来自调查“评论”部分的见解:扩展对博士福祉的研究

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anna Sverdlik, Lynn Mcalpine, Nathan Hall
{"title":"来自调查“评论”部分的见解:扩展对博士福祉的研究","authors":"Anna Sverdlik, Lynn Mcalpine, Nathan Hall","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-06-2020-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study is to better understand the declines in doctoral students’ mental and physical health while pursuing their doctoral degrees, by revealing the major themes of students’ voluntary comments following a survey that primed students to reflect on these topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The present study used qualitative thematic analysis to uncover themes in doctoral students’ voluntary comments on a large-scale, web-based survey of graduate students’ motivation and well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>A thematic analysis revealed six major emerging themes: timing in the degree process, work-life balance, health/well-being changes, impostor syndrome, the supervisor and hopelessness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The themes uncovered in the present study contribute to the literature by highlighting important underexplored topics (e.g. timing in the degree process, hopelessness) in doctoral education research and they are discussed and situated in the context of existing literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Implications for doctoral supervisors and departments are discussed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The present study highlights some pressing concerns among doctoral students, as articulated by the students themselves and can contribute to the betterment of doctoral education, thereby reducing attrition, improving the experiences of doctoral students and possibly affording more candidates to achieve a doctoral degree.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The present study makes the above-mentioned contributions by taking a novel approach and analyzing doctoral students’ voluntary comments (<em>n</em> = 607) on a large-scale, web-based survey. Thus, while some of the themes were primed by the survey itself, the data represent issues/concerns that students perceived as important enough to comment about after already having completed a lengthy questionnaire.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from a survey “comments” section: extending research on doctoral well-being\",\"authors\":\"Anna Sverdlik, Lynn Mcalpine, Nathan Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sgpe-06-2020-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of this study is to better understand the declines in doctoral students’ mental and physical health while pursuing their doctoral degrees, by revealing the major themes of students’ voluntary comments following a survey that primed students to reflect on these topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The present study used qualitative thematic analysis to uncover themes in doctoral students’ voluntary comments on a large-scale, web-based survey of graduate students’ motivation and well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>A thematic analysis revealed six major emerging themes: timing in the degree process, work-life balance, health/well-being changes, impostor syndrome, the supervisor and hopelessness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The themes uncovered in the present study contribute to the literature by highlighting important underexplored topics (e.g. timing in the degree process, hopelessness) in doctoral education research and they are discussed and situated in the context of existing literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Implications for doctoral supervisors and departments are discussed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>The present study highlights some pressing concerns among doctoral students, as articulated by the students themselves and can contribute to the betterment of doctoral education, thereby reducing attrition, improving the experiences of doctoral students and possibly affording more candidates to achieve a doctoral degree.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The present study makes the above-mentioned contributions by taking a novel approach and analyzing doctoral students’ voluntary comments (<em>n</em> = 607) on a large-scale, web-based survey. Thus, while some of the themes were primed by the survey itself, the data represent issues/concerns that students perceived as important enough to comment about after already having completed a lengthy questionnaire.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":42038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-06-2020-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-06-2020-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过一项调查,揭示学生自愿评论的主要主题,从而更好地了解博士生在攻读博士学位期间心理和身体健康状况的下降。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定性主题分析来揭示博士生在一项大规模的、基于网络的关于研究生动机和幸福感的调查中自愿评论的主题。一项专题分析揭示了六个主要的新兴主题:学位过程中的时间、工作与生活的平衡、健康/幸福的变化、冒名顶替综合症、上司和绝望。本研究揭示的主题通过突出博士教育研究中重要的未被探索的主题(例如学位过程中的时间,无望)来促进文献,并在现有文献的背景下进行讨论和定位。本文还讨论了对博士生导师和院系的实际意义。社会意义本研究突出了博士生中一些紧迫的问题,正如学生自己所阐述的那样,可以有助于改善博士教育,从而减少人员流失,改善博士生的体验,并可能提供更多的候选人来获得博士学位。原创性/价值本研究采用新颖的方法,分析了博士生在大规模网络调查中的自愿评论(n = 607),从而做出了上述贡献。因此,虽然一些主题是由调查本身引发的,但数据代表了学生认为重要到足以在完成冗长的问卷调查后发表评论的问题/关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from a survey “comments” section: extending research on doctoral well-being

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to better understand the declines in doctoral students’ mental and physical health while pursuing their doctoral degrees, by revealing the major themes of students’ voluntary comments following a survey that primed students to reflect on these topics.

Design/methodology/approach

The present study used qualitative thematic analysis to uncover themes in doctoral students’ voluntary comments on a large-scale, web-based survey of graduate students’ motivation and well-being.

Findings

A thematic analysis revealed six major emerging themes: timing in the degree process, work-life balance, health/well-being changes, impostor syndrome, the supervisor and hopelessness.

Research limitations/implications

The themes uncovered in the present study contribute to the literature by highlighting important underexplored topics (e.g. timing in the degree process, hopelessness) in doctoral education research and they are discussed and situated in the context of existing literature.

Practical implications

Implications for doctoral supervisors and departments are discussed.

Social implications

The present study highlights some pressing concerns among doctoral students, as articulated by the students themselves and can contribute to the betterment of doctoral education, thereby reducing attrition, improving the experiences of doctoral students and possibly affording more candidates to achieve a doctoral degree.

Originality/value

The present study makes the above-mentioned contributions by taking a novel approach and analyzing doctoral students’ voluntary comments (n = 607) on a large-scale, web-based survey. Thus, while some of the themes were primed by the survey itself, the data represent issues/concerns that students perceived as important enough to comment about after already having completed a lengthy questionnaire.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信