分子系统发育和比较形态学揭示鳞翅目鳞翅目的物种有效性和系统地位(双壳目:银联科)

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Ruiwen Wu, Lili Liu, Liping Zhang, Dandong Jin, Xiaoping Wu, Xiongjun Liu, Zhicai Xie, Zhengfei Li
{"title":"分子系统发育和比较形态学揭示鳞翅目鳞翅目的物种有效性和系统地位(双壳目:银联科)","authors":"Ruiwen Wu, Lili Liu, Liping Zhang, Dandong Jin, Xiaoping Wu, Xiongjun Liu, Zhicai Xie, Zhengfei Li","doi":"10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasingly sophisticated molecular techniques and research tools have greatly advanced the understanding of species diversity and phylogenetic relationships in freshwater mussels. However, malacologists have been puzzled by the taxonomic position and species validity of certain species, particularly those described solely based on conchological characteristics. The genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> is one such group. Here, we integrate shell morphology, soft-body anatomy, and molecular phylogeny to delimit the species validity of <i>Lepidodesma aligera</i> (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17–24, 1877) and <i>Lepidodesma languilati</i> (Heude in Journal De Conchyliologie 22:112–118, 1874). Comparative morphology reveals that <i>L</i>. <i>aligera</i> can be distinguished from <i>L</i>. <i>languilati</i> by its higher post-dorsal wing covered with scattered nodules, as well as differences in the incurrent aperture, excurrent aperture, and gill. Additionally, the average genetic distance based on DNA barcodes (COI) between both species is 4.0%. Integrative taxonomy supports the distinct species of <i>L. aligera</i>, rather than synonymy for <i>L. languilati</i>. Mitochondrial phylogenomic analyses confirm four monophyletic groups (Ambleminae + (Gonideinae + (Unioninae + Parreysiinae))) within the family Unionidae. <i>L. aligera</i> and <i>L. languilati</i> have a well-supported sister-group relationship and form a basal clade splitting from the rest of Unioninae. Therefore, the genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> should be classified as Lepidodesmini in Unioninae. The molecular clock with fossil calibration indicates that <i>Lepidodesma</i> originated in the Early Cretaceous (~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37–156.54 Mya) and diverged in the Middle Neogene (~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72–22.13 Mya). This study firstly provides anatomical features and molecular data for <i>L. aligera</i> and demonstrates the species validity and the systematic position of <i>Lepidodesma</i> taxa, which enrich our understanding of this rare group and facilitate its management and conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54666,"journal":{"name":"Organisms Diversity & Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)\",\"authors\":\"Ruiwen Wu, Lili Liu, Liping Zhang, Dandong Jin, Xiaoping Wu, Xiongjun Liu, Zhicai Xie, Zhengfei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Increasingly sophisticated molecular techniques and research tools have greatly advanced the understanding of species diversity and phylogenetic relationships in freshwater mussels. However, malacologists have been puzzled by the taxonomic position and species validity of certain species, particularly those described solely based on conchological characteristics. The genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> is one such group. Here, we integrate shell morphology, soft-body anatomy, and molecular phylogeny to delimit the species validity of <i>Lepidodesma aligera</i> (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17–24, 1877) and <i>Lepidodesma languilati</i> (Heude in Journal De Conchyliologie 22:112–118, 1874). Comparative morphology reveals that <i>L</i>. <i>aligera</i> can be distinguished from <i>L</i>. <i>languilati</i> by its higher post-dorsal wing covered with scattered nodules, as well as differences in the incurrent aperture, excurrent aperture, and gill. Additionally, the average genetic distance based on DNA barcodes (COI) between both species is 4.0%. Integrative taxonomy supports the distinct species of <i>L. aligera</i>, rather than synonymy for <i>L. languilati</i>. Mitochondrial phylogenomic analyses confirm four monophyletic groups (Ambleminae + (Gonideinae + (Unioninae + Parreysiinae))) within the family Unionidae. <i>L. aligera</i> and <i>L. languilati</i> have a well-supported sister-group relationship and form a basal clade splitting from the rest of Unioninae. Therefore, the genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> should be classified as Lepidodesmini in Unioninae. The molecular clock with fossil calibration indicates that <i>Lepidodesma</i> originated in the Early