市民对市区飞鼠保护的态度

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Artti Juutinen, Suvi Ilvonen, Emmi Haltia, Katja M. Kangas, Jani P. Pellikka, Parvez Rana, Anne Tolvanen
{"title":"市民对市区飞鼠保护的态度","authors":"Artti Juutinen, Suvi Ilvonen, Emmi Haltia, Katja M. Kangas, Jani P. Pellikka, Parvez Rana, Anne Tolvanen","doi":"10.5751/es-14190-280419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Siberian flying squirrel (<em>Pteromys volans</em>) is included among the strictly protected species of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EC) of the European Union, which is one of the key instruments for biodiversity preservation in Europe. Strict protection of the species has a potential to cause conflicts in areas where forest management and urban development compete for the same space with the flying squirrel. This study examined attitudes of Finnish citizens toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas using survey data collected in three cities: Espoo, Jyväskylä, and Kuopio. Two samples (random and self-selection samples) were collected to investigate how the specific process of giving “voice” to citizens by polls in urban planning affects the results. The analysis was conducted by integrating factor and cluster analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling. Four attitude groups of citizens were identified and named: “neutral on protection” (share of respondents: 33%), “strongly in favor of protection” (32%), “somewhat against protection” (26%), and “strongly against protection” (9%). Several individual-specific factors were found to be associated with the probability of belonging to different attitude groups. For example, female respondents had a higher probability of belonging to the group that was strongly in favor of protection, and older respondents had a higher probability of belonging to groups against protection. Respondents of the self-selection sample had a higher probability of belonging to the “strongly in favor of protection” group. They therefore had a more positive attitude toward the protection of flying squirrels than the other respondents. This finding indicates that cities may gain an overly positive view of citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels through current public participation methods based on self-selection procedures, such as public hearings used in land use planning.</p>\n<p>The post Citizens&#8217; attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas first appeared on Ecology & Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51028,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Society","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas\",\"authors\":\"Artti Juutinen, Suvi Ilvonen, Emmi Haltia, Katja M. Kangas, Jani P. Pellikka, Parvez Rana, Anne Tolvanen\",\"doi\":\"10.5751/es-14190-280419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Siberian flying squirrel (<em>Pteromys volans</em>) is included among the strictly protected species of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EC) of the European Union, which is one of the key instruments for biodiversity preservation in Europe. Strict protection of the species has a potential to cause conflicts in areas where forest management and urban development compete for the same space with the flying squirrel. This study examined attitudes of Finnish citizens toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas using survey data collected in three cities: Espoo, Jyväskylä, and Kuopio. Two samples (random and self-selection samples) were collected to investigate how the specific process of giving “voice” to citizens by polls in urban planning affects the results. The analysis was conducted by integrating factor and cluster analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling. Four attitude groups of citizens were identified and named: “neutral on protection” (share of respondents: 33%), “strongly in favor of protection” (32%), “somewhat against protection” (26%), and “strongly against protection” (9%). Several individual-specific factors were found to be associated with the probability of belonging to different attitude groups. For example, female respondents had a higher probability of belonging to the group that was strongly in favor of protection, and older respondents had a higher probability of belonging to groups against protection. Respondents of the self-selection sample had a higher probability of belonging to the “strongly in favor of protection” group. They therefore had a more positive attitude toward the protection of flying squirrels than the other respondents. This finding indicates that cities may gain an overly positive view of citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels through current public participation methods based on self-selection procedures, such as public hearings used in land use planning.</p>\\n<p>The post Citizens&#8217; attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas first appeared on Ecology & Society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Society\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5751/es-14190-280419\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/es-14190-280419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西伯利亚鼯鼠(Pteromys volans)是欧盟栖息地指令(92/43/EC)严格保护的物种之一,是欧洲生物多样性保护的重要手段之一。在森林管理和城市发展与鼯鼠争夺同一空间的地区,对该物种的严格保护可能会引起冲突。本研究利用在埃斯波、Jyväskylä和库奥皮奥三个城市收集的调查数据,调查了芬兰公民对城市地区保护鼯鼠的态度。选取随机和自选两种样本,探讨城市规划中通过民意调查赋予公民“发言权”的具体过程对结果的影响。采用综合因子聚类分析和多项logistic回归模型进行分析。调查确定并列出了四个态度群体:“对保护持中立态度”(33%)、“强烈支持保护”(32%)、“有些反对保护”(26%)、“强烈反对保护”(9%)。研究发现,一些个人特定因素与属于不同态度群体的可能性有关。例如,女性受访者更有可能属于强烈支持保护的群体,而年长的受访者更有可能属于反对保护的群体。自我选择样本的受访者更有可能属于“强烈支持保护”群体。因此,他们对保护鼯鼠的态度比其他受访者更为积极。这一发现表明,城市可能会通过现有的基于自我选择程序的公众参与方式,如在土地利用规划中使用的公众听证会,对市民对保护鼯鼠的态度产生过于积极的看法。post Citizens’关于保护城市飞鼠的态度最早出现在《生态与社会》杂志上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas

The Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) is included among the strictly protected species of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EC) of the European Union, which is one of the key instruments for biodiversity preservation in Europe. Strict protection of the species has a potential to cause conflicts in areas where forest management and urban development compete for the same space with the flying squirrel. This study examined attitudes of Finnish citizens toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas using survey data collected in three cities: Espoo, Jyväskylä, and Kuopio. Two samples (random and self-selection samples) were collected to investigate how the specific process of giving “voice” to citizens by polls in urban planning affects the results. The analysis was conducted by integrating factor and cluster analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling. Four attitude groups of citizens were identified and named: “neutral on protection” (share of respondents: 33%), “strongly in favor of protection” (32%), “somewhat against protection” (26%), and “strongly against protection” (9%). Several individual-specific factors were found to be associated with the probability of belonging to different attitude groups. For example, female respondents had a higher probability of belonging to the group that was strongly in favor of protection, and older respondents had a higher probability of belonging to groups against protection. Respondents of the self-selection sample had a higher probability of belonging to the “strongly in favor of protection” group. They therefore had a more positive attitude toward the protection of flying squirrels than the other respondents. This finding indicates that cities may gain an overly positive view of citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels through current public participation methods based on self-selection procedures, such as public hearings used in land use planning.

The post Citizens’ attitudes toward the protection of flying squirrels in urban areas first appeared on Ecology & Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology and Society
Ecology and Society 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology and Society is an electronic, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of current research. Manuscript submission, peer review, and publication are all handled on the Internet. Software developed for the journal automates all clerical steps during peer review, facilitates a double-blind peer review process, and allows authors and editors to follow the progress of peer review on the Internet. As articles are accepted, they are published in an "Issue in Progress." At four month intervals the Issue-in-Progress is declared a New Issue, and subscribers receive the Table of Contents of the issue via email. Our turn-around time (submission to publication) averages around 350 days. We encourage publication of special features. Special features are comprised of a set of manuscripts that address a single theme, and include an introductory and summary manuscript. The individual contributions are published in regular issues, and the special feature manuscripts are linked through a table of contents and announced on the journal''s main page. The journal seeks papers that are novel, integrative and written in a way that is accessible to a wide audience that includes an array of disciplines from the natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities concerned with the relationship between society and the life-supporting ecosystems on which human wellbeing ultimately depends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信