should be whether reconfigurability has been essential to success. Topics such as architecture, programming languages, compilers, and environments, logic synthesis, and high performance applications are all suitable if the context is appropriate. For example, an architecture for an embedded application that happens to use FPGAs is not necessarily suitable for TRETS, but an architecture using FPGAs for which the reconfigurability of the FPGAs is an inherent part of the specifications (perhaps due to a need for re-use on multiple applications) would be appropriate for TRETS.