Cretaceous (~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37–156.54 Mya) and diverged in the Middle Neogene (~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72–22.13 Mya). This study firstly provides anatomical features and molecular data for <i>L. aligera</i> and demonstrates the species validity and the systematic position of <i>Lepidodesma</i> taxa, which enrich our understanding of this rare group and facilitate its management and conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organisms Diversity & Evolution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organisms Diversity & Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisms Diversity & Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越复杂的分子技术和研究工具极大地促进了对淡水贻贝物种多样性和系统发育关系的理解。然而,某些物种的分类地位和物种有效性,特别是那些仅根据心理学特征进行描述的物种,一直令软体动物学家感到困惑。鳞片蝇属就是这样一个类群。本研究结合贝壳形态学、软体解剖学和分子系统发育,确定了aligera (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17 - 24,1877)和Lepidodesma languilati (Heude in Journal de Conchyliologie 22:12 - 118,1874)的物种有效性。形态学比较表明,aligera与L. languilati具有较高的后背翅,翅上有分散的结节,并且在入孔、出孔和鳃上存在差异。此外,基于DNA条形码(COI)的两种平均遗传距离为4.0%。综合分类学支持L. aligera的独特种,而不是L. languilati的同义词。线粒体系统基因组学分析证实了四个单系类群(Ambleminae + Gonideinae + Unioninae + Parreysiinae))在Unionidae家族中。L. aligera和L. languilati具有良好的姐妹类群关系,并形成了从其余Unioninae分支中分离出来的基础分支。因此,鳞翅目蝇属应归为鳞翅目。经化石标定的分子钟表明,鳞翅目起源于早白垩世(~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37 ~ 156.54 Mya),分化于中新近纪(~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72 ~ 22.13 Mya)。本研究首次提供了L. aligera的解剖学特征和分子数据,证明了Lepidodesma分类群的物种有效性和系统地位,丰富了我们对这一稀有类群的认识,为其管理和保护提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Increasingly sophisticated molecular techniques and research tools have greatly advanced the understanding of species diversity and phylogenetic relationships in freshwater mussels. However, malacologists have been puzzled by the taxonomic position and species validity of certain species, particularly those described solely based on conchological characteristics. The genus Lepidodesma is one such group. Here, we integrate shell morphology, soft-body anatomy, and molecular phylogeny to delimit the species validity of Lepidodesma aligera (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17–24, 1877) and Lepidodesma languilati (Heude in Journal De Conchyliologie 22:112–118, 1874). Comparative morphology reveals that L. aligera can be distinguished from L. languilati by its higher post-dorsal wing covered with scattered nodules, as well as differences in the incurrent aperture, excurrent aperture, and gill. Additionally, the average genetic distance based on DNA barcodes (COI) between both species is 4.0%. Integrative taxonomy supports the distinct species of L. aligera, rather than synonymy for L. languilati. Mitochondrial phylogenomic analyses confirm four monophyletic groups (Ambleminae + (Gonideinae + (Unioninae + Parreysiinae))) within the family Unionidae. L. aligera and L. languilati have a well-supported sister-group relationship and form a basal clade splitting from the rest of Unioninae. Therefore, the genus Lepidodesma should be classified as Lepidodesmini in Unioninae. The molecular clock with fossil calibration indicates that Lepidodesma originated in the Early Cretaceous (~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37–156.54 Mya) and diverged in the Middle Neogene (~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72–22.13 Mya). This study firstly provides anatomical features and molecular data for L. aligera and demonstrates the species validity and the systematic position of Lepidodesma taxa, which enrich our understanding of this rare group and facilitate its management and conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organisms Diversity & Evolution
Organisms Diversity & Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Organisms Diversity & Evolution (published by the Gesellschaft fuer Biologische Systematik, GfBS) is devoted to furthering our understanding of all aspects of organismal diversity and evolution. Papers addressing evolutionary aspects of the systematics, phylogenetics, morphology and development, taxonomy and biogeography of any group of eukaryotes, recent or fossil, are welcome. Priority is given to papers with a strong evolutionary and/or phylogenetic focus. Manuscripts presenting important methods or tools or addressing key theoretical, methodological, and philosophical principles related to the study of organismal diversity are also welcome. Species descriptions are welcome as parts of a manuscript of broader interest that strive to integrate such taxonomic information with the other areas of interest mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信