揭示植物生物聚合物化学中的系统发育信号:孢粉学研究中孢粉素分离方法的比较

IF 2.3 2区 地球科学 Q1 PALEONTOLOGY
Palaeontology Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1111/pala.12683
Phillip E. Jardine, Matthew S. Kent, Wesley T. Fraser, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Barry H. Lomax
{"title":"揭示植物生物聚合物化学中的系统发育信号:孢粉学研究中孢粉素分离方法的比较","authors":"Phillip E. Jardine, Matthew S. Kent, Wesley T. Fraser, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Barry H. Lomax","doi":"10.1111/pala.12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sporomorphs (pollen and spores) are a mainstay of research into past vegetation, and increasingly sporomorph chemistry is being used as a palaeoecological tool. To make extant sporomorphs directly comparable to fossil specimens, fresh material is processed to remove labile compounds and isolate the sporopollenin wall. A range of processing approaches are currently in use, but the chemistries produced by these different techniques have not yet been compared across a range of taxa. It is therefore not clear how they compare in terms of efficiently isolating sporopollenin without changing its chemical structure, and what impact they have on relative chemical similarities and differences among taxa (i.e. whether more closely related species will always appear chemically more similar, regardless of how they have been processed). Here, we test this by applying five different processing approaches to sporomorphs from 15 taxa from across the vascular plant phylogeny. We show that each approach has its own idiosyncrasies in terms of impacts on sporomorph chemistry. For the most part a common pattern of among-taxon chemical variability is uncovered, and a phylogenetic signal within sporopollenin chemistry is supported. Working with spectral derivatives generally increases agreement among the different processing approaches, but decreases the strength of the phylogenetic signal. No one processing approach is ideal, and the choice of which to use is likely to depend on the goal of the study, the type and quantity of material being processed, and the laboratory facilities available for processing.","PeriodicalId":56272,"journal":{"name":"Palaeontology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering a phylogenetic signal in plant biopolymer chemistry: a comparison of sporopollenin isolation approaches for use in palynological research\",\"authors\":\"Phillip E. Jardine, Matthew S. Kent, Wesley T. Fraser, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Barry H. Lomax\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pala.12683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sporomorphs (pollen and spores) are a mainstay of research into past vegetation, and increasingly sporomorph chemistry is being used as a palaeoecological tool. To make extant sporomorphs directly comparable to fossil specimens, fresh material is processed to remove labile compounds and isolate the sporopollenin wall. A range of processing approaches are currently in use, but the chemistries produced by these different techniques have not yet been compared across a range of taxa. It is therefore not clear how they compare in terms of efficiently isolating sporopollenin without changing its chemical structure, and what impact they have on relative chemical similarities and differences among taxa (i.e. whether more closely related species will always appear chemically more similar, regardless of how they have been processed). Here, we test this by applying five different processing approaches to sporomorphs from 15 taxa from across the vascular plant phylogeny. We show that each approach has its own idiosyncrasies in terms of impacts on sporomorph chemistry. For the most part a common pattern of among-taxon chemical variability is uncovered, and a phylogenetic signal within sporopollenin chemistry is supported. Working with spectral derivatives generally increases agreement among the different processing approaches, but decreases the strength of the phylogenetic signal. No one processing approach is ideal, and the choice of which to use is likely to depend on the goal of the study, the type and quantity of material being processed, and the laboratory facilities available for processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palaeontology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palaeontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12683\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孢子形态(花粉和孢子)是研究过去植被的支柱,并且越来越多的孢子形态化学被用作古生态学工具。为了使现存的孢子体直接与化石标本相比较,对新鲜材料进行处理以去除不稳定的化合物并分离孢子孢粉壁。目前正在使用一系列处理方法,但这些不同技术产生的化学物质尚未在一系列分类群中进行比较。因此,在不改变其化学结构的情况下如何有效地分离孢粉素,以及它们对分类群之间的相对化学相似性和差异有何影响(即,是否更密切相关的物种总是在化学上更相似,无论它们如何加工),目前尚不清楚。在这里,我们通过对来自维管植物系统发育的15个类群的孢子形采用五种不同的处理方法来验证这一点。我们表明,每种方法在对孢子形态化学的影响方面都有自己的特点。在大多数情况下,揭示了分类群间化学变异的共同模式,并支持孢子孢粉化学中的系统发育信号。使用谱导数通常会增加不同处理方法之间的一致性,但会降低系统发育信号的强度。没有一种加工方法是理想的,使用哪种方法的选择可能取决于研究的目标、被加工材料的类型和数量,以及可用于加工的实验室设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering a phylogenetic signal in plant biopolymer chemistry: a comparison of sporopollenin isolation approaches for use in palynological research
Sporomorphs (pollen and spores) are a mainstay of research into past vegetation, and increasingly sporomorph chemistry is being used as a palaeoecological tool. To make extant sporomorphs directly comparable to fossil specimens, fresh material is processed to remove labile compounds and isolate the sporopollenin wall. A range of processing approaches are currently in use, but the chemistries produced by these different techniques have not yet been compared across a range of taxa. It is therefore not clear how they compare in terms of efficiently isolating sporopollenin without changing its chemical structure, and what impact they have on relative chemical similarities and differences among taxa (i.e. whether more closely related species will always appear chemically more similar, regardless of how they have been processed). Here, we test this by applying five different processing approaches to sporomorphs from 15 taxa from across the vascular plant phylogeny. We show that each approach has its own idiosyncrasies in terms of impacts on sporomorph chemistry. For the most part a common pattern of among-taxon chemical variability is uncovered, and a phylogenetic signal within sporopollenin chemistry is supported. Working with spectral derivatives generally increases agreement among the different processing approaches, but decreases the strength of the phylogenetic signal. No one processing approach is ideal, and the choice of which to use is likely to depend on the goal of the study, the type and quantity of material being processed, and the laboratory facilities available for processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palaeontology
Palaeontology 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Palaeontology publishes a wide variety of papers on palaeontological topics covering: palaeozoology palaeobotany systematic studies palaeoecology micropalaeontology palaeobiogeography functional morphology stratigraphy taxonomy taphonomy palaeoenvironmental reconstruction palaeoclimate analysis and biomineralization studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信