组序两阶段偏好设计

Ruyi Liu, Fan Li, Denise Esserman, Mary M. Ryan
{"title":"组序两阶段偏好设计","authors":"Ruyi Liu, Fan Li, Denise Esserman, Mary M. Ryan","doi":"arxiv-2310.11603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment\nefficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment.\nIt can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a\nselection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond\ndifferently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the\ndifference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's\npreference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to\nadopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size\nrequired to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To\naddress this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design\n(GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping.\nIn the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to\nconduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment\nto assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type\nI error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study\nwhen there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference\neffects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in\nexpectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent\nincrements assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and\napply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential\ndensity functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating\ncharacteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We\ndemonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C\ntreatment modality.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group sequential two-stage preference designs\",\"authors\":\"Ruyi Liu, Fan Li, Denise Esserman, Mary M. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2310.11603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment\\nefficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment.\\nIt can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a\\nselection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond\\ndifferently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the\\ndifference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's\\npreference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to\\nadopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size\\nrequired to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To\\naddress this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design\\n(GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping.\\nIn the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to\\nconduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment\\nto assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type\\nI error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study\\nwhen there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference\\neffects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in\\nexpectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent\\nincrements assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and\\napply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential\\ndensity functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating\\ncharacteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We\\ndemonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C\\ntreatment modality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.11603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.11603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两阶段偏好设计(TSPD)能够推断治疗效果,同时允许纳入患者对治疗的偏好。它可以为选择和偏好效应提供无偏估计,其中选择效应发生在偏好一种治疗的患者与偏好另一种治疗的患者的反应不同时,偏好效应是由患者的偏好与他们接受的实际治疗之间的相互作用引起的反应差异。然而,在实践中采用TSPD的一个潜在障碍是,需要相对较大的样本量来估计具有足够功率的选择和偏好效应。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种组顺序两阶段偏好设计(GS-TSPD),它将TSPD与早期停止的顺序监测相结合。在GS-TSPD中,预先计划的顺序监测允许研究者在完全入组之前对积累的数据进行重复的假设检验,以评估早期试验终止的研究资格,而不会增加类型错误率。因此,当在中期分析中有足够的证据证明治疗、选择或偏好效应时,该程序允许研究者终止研究,从而减少设计资源的预期。为了形式化这一过程,我们验证了用于测试选择和偏好效应的独立增量假设,并从近似序列密度函数中应用了群序列停止边界。然后进行了仿真,以研究我们提出的GS-TSPD与传统TSPD的工作特性。我们通过对丙型肝炎治疗方式的研究来证明该设计的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group sequential two-stage preference designs
The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables the inference for treatment efficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment. It can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a selection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond differently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the difference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's preference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to adopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size required to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To address this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design (GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping. In the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to conduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment to assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type I error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study when there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference effects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in expectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent increments assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and apply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential density functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating characteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We demonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C treatment modality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信