加密货币清洗交易:直接vs.间接估计

Brett Hemenway Falk, Gerry Tsoukalas, Niuniu Zhang
{"title":"加密货币清洗交易:直接vs.间接估计","authors":"Brett Hemenway Falk, Gerry Tsoukalas, Niuniu Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2311.18717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies using indirect statistical methods estimate that around 70% of\ntraded value on centralized crypto exchanges like Binance, can be characterized\nas wash trading. This paper turns to NFT markets, where transaction\ntransparency, including analysis of roundtrip trades and common wallet\nactivities, allows for more accurate direct estimation methods to be applied.\nWe find roughly 30% of NFT volume and between 45-95% of traded value, involve\nwash trading. More importantly, our approach enables a critical evaluation of\ncommon indirect estimation methods used in the literature. We find major\ndifferences in their effectiveness; some failing entirely. Roundedness filters,\nlike those used in Cong et al. (2023), emerge as the most accurate. In fact,\nthe two approaches can be closely aligned via hyper-parameter optimization if\ndirect data is available.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crypto Wash Trading: Direct vs. Indirect Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Brett Hemenway Falk, Gerry Tsoukalas, Niuniu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.18717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent studies using indirect statistical methods estimate that around 70% of\\ntraded value on centralized crypto exchanges like Binance, can be characterized\\nas wash trading. This paper turns to NFT markets, where transaction\\ntransparency, including analysis of roundtrip trades and common wallet\\nactivities, allows for more accurate direct estimation methods to be applied.\\nWe find roughly 30% of NFT volume and between 45-95% of traded value, involve\\nwash trading. More importantly, our approach enables a critical evaluation of\\ncommon indirect estimation methods used in the literature. We find major\\ndifferences in their effectiveness; some failing entirely. Roundedness filters,\\nlike those used in Cong et al. (2023), emerge as the most accurate. In fact,\\nthe two approaches can be closely aligned via hyper-parameter optimization if\\ndirect data is available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.18717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.18717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近使用间接统计方法的研究估计,在像币安这样的集中式加密货币交易所,大约70%的交易价值可以被描述为虚假交易。本文转向NFT市场,其中交易透明度,包括往返交易和公共钱包活动的分析,允许应用更准确的直接估计方法。我们发现大约30%的NFT交易量和45-95%的交易价值涉及洗白交易。更重要的是,我们的方法能够对文献中使用的常见间接估计方法进行批判性评估。我们发现它们的有效性存在很大差异;有些完全失败了。圆形过滤器,就像Cong等人(2023)使用的那样,是最准确的。事实上,如果有直接数据,这两种方法可以通过超参数优化紧密结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crypto Wash Trading: Direct vs. Indirect Estimation
Recent studies using indirect statistical methods estimate that around 70% of traded value on centralized crypto exchanges like Binance, can be characterized as wash trading. This paper turns to NFT markets, where transaction transparency, including analysis of roundtrip trades and common wallet activities, allows for more accurate direct estimation methods to be applied. We find roughly 30% of NFT volume and between 45-95% of traded value, involve wash trading. More importantly, our approach enables a critical evaluation of common indirect estimation methods used in the literature. We find major differences in their effectiveness; some failing entirely. Roundedness filters, like those used in Cong et al. (2023), emerge as the most accurate. In fact, the two approaches can be closely aligned via hyper-parameter optimization if direct data is available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信