具有市场摩擦的风险中性非加性概率

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Alain Chateauneuf, Bernard Cornet
{"title":"具有市场摩擦的风险中性非加性概率","authors":"Alain Chateauneuf, Bernard Cornet","doi":"10.1007/s40505-022-00216-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fundamental theory of asset pricing has been developed under the two main assumptions that markets are frictionless and have no arbitrage opportunities. In this case the market enforces that replicable assets are valued by a linear function of their payoffs, or as the discounted expectation with respect to the so-called risk-neutral probability. Important evidence of the presence of frictions in financial markets has led to study market pricing rules in such a framework. Recently, Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (J Econ Theory 157:730–762, 2015) have extended the Fundamental Theorem of Finance by showing that, with markets frictions, requiring the put–call parity to hold, together with the mild assumption of translation invariance, is equivalent to the market pricing rule being represented as a discounted Choquet expectation with respect to a risk-neutral nonadditive probability. This paper continues this study by characterizing important properties of the (unique) risk-neutral nonadditive probability <span>\\(v_f\\)</span> associated with a Choquet pricing rule <i>f</i>, when it is not assumed to be subadditive. First, we show that the observed violation of the call–put parity, a condition considered by Chateauneuf et al. (Math Financ 6:323–330, 1996) similar to the put–call parity in Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2015), is consistent with the existence of bid-ask spreads. Second, the balancedness of <span>\\(v_f\\)</span>—or equivalently the non-vacuity of its core—is characterized by an arbitrage-free condition that eliminates all the arbitrage opportunities that can be obtained by splitting payoffs in parts; moreover the (nonempty) core of <span>\\(v_f\\)</span> consists of <i>additive</i> probabilities below <span>\\(v_f\\)</span> whose associated (standard) expectations are all below the Choquet pricing rule <i>f</i>. Third, by strengthening again the previous arbitrage-free condition, we show the existence of a <i>strictly positive</i> risk-neutral probability below <span>\\(v_f\\)</span>, which allows to recover the standard formulation of the Fundamental Theorem of Finance for frictionless markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":40852,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory Bulletin","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The risk-neutral non-additive probability with market frictions\",\"authors\":\"Alain Chateauneuf, Bernard Cornet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40505-022-00216-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The fundamental theory of asset pricing has been developed under the two main assumptions that markets are frictionless and have no arbitrage opportunities. In this case the market enforces that replicable assets are valued by a linear function of their payoffs, or as the discounted expectation with respect to the so-called risk-neutral probability. Important evidence of the presence of frictions in financial markets has led to study market pricing rules in such a framework. Recently, Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (J Econ Theory 157:730–762, 2015) have extended the Fundamental Theorem of Finance by showing that, with markets frictions, requiring the put–call parity to hold, together with the mild assumption of translation invariance, is equivalent to the market pricing rule being represented as a discounted Choquet expectation with respect to a risk-neutral nonadditive probability. This paper continues this study by characterizing important properties of the (unique) risk-neutral nonadditive probability <span>\\\\(v_f\\\\)</span> associated with a Choquet pricing rule <i>f</i>, when it is not assumed to be subadditive. First, we show that the observed violation of the call–put parity, a condition considered by Chateauneuf et al. (Math Financ 6:323–330, 1996) similar to the put–call parity in Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2015), is consistent with the existence of bid-ask spreads. Second, the balancedness of <span>\\\\(v_f\\\\)</span>—or equivalently the non-vacuity of its core—is characterized by an arbitrage-free condition that eliminates all the arbitrage opportunities that can be obtained by splitting payoffs in parts; moreover the (nonempty) core of <span>\\\\(v_f\\\\)</span> consists of <i>additive</i> probabilities below <span>\\\\(v_f\\\\)</span> whose associated (standard) expectations are all below the Choquet pricing rule <i>f</i>. Third, by strengthening again the previous arbitrage-free condition, we show the existence of a <i>strictly positive</i> risk-neutral probability below <span>\\\\(v_f\\\\)</span>, which allows to recover the standard formulation of the Fundamental Theorem of Finance for frictionless markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Theory Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Theory Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00216-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00216-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

