术后镇痛。

P O Bridenbaugh
{"title":"术后镇痛。","authors":"P O Bridenbaugh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years hospitals have begun to institute special postoperative pain services staffed by anesthesia department personnel. The charter for such services is to provide the best and most appropriate postoperative analgesia for surgical patients, in particular for the increasing numbers of patients who, released from hospital soon after surgery, still require pain relief on an outpatient basis. This review focuses on the relative benefits and risks of the currently available options for postoperative pain relief: intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration of narcotics; epidural or subarachnoid administration of narcotics and/or local anesthetics; and peripheral nerve blocks with local anesthetics. In terms of efficacy, cost, risk, and personnel requirements, the particular advantages of continuous analgesia techniques--including patient-controlled analgesia--are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7309,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"550 ","pages":"177-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative analgesia.\",\"authors\":\"P O Bridenbaugh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years hospitals have begun to institute special postoperative pain services staffed by anesthesia department personnel. The charter for such services is to provide the best and most appropriate postoperative analgesia for surgical patients, in particular for the increasing numbers of patients who, released from hospital soon after surgery, still require pain relief on an outpatient basis. This review focuses on the relative benefits and risks of the currently available options for postoperative pain relief: intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration of narcotics; epidural or subarachnoid administration of narcotics and/or local anesthetics; and peripheral nerve blocks with local anesthetics. In terms of efficacy, cost, risk, and personnel requirements, the particular advantages of continuous analgesia techniques--including patient-controlled analgesia--are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"550 \",\"pages\":\"177-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,医院已经开始建立专门的术后疼痛服务,由麻醉科人员配备。此类服务的宗旨是为手术患者提供最佳和最适当的术后镇痛,特别是为越来越多的术后不久出院但仍需要门诊止痛的患者提供最佳和最适当的术后镇痛。本综述的重点是目前可用的术后疼痛缓解方案的相对获益和风险:肌肉注射(i.m)和静脉注射(i.v)麻醉;麻醉药品和/或局麻药的硬膜外或蛛网膜下给药;用局部麻醉剂阻断周围神经。在疗效、成本、风险和人员要求方面,讨论了持续镇痛技术(包括患者控制的镇痛)的特殊优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative analgesia.

In recent years hospitals have begun to institute special postoperative pain services staffed by anesthesia department personnel. The charter for such services is to provide the best and most appropriate postoperative analgesia for surgical patients, in particular for the increasing numbers of patients who, released from hospital soon after surgery, still require pain relief on an outpatient basis. This review focuses on the relative benefits and risks of the currently available options for postoperative pain relief: intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration of narcotics; epidural or subarachnoid administration of narcotics and/or local anesthetics; and peripheral nerve blocks with local anesthetics. In terms of efficacy, cost, risk, and personnel requirements, the particular advantages of continuous analgesia techniques--including patient-controlled analgesia--are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信