{"title":"组序两阶段偏好设计","authors":"Ruyi Liu, Fan Li, Denise Esserman, Mary M. Ryan","doi":"arxiv-2310.11603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment\nefficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment.\nIt can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a\nselection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond\ndifferently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the\ndifference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's\npreference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to\nadopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size\nrequired to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To\naddress this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design\n(GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping.\nIn the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to\nconduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment\nto assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type\nI error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study\nwhen there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference\neffects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in\nexpectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent\nincrements assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and\napply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential\ndensity functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating\ncharacteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We\ndemonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C\ntreatment modality.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group sequential two-stage preference designs\",\"authors\":\"Ruyi Liu, Fan Li, Denise Esserman, Mary M. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2310.11603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment\\nefficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment.\\nIt can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a\\nselection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond\\ndifferently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the\\ndifference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's\\npreference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to\\nadopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size\\nrequired to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To\\naddress this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design\\n(GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping.\\nIn the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to\\nconduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment\\nto assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type\\nI error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study\\nwhen there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference\\neffects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in\\nexpectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent\\nincrements assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and\\napply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential\\ndensity functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating\\ncharacteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We\\ndemonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C\\ntreatment modality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.11603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.11603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment
efficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment.
It can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a
selection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond
differently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the
difference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's
preference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to
adopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size
required to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To
address this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design
(GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping.
In the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to
conduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment
to assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type
I error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study
when there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference
effects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in
expectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent
increments assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and
apply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential
density functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating
characteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We
demonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C
treatment modality.