设计替代表单自动完成工具以增强隐私决策和防止意外泄露

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Bart P. Knijnenburg, Burcu Bulgurcu
{"title":"设计替代表单自动完成工具以增强隐私决策和防止意外泄露","authors":"Bart P. Knijnenburg, Burcu Bulgurcu","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern Web browsers provide users with tools to reduce the burden of filling out forms. Despite the widespread adoption of these tools, little is known about how they affect users’ privacy decision-making. This research compares traditional form autocompletion tools with two alternative tools designed for elaboration for this study (“add” and “remove” tools). The results show that the use of traditional form autocompletion tools significantly diminishes users’ deliberate privacy decision-making, while the proposed tools can mitigate these adverse effects, such that users (1) disclose significantly less information and (2) are more likely to assess the alignment between the type of the data requested and the goal of the entity requesting that data (i.e., <i>context specificity</i>). While both proposed tools help users become more deliberate in their disclosure behavior, they prefer the “add” tool over the “remove” tool. Our results show that tools designed for elaboration can nudge users towards protecting their privacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50917,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Alternative Form-Autocompletion Tools to Enhance Privacy Decision Making and Prevent Unintended Disclosure\",\"authors\":\"Bart P. Knijnenburg, Burcu Bulgurcu\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Modern Web browsers provide users with tools to reduce the burden of filling out forms. Despite the widespread adoption of these tools, little is known about how they affect users’ privacy decision-making. This research compares traditional form autocompletion tools with two alternative tools designed for elaboration for this study (“add” and “remove” tools). The results show that the use of traditional form autocompletion tools significantly diminishes users’ deliberate privacy decision-making, while the proposed tools can mitigate these adverse effects, such that users (1) disclose significantly less information and (2) are more likely to assess the alignment between the type of the data requested and the goal of the entity requesting that data (i.e., <i>context specificity</i>). While both proposed tools help users become more deliberate in their disclosure behavior, they prefer the “add” tool over the “remove” tool. Our results show that tools designed for elaboration can nudge users towards protecting their privacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610366\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代Web浏览器为用户提供了减轻填写表单负担的工具。尽管这些工具被广泛采用,但人们对它们如何影响用户的隐私决策知之甚少。本研究比较了传统的表单自动完成工具和为本研究设计的两种替代工具(“添加”和“删除”工具)。结果表明,使用传统的表单自动完成工具显著减少了用户故意的隐私决策,而提出的工具可以减轻这些不利影响,例如用户(1)披露的信息显着减少,(2)更有可能评估请求数据类型与请求数据实体的目标之间的一致性(即上下文特异性)。虽然这两种建议的工具都有助于用户在披露信息时变得更加谨慎,但他们更喜欢“添加”工具,而不是“删除”工具。我们的研究结果表明,为细化而设计的工具可以推动用户保护他们的隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Alternative Form-Autocompletion Tools to Enhance Privacy Decision Making and Prevent Unintended Disclosure

Modern Web browsers provide users with tools to reduce the burden of filling out forms. Despite the widespread adoption of these tools, little is known about how they affect users’ privacy decision-making. This research compares traditional form autocompletion tools with two alternative tools designed for elaboration for this study (“add” and “remove” tools). The results show that the use of traditional form autocompletion tools significantly diminishes users’ deliberate privacy decision-making, while the proposed tools can mitigate these adverse effects, such that users (1) disclose significantly less information and (2) are more likely to assess the alignment between the type of the data requested and the goal of the entity requesting that data (i.e., context specificity). While both proposed tools help users become more deliberate in their disclosure behavior, they prefer the “add” tool over the “remove” tool. Our results show that tools designed for elaboration can nudge users towards protecting their privacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This ACM Transaction seeks to be the premier archival journal in the multidisciplinary field of human-computer interaction. Since its first issue in March 1994, it has presented work of the highest scientific quality that contributes to the practice in the present and future. The primary emphasis is on results of broad application, but the journal considers original work focused on specific domains, on special requirements, on ethical issues -- the full range of design, development, and use of interactive systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信