一种保护隐私记录链接的漏洞评估框架

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Anushka Vidanage, Peter Christen, Thilina Ranbaduge, Rainer Schnell
{"title":"一种保护隐私记录链接的漏洞评估框架","authors":"Anushka Vidanage, Peter Christen, Thilina Ranbaduge, Rainer Schnell","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The linkage of records to identify common entities across multiple data sources has gained increasing interest over the last few decades. In the absence of unique entity identifiers, quasi-identifying attributes such as personal names and addresses are generally used to link records. Due to privacy concerns that arise when such sensitive information is used, privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods have been proposed to link records without revealing any sensitive or confidential information about these records. Popular PPRL methods such as Bloom filter encoding, however, are known to be susceptible to various privacy attacks. Therefore, a systematic analysis of the privacy risks associated with sensitive databases as well as PPRL methods used in linkage projects is of great importance. In this article we present a novel framework to assess the vulnerabilities of sensitive databases and existing PPRL encoding methods. We discuss five types of vulnerabilities: frequency, length, co-occurrence, similarity, and similarity neighborhood, of both plaintext and encoded values that an adversary can exploit in order to reidentify sensitive plaintext values from encoded data. In an experimental evaluation we assess the vulnerabilities of two databases using five existing PPRL encoding methods. This evaluation shows that our proposed framework can be used in real-world linkage applications to assess the vulnerabilities associated with sensitive databases to be linked, as well as with PPRL encoding methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":56050,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Privacy-preserving Record Linkage\",\"authors\":\"Anushka Vidanage, Peter Christen, Thilina Ranbaduge, Rainer Schnell\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The linkage of records to identify common entities across multiple data sources has gained increasing interest over the last few decades. In the absence of unique entity identifiers, quasi-identifying attributes such as personal names and addresses are generally used to link records. Due to privacy concerns that arise when such sensitive information is used, privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods have been proposed to link records without revealing any sensitive or confidential information about these records. Popular PPRL methods such as Bloom filter encoding, however, are known to be susceptible to various privacy attacks. Therefore, a systematic analysis of the privacy risks associated with sensitive databases as well as PPRL methods used in linkage projects is of great importance. In this article we present a novel framework to assess the vulnerabilities of sensitive databases and existing PPRL encoding methods. We discuss five types of vulnerabilities: frequency, length, co-occurrence, similarity, and similarity neighborhood, of both plaintext and encoded values that an adversary can exploit in order to reidentify sensitive plaintext values from encoded data. In an experimental evaluation we assess the vulnerabilities of two databases using five existing PPRL encoding methods. This evaluation shows that our proposed framework can be used in real-world linkage applications to assess the vulnerabilities associated with sensitive databases to be linked, as well as with PPRL encoding methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589641\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,通过记录链接来识别跨多个数据源的公共实体已经获得了越来越多的关注。在没有唯一实体标识符的情况下,通常使用个人姓名和地址等准标识属性来链接记录。由于在使用这些敏感信息时会出现隐私问题,因此提出了隐私保护记录链接(PPRL)方法,以在不泄露这些记录的任何敏感或机密信息的情况下链接记录。然而,众所周知,流行的PPRL方法(如Bloom过滤器编码)容易受到各种隐私攻击。因此,系统地分析与敏感数据库相关的隐私风险以及在关联项目中使用的PPRL方法是非常重要的。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的框架来评估敏感数据库和现有的PPRL编码方法的漏洞。我们讨论了五种类型的漏洞:频率、长度、共存、相似性和相似性邻域,攻击者可以利用明文和编码值的漏洞,以便从编码数据中重新识别敏感的明文值。在实验评估中,我们使用五种现有的PPRL编码方法对两个数据库的漏洞进行了评估。这一评估表明,我们提出的框架可以在现实世界的链接应用中使用,以评估与要链接的敏感数据库以及PPRL编码方法相关的漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Privacy-preserving Record Linkage

The linkage of records to identify common entities across multiple data sources has gained increasing interest over the last few decades. In the absence of unique entity identifiers, quasi-identifying attributes such as personal names and addresses are generally used to link records. Due to privacy concerns that arise when such sensitive information is used, privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) methods have been proposed to link records without revealing any sensitive or confidential information about these records. Popular PPRL methods such as Bloom filter encoding, however, are known to be susceptible to various privacy attacks. Therefore, a systematic analysis of the privacy risks associated with sensitive databases as well as PPRL methods used in linkage projects is of great importance. In this article we present a novel framework to assess the vulnerabilities of sensitive databases and existing PPRL encoding methods. We discuss five types of vulnerabilities: frequency, length, co-occurrence, similarity, and similarity neighborhood, of both plaintext and encoded values that an adversary can exploit in order to reidentify sensitive plaintext values from encoded data. In an experimental evaluation we assess the vulnerabilities of two databases using five existing PPRL encoding methods. This evaluation shows that our proposed framework can be used in real-world linkage applications to assess the vulnerabilities associated with sensitive databases to be linked, as well as with PPRL encoding methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS) (formerly known as TISSEC) publishes high-quality research results in the fields of information and system security and privacy. Studies addressing all aspects of these fields are welcomed, ranging from technologies, to systems and applications, to the crafting of policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信