奇点的数据科学

David Donoho
{"title":"奇点的数据科学","authors":"David Donoho","doi":"arxiv-2310.00865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A purported `AI Singularity' has been in the public eye recently. Mass media\nand US national political attention focused on `AI Doom' narratives hawked by\nsocial media influencers. The European Commission is announcing initiatives to\nforestall `AI Extinction'. In my opinion, `AI Singularity' is the wrong\nnarrative for what's happening now; recent happenings signal something else\nentirely. Something fundamental to computation-based research really changed in\nthe last ten years. In certain fields, progress is dramatically more rapid than\npreviously, as the fields undergo a transition to frictionless reproducibility\n(FR). This transition markedly changes the rate of spread of ideas and\npractices, affects mindsets, and erases memories of much that came before. The emergence of frictionless reproducibility follows from the maturation of\n3 data science principles in the last decade. Those principles involve data\nsharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges, however implemented in the\nparticularly strong form of frictionless open services. Empirical Machine\nLearning (EML) is todays leading adherent field, and its consequent rapid\nchanges are responsible for the AI progress we see. Still, other fields can and\ndo benefit when they adhere to the same principles. Many rapid changes from this maturation are misidentified. The advent of FR\nin EML generates a steady flow of innovations; this flow stimulates outsider\nintuitions that there's an emergent superpower somewhere in AI. This opens the\nway for PR to push worrying narratives: not only `AI Extinction', but also the\nsupposed monopoly of big tech on AI research. The helpful narrative observes\nthat the superpower of EML is adherence to frictionless reproducibility\npractices; these practices are responsible for the striking progress in AI that\nwe see everywhere.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data Science at the Singularity\",\"authors\":\"David Donoho\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2310.00865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A purported `AI Singularity' has been in the public eye recently. Mass media\\nand US national political attention focused on `AI Doom' narratives hawked by\\nsocial media influencers. The European Commission is announcing initiatives to\\nforestall `AI Extinction'. In my opinion, `AI Singularity' is the wrong\\nnarrative for what's happening now; recent happenings signal something else\\nentirely. Something fundamental to computation-based research really changed in\\nthe last ten years. In certain fields, progress is dramatically more rapid than\\npreviously, as the fields undergo a transition to frictionless reproducibility\\n(FR). This transition markedly changes the rate of spread of ideas and\\npractices, affects mindsets, and erases memories of much that came before. The emergence of frictionless reproducibility follows from the maturation of\\n3 data science principles in the last decade. Those principles involve data\\nsharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges, however implemented in the\\nparticularly strong form of frictionless open services. Empirical Machine\\nLearning (EML) is todays leading adherent field, and its consequent rapid\\nchanges are responsible for the AI progress we see. Still, other fields can and\\ndo benefit when they adhere to the same principles. Many rapid changes from this maturation are misidentified. The advent of FR\\nin EML generates a steady flow of innovations; this flow stimulates outsider\\nintuitions that there's an emergent superpower somewhere in AI. This opens the\\nway for PR to push worrying narratives: not only `AI Extinction', but also the\\nsupposed monopoly of big tech on AI research. The helpful narrative observes\\nthat the superpower of EML is adherence to frictionless reproducibility\\npractices; these practices are responsible for the striking progress in AI that\\nwe see everywhere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.00865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.00865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,一个所谓的“人工智能奇点”进入了公众视野。大众媒体和美国国家政治的注意力都集中在社交媒体上有影响力的人所兜售的“人工智能末日”叙事上。欧盟委员会宣布了防止“人工智能灭绝”的举措。在我看来,“人工智能奇点”是对现在发生的事情的错误描述;最近发生的事情表明了完全不同的情况。在过去的十年里,基于计算的研究的一些基本的东西确实发生了变化。在某些领域,随着领域向无摩擦可重复性(FR)过渡,进展比以前要快得多。这种转变显著地改变了思想和实践的传播速度,影响了思维方式,并抹去了以前的许多记忆。无摩擦可重复性的出现是在过去十年中数据科学原理成熟之后出现的。这些原则涉及数据共享、代码共享和竞争挑战,但在无摩擦开放服务的特别强大的形式中实现。经验机器学习(EML)是当今领先的附属领域,其随之而来的快速变化是我们所看到的人工智能进步的原因。尽管如此,当他们坚持同样的原则时,其他领域也可以并且确实受益。这种成熟带来的许多快速变化被错误地识别了。FRin EML的出现产生了稳定的创新流;这种流动刺激了外界的直觉,即人工智能中存在一种新兴的超能力。这为公关部门推动令人担忧的叙事开辟了道路:不仅是“人工智能灭绝”,还有大型科技公司对人工智能研究的垄断。有用的叙述是,EML的超级力量在于坚持无摩擦的可重复性实践;这些实践是我们随处可见的人工智能取得惊人进步的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data Science at the Singularity
A purported `AI Singularity' has been in the public eye recently. Mass media and US national political attention focused on `AI Doom' narratives hawked by social media influencers. The European Commission is announcing initiatives to forestall `AI Extinction'. In my opinion, `AI Singularity' is the wrong narrative for what's happening now; recent happenings signal something else entirely. Something fundamental to computation-based research really changed in the last ten years. In certain fields, progress is dramatically more rapid than previously, as the fields undergo a transition to frictionless reproducibility (FR). This transition markedly changes the rate of spread of ideas and practices, affects mindsets, and erases memories of much that came before. The emergence of frictionless reproducibility follows from the maturation of 3 data science principles in the last decade. Those principles involve data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges, however implemented in the particularly strong form of frictionless open services. Empirical Machine Learning (EML) is todays leading adherent field, and its consequent rapid changes are responsible for the AI progress we see. Still, other fields can and do benefit when they adhere to the same principles. Many rapid changes from this maturation are misidentified. The advent of FR in EML generates a steady flow of innovations; this flow stimulates outsider intuitions that there's an emergent superpower somewhere in AI. This opens the way for PR to push worrying narratives: not only `AI Extinction', but also the supposed monopoly of big tech on AI research. The helpful narrative observes that the superpower of EML is adherence to frictionless reproducibility practices; these practices are responsible for the striking progress in AI that we see everywhere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信