衍生品市场中大型交易商市场操纵的实证研究

IF 0.7 4区经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE

Review of Derivatives Research Pub Date : 2018-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s11147-018-9143-0

Robert Jarrow, Scott Fung, Shih-Chuan Tsai

{"title":"衍生品市场中大型交易商市场操纵的实证研究","authors":"Robert Jarrow, Scott Fung, Shih-Chuan Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s11147-018-9143-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using account-level transaction data in options and futures markets, we investigate the existence of market manipulation, which is the ability of large traders to trade strategically, impacting prices and making abnormal profits. First, large trader’s option positions have a quantity impact on the underlying asset’s price. Second, large traders generate significantly positive alphas from trading options and futures. Among the different investor types, proprietary dealers generate the largest positive alphas. Third, these abnormal returns are consistent with strategic trading and cross-market manipulation. The evidence supports market manipulation across the options and futures markets, but not within the futures market itself.","PeriodicalId":45022,"journal":{"name":"Review of Derivatives Research","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical investigation of large trader market manipulation in derivatives markets\",\"authors\":\"Robert Jarrow, Scott Fung, Shih-Chuan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11147-018-9143-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using account-level transaction data in options and futures markets, we investigate the existence of market manipulation, which is the ability of large traders to trade strategically, impacting prices and making abnormal profits. First, large trader’s option positions have a quantity impact on the underlying asset’s price. Second, large traders generate significantly positive alphas from trading options and futures. Among the different investor types, proprietary dealers generate the largest positive alphas. Third, these abnormal returns are consistent with strategic trading and cross-market manipulation. The evidence supports market manipulation across the options and futures markets, but not within the futures market itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Derivatives Research\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Derivatives Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-018-9143-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Derivatives Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-018-9143-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

利用期权和期货市场的账户级交易数据，我们研究了市场操纵的存在性，这是大型交易者策略性交易的能力，影响价格并获得异常利润。首先，大型交易者的期权头寸对标的资产价格有数量上的影响。其次，大型交易商从期权和期货交易中产生了显著的正阿尔法。在不同类型的投资者中，自营商产生的正alpha值最大。第三，这些异常收益与策略性交易和跨市场操纵是一致的。证据支持期权和期货市场的市场操纵，但不支持期货市场本身。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

An empirical investigation of large trader market manipulation in derivatives markets

Using account-level transaction data in options and futures markets, we investigate the existence of market manipulation, which is the ability of large traders to trade strategically, impacting prices and making abnormal profits. First, large trader’s option positions have a quantity impact on the underlying asset’s price. Second, large traders generate significantly positive alphas from trading options and futures. Among the different investor types, proprietary dealers generate the largest positive alphas. Third, these abnormal returns are consistent with strategic trading and cross-market manipulation. The evidence supports market manipulation across the options and futures markets, but not within the futures market itself.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Review of Derivatives Research Multiple-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The proliferation of derivative assets during the past two decades is unprecedented. With this growth in derivatives comes the need for financial institutions, institutional investors, and corporations to use sophisticated quantitative techniques to take full advantage of the spectrum of these new financial instruments. Academic research has significantly contributed to our understanding of derivative assets and markets. The growth of derivative asset markets has been accompanied by a commensurate growth in the volume of scientific research. The Review of Derivatives Research provides an international forum for researchers involved in the general areas of derivative assets. The Review publishes high-quality articles dealing with the pricing and hedging of derivative assets on any underlying asset (commodity, interest rate, currency, equity, real estate, traded or non-traded, etc.). Specific topics include but are not limited to: econometric analyses of derivative markets (efficiency, anomalies, performance, etc.) analysis of swap markets market microstructure and volatility issues regulatory and taxation issues credit risk new areas of applications such as corporate finance (capital budgeting, debt innovations), international trade (tariffs and quotas), banking and insurance (embedded options, asset-liability management) risk-sharing issues and the design of optimal derivative securities risk management, management and control valuation and analysis of the options embedded in capital projects valuation and hedging of exotic options new areas for further development (i.e. natural resources, environmental economics. The Review has a double-blind refereeing process. In contrast to the delays in the decision making and publication processes of many current journals, the Review will provide authors with an initial decision within nine weeks of receipt of the manuscript and a goal of publication within six months after acceptance. Finally, a section of the journal is available for rapid publication on `hot'' issues in the market, small technical pieces, and timely essays related to pending legislation and policy. Officially cited as: Rev Deriv Res