{"title":"动态环境中浓度传感的权衡","authors":"Aparajita Kashyap, Wei Wang, Brian A. Camley","doi":"arxiv-2310.00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When cells measure concentrations of chemical signals, they may average\nmultiple measurements over time in order to reduce noise in their measurements.\nHowever, when cells are in a environment that changes over time, past\nmeasurements may not reflect current conditions - creating a new source of\nerror that trades off against noise in chemical sensing. What statistics in the\ncell's environment control this tradeoff? What properties of the environment\nmake it variable enough that this tradeoff is relevant? We model a single\neukaryotic cell sensing a chemical secreted from bacteria (e.g. folic acid). In\nthis case, the environment changes because the bacteria swim - leading to\nchanges in the true concentration at the cell. We develop analytical\ncalculations and stochastic simulations of sensing in this environment. We find\nthat cells can have a huge variety of optimal sensing strategies, ranging from\nnot time averaging at all, to averaging over an arbitrarily long time, or\nhaving a finite optimal averaging time. The factors that primarily control the\nideal averaging are the ratio of sensing noise to environmental variation, and\nthe ratio of timescales of sensing to the timescale of environmental variation.\nSensing noise depends on the receptor-ligand kinetics, while the environmental\nvariation depends on the density of bacteria and the degradation and diffusion\nproperties of the secreted chemoattractant. Our results suggest that\nfluctuating environmental concentrations may be a relevant source of noise even\nin a relatively static environment.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradeoffs in concentration sensing in dynamic environments\",\"authors\":\"Aparajita Kashyap, Wei Wang, Brian A. Camley\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2310.00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When cells measure concentrations of chemical signals, they may average\\nmultiple measurements over time in order to reduce noise in their measurements.\\nHowever, when cells are in a environment that changes over time, past\\nmeasurements may not reflect current conditions - creating a new source of\\nerror that trades off against noise in chemical sensing. What statistics in the\\ncell's environment control this tradeoff? What properties of the environment\\nmake it variable enough that this tradeoff is relevant? We model a single\\neukaryotic cell sensing a chemical secreted from bacteria (e.g. folic acid). In\\nthis case, the environment changes because the bacteria swim - leading to\\nchanges in the true concentration at the cell. We develop analytical\\ncalculations and stochastic simulations of sensing in this environment. We find\\nthat cells can have a huge variety of optimal sensing strategies, ranging from\\nnot time averaging at all, to averaging over an arbitrarily long time, or\\nhaving a finite optimal averaging time. The factors that primarily control the\\nideal averaging are the ratio of sensing noise to environmental variation, and\\nthe ratio of timescales of sensing to the timescale of environmental variation.\\nSensing noise depends on the receptor-ligand kinetics, while the environmental\\nvariation depends on the density of bacteria and the degradation and diffusion\\nproperties of the secreted chemoattractant. Our results suggest that\\nfluctuating environmental concentrations may be a relevant source of noise even\\nin a relatively static environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.00062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2310.00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tradeoffs in concentration sensing in dynamic environments
When cells measure concentrations of chemical signals, they may average
multiple measurements over time in order to reduce noise in their measurements.
However, when cells are in a environment that changes over time, past
measurements may not reflect current conditions - creating a new source of
error that trades off against noise in chemical sensing. What statistics in the
cell's environment control this tradeoff? What properties of the environment
make it variable enough that this tradeoff is relevant? We model a single
eukaryotic cell sensing a chemical secreted from bacteria (e.g. folic acid). In
this case, the environment changes because the bacteria swim - leading to
changes in the true concentration at the cell. We develop analytical
calculations and stochastic simulations of sensing in this environment. We find
that cells can have a huge variety of optimal sensing strategies, ranging from
not time averaging at all, to averaging over an arbitrarily long time, or
having a finite optimal averaging time. The factors that primarily control the
ideal averaging are the ratio of sensing noise to environmental variation, and
the ratio of timescales of sensing to the timescale of environmental variation.
Sensing noise depends on the receptor-ligand kinetics, while the environmental
variation depends on the density of bacteria and the degradation and diffusion
properties of the secreted chemoattractant. Our results suggest that
fluctuating environmental concentrations may be a relevant source of noise even
in a relatively static environment.