庞特的占领:船东替代责任的发展及其在罗马-荷兰法中的限制

Tim Lubbers
{"title":"庞特的占领:船东替代责任的发展及其在罗马-荷兰法中的限制","authors":"Tim Lubbers","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20220012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman <em>Ponte</em>, which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The <em>Ponte</em> case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship <em>Levrette</em> by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the <em>Ponte</em> and the <em>Levrette</em> case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The capture of the Ponte: the development of vicarious liability of shipowners and its limitation in Roman-Dutch law\",\"authors\":\"Tim Lubbers\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-20220012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h2>Summary</h2><p>In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman <em>Ponte</em>, which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The <em>Ponte</em> case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship <em>Levrette</em> by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the <em>Ponte</em> and the <em>Levrette</em> case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20220012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20220012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1599年,荷兰海盗Melchior van den Kerckhoven非法捕获威尼斯商人Ponte,导致荷兰、泽兰和西弗里斯兰最高法院进行了广泛的法律诉讼。庞特案很快成为讨论船东对其船长的非法行为的替代责任的中心,更重要的是,这种责任限制在他们的船舶和货物的价值上。在这些讨论中,次要的角色被保留给1610年荷兰商人捕获法国船Levrette的案件。基于广泛的档案研究,本文对Ponte和Levrette案件的事实和诉讼程序进行了详细的重建,并阐述了罗马-荷兰律师如何利用这些案件来确定船东对其船长的非法行为的有限责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The capture of the Ponte: the development of vicarious liability of shipowners and its limitation in Roman-Dutch law

Summary

In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman Ponte, which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The Ponte case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship Levrette by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the Ponte and the Levrette case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信