资产定价的基本理论是在两个主要假设下发展起来的,即市场是无摩擦的,没有套利机会。在这种情况下,市场强制要求可复制资产的价值是其收益的线性函数,或者是相对于所谓的风险中性概率的贴现期望。金融市场存在摩擦的重要证据促使人们在这样一个框架下研究市场定价规则。最近,cerrea - vioglio等人(J economics Theory 157:730-762, 2015)扩展了金融基本定理,表明在市场摩擦的情况下,要求看跌期权平价保持不变,加上对平移不变性的温和假设,相当于市场定价规则被表示为相对于风险中性的非加性概率的贴现Choquet期望。本文通过刻画与Choquet定价规则f相关的(唯一的)风险中性非加性概率\(v_f\)的重要性质来继续这一研究,当它不被假设为次加性时。首先,我们证明了观察到的看涨看跌平价的违反与买卖价差的存在是一致的,这是Chateauneuf等人(Math finance 6:32 - 330, 1996)认为的一种条件,类似于Cerreia-Vioglio等人(2015)的看跌看跌平价。其次,\(v_f\)的平衡性——或者说其核心的非真空性——以无套利条件为特征,该条件消除了通过将收益分成几部分而获得的所有套利机会;此外,\(v_f\)的(非空)核心由\(v_f\)以下的可加概率组成,其相关的(标准)预期均低于Choquet定价规则f。第三,通过再次加强之前的无套利条件,我们证明了\(v_f\)以下存在严格正的风险中性概率,这允许恢复无摩擦市场的金融基本定理的标准公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The risk-neutral non-additive probability with market frictions

The fundamental theory of asset pricing has been developed under the two main assumptions that markets are frictionless and have no arbitrage opportunities. In this case the market enforces that replicable assets are valued by a linear function of their payoffs, or as the discounted expectation with respect to the so-called risk-neutral probability. Important evidence of the presence of frictions in financial markets has led to study market pricing rules in such a framework. Recently, Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (J Econ Theory 157:730–762, 2015) have extended the Fundamental Theorem of Finance by showing that, with markets frictions, requiring the put–call parity to hold, together with the mild assumption of translation invariance, is equivalent to the market pricing rule being represented as a discounted Choquet expectation with respect to a risk-neutral nonadditive probability. This paper continues this study by characterizing important properties of the (unique) risk-neutral nonadditive probability \(v_f\) associated with a Choquet pricing rule f, when it is not assumed to be subadditive. First, we show that the observed violation of the call–put parity, a condition considered by Chateauneuf et al. (Math Financ 6:323–330, 1996) similar to the put–call parity in Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2015), is consistent with the existence of bid-ask spreads. Second, the balancedness of \(v_f\)—or equivalently the non-vacuity of its core—is characterized by an arbitrage-free condition that eliminates all the arbitrage opportunities that can be obtained by splitting payoffs in parts; moreover the (nonempty) core of \(v_f\) consists of additive probabilities below \(v_f\) whose associated (standard) expectations are all below the Choquet pricing rule f. Third, by strengthening again the previous arbitrage-free condition, we show the existence of a strictly positive risk-neutral probability below \(v_f\), which allows to recover the standard formulation of the Fundamental Theorem of Finance for frictionless markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory Bulletin is to provide an outlet for research in all areas of Economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning. The Economic Theory Bulletin together with Economic Theory are the official journals of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory. The Economic Theory Bulletin is intended to publish: 1. Short papers/notes of substantial interest. Content is subject to the same standards as Economic Theory: research in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning and on topics in mathematics that are supported by the analysis of economic problems. Published articles contribute to the understanding and solution of substantive economic problems. Theory papers with the substance and style for other journals that specialize in short papers are welcomed. Corollaries of already known results in the literature are not appropriate for publication. 2. Survey papers that clearly picture the basic ideas at work in the area, the essential technical apparatus that is used and the central questions that remain open.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信