探讨访谈者认知能力在面对面访谈和虚拟访谈中对印象管理的作用

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Benjamin Moon, Stephanie J. Law, Joshua S. Bourdage, Nicolas Roulin, Klaus G. Melchers
{"title":"探讨访谈者认知能力在面对面访谈和虚拟访谈中对印象管理的作用","authors":"Benjamin Moon,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Law,&nbsp;Joshua S. Bourdage,&nbsp;Nicolas Roulin,&nbsp;Klaus G. Melchers","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interviewees' use of impression management (IM) in job interviews is clearly related to individual differences such as personality. However, research has paid less attention to how interviewee cognitive capacities (i.e., cognitive ability and executive functions) influence IM use, even though interviewees’ cognitive capacities and IM are theoretically linked. The current research aimed to address this research gap through two studies. In Study 1, 166 undergraduate business students participated in mock face-to-face interviews with real recruiters. In Study 2, 294 job-seeking participants recruited through Prolific completed a mock asynchronous video interview. Overall, cognitive ability was negatively related to deceptive IM while perceived incongruency (i.e., a gap between desired and perceived current impressions conveyed to others) was positively related to deceptive IM in both studies. Furthermore, cognitive ability and working memory updating, but not inhibition and shifting nor incongruency, were negatively related to honest IM in Study 2. Additionally, in both studies the relations between personality traits and interview IM were generally in line with findings from prior research. Overall, our findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of how interview IM relates to interviewee individual differences and interview performance in different forms of job interviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"32 2","pages":"261-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the role of interviewee cognitive capacities on impression management in face-to-face and virtual interviews\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Moon,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Law,&nbsp;Joshua S. Bourdage,&nbsp;Nicolas Roulin,&nbsp;Klaus G. Melchers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijsa.12460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interviewees' use of impression management (IM) in job interviews is clearly related to individual differences such as personality. However, research has paid less attention to how interviewee cognitive capacities (i.e., cognitive ability and executive functions) influence IM use, even though interviewees’ cognitive capacities and IM are theoretically linked. The current research aimed to address this research gap through two studies. In Study 1, 166 undergraduate business students participated in mock face-to-face interviews with real recruiters. In Study 2, 294 job-seeking participants recruited through Prolific completed a mock asynchronous video interview. Overall, cognitive ability was negatively related to deceptive IM while perceived incongruency (i.e., a gap between desired and perceived current impressions conveyed to others) was positively related to deceptive IM in both studies. Furthermore, cognitive ability and working memory updating, but not inhibition and shifting nor incongruency, were negatively related to honest IM in Study 2. Additionally, in both studies the relations between personality traits and interview IM were generally in line with findings from prior research. Overall, our findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of how interview IM relates to interviewee individual differences and interview performance in different forms of job interviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"261-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面试者在工作面试中使用印象管理(IM)显然与个性等个体差异有关。然而,研究较少关注受访者的认知能力(即认知能力和执行功能)如何影响即时通讯的使用,尽管受访者的认知能力和即时通讯在理论上是有联系的。本研究旨在通过两项研究来弥补这一研究缺口。在研究1中,166名本科商科学生参加了与真实招聘人员的模拟面对面面试。在研究2中,294名通过多产招聘的求职者完成了模拟的非同步视频面试。总体而言,在两项研究中,认知能力与欺骗性即时消息负相关,而感知不一致(即向他人传达的期望印象和感知当前印象之间的差距)与欺骗性即时消息正相关。此外,研究2中认知能力和工作记忆更新与诚实IM负相关,而抑制、转移和不一致不与诚实IM负相关。此外,在这两项研究中,人格特质与面试IM之间的关系与先前的研究结果基本一致。总的来说,我们的研究结果提供了一个更全面的理解面试IM如何与不同形式的面试中被面试者的个体差异和面试表现相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the role of interviewee cognitive capacities on impression management in face-to-face and virtual interviews

Interviewees' use of impression management (IM) in job interviews is clearly related to individual differences such as personality. However, research has paid less attention to how interviewee cognitive capacities (i.e., cognitive ability and executive functions) influence IM use, even though interviewees’ cognitive capacities and IM are theoretically linked. The current research aimed to address this research gap through two studies. In Study 1, 166 undergraduate business students participated in mock face-to-face interviews with real recruiters. In Study 2, 294 job-seeking participants recruited through Prolific completed a mock asynchronous video interview. Overall, cognitive ability was negatively related to deceptive IM while perceived incongruency (i.e., a gap between desired and perceived current impressions conveyed to others) was positively related to deceptive IM in both studies. Furthermore, cognitive ability and working memory updating, but not inhibition and shifting nor incongruency, were negatively related to honest IM in Study 2. Additionally, in both studies the relations between personality traits and interview IM were generally in line with findings from prior research. Overall, our findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of how interview IM relates to interviewee individual differences and interview performance in different forms of job interviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信