DeepScraper:一个完整而高效的推文抓取方法,使用身份验证的多处理

IF 2.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jaebeom You , Kisung Lee , Hyuk-Yoon Kwon
{"title":"DeepScraper:一个完整而高效的推文抓取方法,使用身份验证的多处理","authors":"Jaebeom You ,&nbsp;Kisung Lee ,&nbsp;Hyuk-Yoon Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.datak.2023.102260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we propose a scraping method for collecting tweets, which we call <em>DeepScraper</em><span>. DeepScraper provides the complete scraping for the entire tweets written by a certain group of users or them containing search keywords<span> with a fast speed. To improve the crawling speed of DeepScraper, we devise a multiprocessing architecture while providing authentication<span> to the multiple processes based on the simulation of the user access behavior to Twitter. This allows us to maximize the parallelism of crawling even in a single machine. Through extensive experiments, we show that DeepScraper can crawl the entire tweets of 99 users, which amounts to 5,798,052 tweets while Twitter standard API can crawl only 243,650 tweets of them due to the constraints of the number of tweets to scrape. In other words, DeepScraper could collect 23.7 times more tweets for the 99 users than the standard API. We also show the efficiency of DeepScraper. First, we show the effect of the authenticated multiprocessing by showing that it increases the crawling speed from 2.03</span></span></span><span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span>10.57 times as the number of running processes increases from 2 to 32 compared to DeepScraper with a single process. Then, we compare the crawling speed of DeepScraper with the existing studies. The result shows that DeepScraper is compared to even Twitter standard APIs and Twitter4J while DeepScraper can scrape much more tweets than them. Furthermore, DeepScraper is much faster than Twitter Scrapy roughly 3.69 times while both can scrape the entire tweets for the target users or keywords.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55184,"journal":{"name":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DeepScraper: A complete and efficient tweet scraping method using authenticated multiprocessing\",\"authors\":\"Jaebeom You ,&nbsp;Kisung Lee ,&nbsp;Hyuk-Yoon Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.datak.2023.102260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we propose a scraping method for collecting tweets, which we call <em>DeepScraper</em><span>. DeepScraper provides the complete scraping for the entire tweets written by a certain group of users or them containing search keywords<span> with a fast speed. To improve the crawling speed of DeepScraper, we devise a multiprocessing architecture while providing authentication<span> to the multiple processes based on the simulation of the user access behavior to Twitter. This allows us to maximize the parallelism of crawling even in a single machine. Through extensive experiments, we show that DeepScraper can crawl the entire tweets of 99 users, which amounts to 5,798,052 tweets while Twitter standard API can crawl only 243,650 tweets of them due to the constraints of the number of tweets to scrape. In other words, DeepScraper could collect 23.7 times more tweets for the 99 users than the standard API. We also show the efficiency of DeepScraper. First, we show the effect of the authenticated multiprocessing by showing that it increases the crawling speed from 2.03</span></span></span><span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span>10.57 times as the number of running processes increases from 2 to 32 compared to DeepScraper with a single process. Then, we compare the crawling speed of DeepScraper with the existing studies. The result shows that DeepScraper is compared to even Twitter standard APIs and Twitter4J while DeepScraper can scrape much more tweets than them. Furthermore, DeepScraper is much faster than Twitter Scrapy roughly 3.69 times while both can scrape the entire tweets for the target users or keywords.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data & Knowledge Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data & Knowledge Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X23001209\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X23001209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种收集推文的抓取方法,我们称之为DeepScraper。DeepScraper提供了对某一组用户或他们所写的包含搜索关键字的整个推文的完整抓取,速度很快。为了提高DeepScraper的爬行速度,我们设计了一个多处理架构,同时基于Twitter用户访问行为的模拟为多个进程提供身份验证。这允许我们在单个机器上最大化爬行的并行性。通过大量的实验,我们发现DeepScraper可以抓取99个用户的全部推文,总计5798052条推文,而Twitter标准API由于抓取推文数量的限制,只能抓取其中的243650条推文。换句话说,DeepScraper可以为99个用户收集比标准API多23.7倍的推文。我们还展示了DeepScraper的效率。首先,我们展示了经过身份验证的多处理的效果,与使用单个进程的DeepScraper相比,当运行进程的数量从2增加到32时,它将爬行速度从2.03倍提高到10.57倍。然后,我们将DeepScraper的爬行速度与已有研究进行了比较。结果表明,DeepScraper甚至可以与Twitter标准api和Twitter4J进行比较,而DeepScraper可以抓取比它们更多的推文。此外,DeepScraper比Twitter Scrapy快得多,大约是3.69倍,而两者都可以为目标用户或关键字抓取整条推文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DeepScraper: A complete and efficient tweet scraping method using authenticated multiprocessing

In this paper, we propose a scraping method for collecting tweets, which we call DeepScraper. DeepScraper provides the complete scraping for the entire tweets written by a certain group of users or them containing search keywords with a fast speed. To improve the crawling speed of DeepScraper, we devise a multiprocessing architecture while providing authentication to the multiple processes based on the simulation of the user access behavior to Twitter. This allows us to maximize the parallelism of crawling even in a single machine. Through extensive experiments, we show that DeepScraper can crawl the entire tweets of 99 users, which amounts to 5,798,052 tweets while Twitter standard API can crawl only 243,650 tweets of them due to the constraints of the number of tweets to scrape. In other words, DeepScraper could collect 23.7 times more tweets for the 99 users than the standard API. We also show the efficiency of DeepScraper. First, we show the effect of the authenticated multiprocessing by showing that it increases the crawling speed from 2.0310.57 times as the number of running processes increases from 2 to 32 compared to DeepScraper with a single process. Then, we compare the crawling speed of DeepScraper with the existing studies. The result shows that DeepScraper is compared to even Twitter standard APIs and Twitter4J while DeepScraper can scrape much more tweets than them. Furthermore, DeepScraper is much faster than Twitter Scrapy roughly 3.69 times while both can scrape the entire tweets for the target users or keywords.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Data & Knowledge Engineering 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) stimulates the exchange of ideas and interaction between these two related fields of interest. DKE reaches a world-wide audience of researchers, designers, managers and users. The major aim of the journal is to identify, investigate and analyze the underlying principles in the design and effective use of these systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信