{"title":"量词小品类型学的扩展","authors":"Ian L. Kirby","doi":"10.1007/s11049-023-09589-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Sakha particle <i>da(ɣanï)</i> has a restricted, semantically varied distribution. It appears in three main roles: negative polarity item (NPIs), a marker of scalar focus, and doubled in coordination constructions. In coordination <i>X da(ɣanï) Y da(ɣanï)</i> means ‘both X and Y’ in positive sentences, but ‘neither X nor Y’ in negative sentences. Following from the assumption that NPIs denote low-point existentials, it is surprising to find a particle that is involved in these as well as ‘both…and’ coordination. While there are quantifier particles in other languages which overlap with all of <i>da(ɣanï)</i>’s uses, these typically these serve far more roles. One such common role that <i>da(ɣanï)</i> lacks is a basic additive ‘too’ reading, though an additive reading emerges with scalar focus. I argue that <i>da(ɣanï)</i> is an element which combines with an host that has semantic alternatives and makes them <span>obligatorily active</span>, in the sense of Chierchia (2013). When it combines with a low-point existential, this has the effect of creating NPIs. The ‘both…and’ reading is argued to be the result of <i>da(ɣanï)</i> inducing an additive post-supposition. However, a unary ‘too’ function is blocked by the additive presupposition of another particle <i>emie</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18975,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending the typology of quantifier particles\",\"authors\":\"Ian L. Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11049-023-09589-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Sakha particle <i>da(ɣanï)</i> has a restricted, semantically varied distribution. It appears in three main roles: negative polarity item (NPIs), a marker of scalar focus, and doubled in coordination constructions. In coordination <i>X da(ɣanï) Y da(ɣanï)</i> means ‘both X and Y’ in positive sentences, but ‘neither X nor Y’ in negative sentences. Following from the assumption that NPIs denote low-point existentials, it is surprising to find a particle that is involved in these as well as ‘both…and’ coordination. While there are quantifier particles in other languages which overlap with all of <i>da(ɣanï)</i>’s uses, these typically these serve far more roles. One such common role that <i>da(ɣanï)</i> lacks is a basic additive ‘too’ reading, though an additive reading emerges with scalar focus. I argue that <i>da(ɣanï)</i> is an element which combines with an host that has semantic alternatives and makes them <span>obligatorily active</span>, in the sense of Chierchia (2013). When it combines with a low-point existential, this has the effect of creating NPIs. The ‘both…and’ reading is argued to be the result of <i>da(ɣanï)</i> inducing an additive post-supposition. However, a unary ‘too’ function is blocked by the additive presupposition of another particle <i>emie</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-023-09589-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-023-09589-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Sakha粒子da(^ anï)具有受限制的、语义变化的分布。它主要在三个方面发挥作用:负极性项(npi)、标量焦点的标记以及在配位结构中的双重作用。在配位中,X da(anï) Y da(anï)在肯定句中表示“X和Y”,但在否定句中表示“既不是X也不是Y”。根据npi表示低点存在的假设,令人惊讶的是发现一个粒子参与了这些以及“两者”和“协调”。虽然在其他语言中有一些量词粒子与所有的da(^ anï)的用法重叠,但这些通常具有更多的作用。da(æ anï)缺少的一个常见角色是基本的加性“too”读取,尽管加性读取出现了标量焦点。我认为,在Chierchia(2013)的意义上,da(* anï)是一个元素,它与具有语义替代的宿主结合,并使它们具有强制性的活动。当它与低点存在主义相结合时,就会产生npi的效果。“both…and”的读法被认为是da(^ anï)诱导加性后假设的结果。然而,一元“too”函数被另一个粒子emie的加性假设所阻塞。
The Sakha particle da(ɣanï) has a restricted, semantically varied distribution. It appears in three main roles: negative polarity item (NPIs), a marker of scalar focus, and doubled in coordination constructions. In coordination X da(ɣanï) Y da(ɣanï) means ‘both X and Y’ in positive sentences, but ‘neither X nor Y’ in negative sentences. Following from the assumption that NPIs denote low-point existentials, it is surprising to find a particle that is involved in these as well as ‘both…and’ coordination. While there are quantifier particles in other languages which overlap with all of da(ɣanï)’s uses, these typically these serve far more roles. One such common role that da(ɣanï) lacks is a basic additive ‘too’ reading, though an additive reading emerges with scalar focus. I argue that da(ɣanï) is an element which combines with an host that has semantic alternatives and makes them obligatorily active, in the sense of Chierchia (2013). When it combines with a low-point existential, this has the effect of creating NPIs. The ‘both…and’ reading is argued to be the result of da(ɣanï) inducing an additive post-supposition. However, a unary ‘too’ function is blocked by the additive presupposition of another particle emie.
期刊介绍:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory provides a forum for the discussion of theoretical research that pays close attention to natural language data, offering a channel of communication between researchers of a variety of points of view. The journal actively seeks to bridge the gap between descriptive work and work of a highly theoretical, less empirically oriented nature. In attempting to strike this balance, the journal presents work that makes complex language data accessible to those unfamiliar with the language area being studied and work that makes complex theoretical positions more accessible to those working outside the theoretical framework under review. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory features: generative studies on the syntax, semantics, phonology, morphology, and other aspects of natural language; surveys of recent theoretical developments that facilitate accessibility for a graduate student readership; reactions/replies to recent papers book reviews of important linguistics titles; special topic issues. Springer fully understands that access to your work is important to you and to the sponsors of your research. We are listed as a green publisher in the SHERPA/RoMEO database, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights. Read more about author''s rights on: http://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/authors-rights