{"title":"过程跟踪和其他N=1研究的p值","authors":"Matias Lopez, Jake Bowers","doi":"arxiv-2310.13826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper introduces a \\(p\\)-value that summarizes the evidence against a\nrival causal theory that explains an observed outcome in a single case. We show\nhow to represent the probability distribution characterizing a theorized rival\nhypothesis (the null) in the absence of randomization of treatment and when\ncounting on qualitative data, for instance when conducting process tracing. As\nin Fisher's \\autocite*{fisher1935design} original design, our \\(p\\)-value\nindicates how frequently one would find the same observations or even more\nfavorable observations under a theory that is compatible with our observations\nbut antagonistic to the working hypothesis. We also present an extension that\nallows researchers assess the sensitivity of their results to confirmation\nbias. Finally, we illustrate the application of our hypothesis test using the\nstudy by Snow \\autocite*{Snow1855} about the cause of Cholera in Soho, a\nclassic in Process Tracing, Epidemiology, and Microbiology. Our framework suits\nany type of case studies and evidence, such as data from interviews, archives,\nor participant observation.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A p-value for Process Tracing and other N=1 Studies\",\"authors\":\"Matias Lopez, Jake Bowers\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2310.13826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper introduces a \\\\(p\\\\)-value that summarizes the evidence against a\\nrival causal theory that explains an observed outcome in a single case. We show\\nhow to represent the probability distribution characterizing a theorized rival\\nhypothesis (the null) in the absence of randomization of treatment and when\\ncounting on qualitative data, for instance when conducting process tracing. As\\nin Fisher's \\\\autocite*{fisher1935design} original design, our \\\\(p\\\\)-value\\nindicates how frequently one would find the same observations or even more\\nfavorable observations under a theory that is compatible with our observations\\nbut antagonistic to the working hypothesis. We also present an extension that\\nallows researchers assess the sensitivity of their results to confirmation\\nbias. Finally, we illustrate the application of our hypothesis test using the\\nstudy by Snow \\\\autocite*{Snow1855} about the cause of Cholera in Soho, a\\nclassic in Process Tracing, Epidemiology, and Microbiology. Our framework suits\\nany type of case studies and evidence, such as data from interviews, archives,\\nor participant observation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.13826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.13826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A p-value for Process Tracing and other N=1 Studies
The paper introduces a \(p\)-value that summarizes the evidence against a
rival causal theory that explains an observed outcome in a single case. We show
how to represent the probability distribution characterizing a theorized rival
hypothesis (the null) in the absence of randomization of treatment and when
counting on qualitative data, for instance when conducting process tracing. As
in Fisher's \autocite*{fisher1935design} original design, our \(p\)-value
indicates how frequently one would find the same observations or even more
favorable observations under a theory that is compatible with our observations
but antagonistic to the working hypothesis. We also present an extension that
allows researchers assess the sensitivity of their results to confirmation
bias. Finally, we illustrate the application of our hypothesis test using the
study by Snow \autocite*{Snow1855} about the cause of Cholera in Soho, a
classic in Process Tracing, Epidemiology, and Microbiology. Our framework suits
any type of case studies and evidence, such as data from interviews, archives,
or participant observation.