随机分配:巴林斯基-杨不可能性的随机解

IF 1 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Jyy-I Hong, Joseph Najnudel, Siang-Mao Rao, Ju-Yi Yen
{"title":"随机分配:巴林斯基-杨不可能性的随机解","authors":"Jyy-I Hong, Joseph Najnudel, Siang-Mao Rao, Ju-Yi Yen","doi":"10.1007/s11009-023-10070-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An apportionment paradox occurs when the rules for apportionment in a political system or distribution system produce results which seem to violate common sense. For example, The Alabama paradox occurs when the total number of seats increases but decreases the allocated number of a state and the population paradox occurs when the population of a state increases but its allocated number of seats decreases. The Balinski-Young impossibility theorem showed that there is no deterministic apportionment method that can avoid the violation of the quota rule and doesn’t have both the Alabama and the population paradoxes. In this paper, we propose a randomized apportionment method as a stochastic solution to the Balinski-Young impossibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":18442,"journal":{"name":"Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Random Apportionment: A Stochastic Solution to the Balinski-Young Impossibility\",\"authors\":\"Jyy-I Hong, Joseph Najnudel, Siang-Mao Rao, Ju-Yi Yen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11009-023-10070-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An apportionment paradox occurs when the rules for apportionment in a political system or distribution system produce results which seem to violate common sense. For example, The Alabama paradox occurs when the total number of seats increases but decreases the allocated number of a state and the population paradox occurs when the population of a state increases but its allocated number of seats decreases. The Balinski-Young impossibility theorem showed that there is no deterministic apportionment method that can avoid the violation of the quota rule and doesn’t have both the Alabama and the population paradoxes. In this paper, we propose a randomized apportionment method as a stochastic solution to the Balinski-Young impossibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-023-10070-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-023-10070-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当政治制度或分配制度中的分配规则产生似乎违反常识的结果时,就会出现分配悖论。例如,当一个州的总席位数量增加但分配的席位数量减少时,就会出现阿拉巴马悖论;当一个州的人口增加但分配的席位数量减少时,就会出现人口悖论。巴林斯基-杨不可能性定理表明,不存在确定性分配方法既能避免违反配额规则,又不同时存在阿拉巴马悖论和总体悖论。本文提出了一种随机分配方法作为巴林斯基-杨不可能性的随机解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Random Apportionment: A Stochastic Solution to the Balinski-Young Impossibility

Random Apportionment: A Stochastic Solution to the Balinski-Young Impossibility

An apportionment paradox occurs when the rules for apportionment in a political system or distribution system produce results which seem to violate common sense. For example, The Alabama paradox occurs when the total number of seats increases but decreases the allocated number of a state and the population paradox occurs when the population of a state increases but its allocated number of seats decreases. The Balinski-Young impossibility theorem showed that there is no deterministic apportionment method that can avoid the violation of the quota rule and doesn’t have both the Alabama and the population paradoxes. In this paper, we propose a randomized apportionment method as a stochastic solution to the Balinski-Young impossibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability will publish high quality research and review articles in the areas of applied probability that emphasize methodology and computing. Of special interest are articles in important areas of applications that include detailed case studies. Applied probability is a broad research area that is of interest to many scientists in diverse disciplines including: anthropology, biology, communication theory, economics, epidemiology, finance, linguistics, meteorology, operations research, psychology, quality control, reliability theory, sociology and statistics. The following alphabetical listing of topics of interest to the journal is not intended to be exclusive but to demonstrate the editorial policy of attracting papers which represent a broad range of interests: -Algorithms- Approximations- Asymptotic Approximations & Expansions- Combinatorial & Geometric Probability- Communication Networks- Extreme Value Theory- Finance- Image Analysis- Inequalities- Information Theory- Mathematical Physics- Molecular Biology- Monte Carlo Methods- Order Statistics- Queuing Theory- Reliability Theory- Stochastic Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信