人口健康研究中衡量当地种族和民族居住隔离的现行方法

3区 医学
Kiarri N. Kershaw, Sharrelle Barber, Margaret T. Hicken
{"title":"人口健康研究中衡量当地种族和民族居住隔离的现行方法","authors":"Kiarri N. Kershaw, Sharrelle Barber, Margaret T. Hicken","doi":"10.1007/s40471-023-00335-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Segregation has traditionally been measured at the metropolitan area or county level, but a growing number of population health studies have measured segregation at the neighborhood or local level. In this review, we highlight the ways local racial and ethnic residential segregation has been measured in recently published population health studies (June 1, 2019–June 30, 2022).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>We identified 40 local segregation studies based on our search criteria. The majority used racial or ethnic composition to measure segregation, but several additional measures were identified that reflect different dimensions of segregation and the segregation process.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>The choice of how best to operationalize segregation should be guided by the historical and geographic context surrounding the population under study. Our findings highlight several options available to support the development of meaningful and useful measures of segregation to study their impact on health inequities across a diverse range of outcomes and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Approaches to Measuring Local Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in Population Health Studies\",\"authors\":\"Kiarri N. Kershaw, Sharrelle Barber, Margaret T. Hicken\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-023-00335-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Segregation has traditionally been measured at the metropolitan area or county level, but a growing number of population health studies have measured segregation at the neighborhood or local level. In this review, we highlight the ways local racial and ethnic residential segregation has been measured in recently published population health studies (June 1, 2019–June 30, 2022).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent Findings</h3><p>We identified 40 local segregation studies based on our search criteria. The majority used racial or ethnic composition to measure segregation, but several additional measures were identified that reflect different dimensions of segregation and the segregation process.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>The choice of how best to operationalize segregation should be guided by the historical and geographic context surrounding the population under study. Our findings highlight several options available to support the development of meaningful and useful measures of segregation to study their impact on health inequities across a diverse range of outcomes and settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-023-00335-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-023-00335-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,隔离是在大都市区或县一级测量的,但越来越多的人口健康研究在社区或地方一级测量了隔离。在这篇综述中,我们重点介绍了最近发表的人口健康研究(2019年6月1日至2022年6月30日)中测量当地种族和民族居住隔离的方法。最近的发现根据我们的搜索标准,我们确定了40个地方隔离研究。大多数人使用种族或民族构成来衡量种族隔离,但还发现了一些反映种族隔离和种族隔离过程的不同方面的额外措施。如何最好地实施隔离应以所研究人口的历史和地理背景为指导。我们的研究结果强调了几种可用的选择,以支持制定有意义和有用的隔离措施,以研究它们在各种结果和环境中对卫生不平等的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current Approaches to Measuring Local Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in Population Health Studies

Current Approaches to Measuring Local Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in Population Health Studies

Purpose of Review

Segregation has traditionally been measured at the metropolitan area or county level, but a growing number of population health studies have measured segregation at the neighborhood or local level. In this review, we highlight the ways local racial and ethnic residential segregation has been measured in recently published population health studies (June 1, 2019–June 30, 2022).

Recent Findings

We identified 40 local segregation studies based on our search criteria. The majority used racial or ethnic composition to measure segregation, but several additional measures were identified that reflect different dimensions of segregation and the segregation process.

Summary

The choice of how best to operationalize segregation should be guided by the historical and geographic context surrounding the population under study. Our findings highlight several options available to support the development of meaningful and useful measures of segregation to study their impact on health inequities across a diverse range of outcomes and settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信