基于强化学习的比价网站保险定价

Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang, Lukasz Szpruch, Isaac Bowers-Barnard, Henrietta Ridley, James Hickey, Chris Pearce
{"title":"基于强化学习的比价网站保险定价","authors":"Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang, Lukasz Szpruch, Isaac Bowers-Barnard, Henrietta Ridley, James Hickey, Chris Pearce","doi":"arxiv-2308.06935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of price comparison websites (PCWs) has presented insurers with\nunique challenges in formulating effective pricing strategies. Operating on\nPCWs requires insurers to strike a delicate balance between competitive\npremiums and profitability, amidst obstacles such as low historical conversion\nrates, limited visibility of competitors' actions, and a dynamic market\nenvironment. In addition to this, the capital intensive nature of the business\nmeans pricing below the risk levels of customers can result in solvency issues\nfor the insurer. To address these challenges, this paper introduces\nreinforcement learning (RL) framework that learns the optimal pricing policy by\nintegrating model-based and model-free methods. The model-based component is\nused to train agents in an offline setting, avoiding cold-start issues, while\nmodel-free algorithms are then employed in a contextual bandit (CB) manner to\ndynamically update the pricing policy to maximise the expected revenue. This\nfacilitates quick adaptation to evolving market dynamics and enhances algorithm\nefficiency and decision interpretability. The paper also highlights the\nimportance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a\nconsistent fashion and demonstrates the superiority of the proposed methodology\nover existing off-the-shelf RL/CB approaches. We validate our methodology using\nsynthetic data, generated to reflect private commercially available data within\nreal-world insurers, and compare against 6 other benchmark approaches. Our\nhybrid agent outperforms these benchmarks in terms of sample efficiency and\ncumulative reward with the exception of an agent that has access to perfect\nmarket information which would not be available in a real-world set-up.","PeriodicalId":501355,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement learning\",\"authors\":\"Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang, Lukasz Szpruch, Isaac Bowers-Barnard, Henrietta Ridley, James Hickey, Chris Pearce\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2308.06935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of price comparison websites (PCWs) has presented insurers with\\nunique challenges in formulating effective pricing strategies. Operating on\\nPCWs requires insurers to strike a delicate balance between competitive\\npremiums and profitability, amidst obstacles such as low historical conversion\\nrates, limited visibility of competitors' actions, and a dynamic market\\nenvironment. In addition to this, the capital intensive nature of the business\\nmeans pricing below the risk levels of customers can result in solvency issues\\nfor the insurer. To address these challenges, this paper introduces\\nreinforcement learning (RL) framework that learns the optimal pricing policy by\\nintegrating model-based and model-free methods. The model-based component is\\nused to train agents in an offline setting, avoiding cold-start issues, while\\nmodel-free algorithms are then employed in a contextual bandit (CB) manner to\\ndynamically update the pricing policy to maximise the expected revenue. This\\nfacilitates quick adaptation to evolving market dynamics and enhances algorithm\\nefficiency and decision interpretability. The paper also highlights the\\nimportance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a\\nconsistent fashion and demonstrates the superiority of the proposed methodology\\nover existing off-the-shelf RL/CB approaches. We validate our methodology using\\nsynthetic data, generated to reflect private commercially available data within\\nreal-world insurers, and compare against 6 other benchmark approaches. Our\\nhybrid agent outperforms these benchmarks in terms of sample efficiency and\\ncumulative reward with the exception of an agent that has access to perfect\\nmarket information which would not be available in a real-world set-up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.06935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.06935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

价格比较网站的出现给保险公司在制定有效的定价策略方面带来了独特的挑战。在历史转换率较低、对竞争对手行为的能见度有限以及动态的市场环境等障碍中,经营pcw要求保险公司在竞争性保费和盈利能力之间取得微妙的平衡。除此之外,该业务的资本密集型性质意味着定价低于客户的风险水平可能导致保险公司的偿付能力问题。为了解决这些挑战,本文引入了强化学习(RL)框架,该框架通过集成基于模型和无模型的方法来学习最优定价策略。基于模型的组件用于在离线设置中训练代理,避免冷启动问题,而无模型算法则以上下文强盗(CB)方式动态更新定价策略以最大化预期收入。这有助于快速适应不断变化的市场动态,提高算法效率和决策可解释性。本文还强调了以一致的方式使用离线数据集评估定价政策的重要性,并证明了所提出的方法优于现有的现成RL/CB方法。我们使用合成数据来验证我们的方法,生成这些数据以反映真实世界保险公司的私人商业可用数据,并与其他6种基准方法进行比较。我们的混合智能体在样本效率和累积奖励方面优于这些基准,除了一个智能体可以获得完美的市场信息,这在现实世界中是不可用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement learning
The emergence of price comparison websites (PCWs) has presented insurers with unique challenges in formulating effective pricing strategies. Operating on PCWs requires insurers to strike a delicate balance between competitive premiums and profitability, amidst obstacles such as low historical conversion rates, limited visibility of competitors' actions, and a dynamic market environment. In addition to this, the capital intensive nature of the business means pricing below the risk levels of customers can result in solvency issues for the insurer. To address these challenges, this paper introduces reinforcement learning (RL) framework that learns the optimal pricing policy by integrating model-based and model-free methods. The model-based component is used to train agents in an offline setting, avoiding cold-start issues, while model-free algorithms are then employed in a contextual bandit (CB) manner to dynamically update the pricing policy to maximise the expected revenue. This facilitates quick adaptation to evolving market dynamics and enhances algorithm efficiency and decision interpretability. The paper also highlights the importance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a consistent fashion and demonstrates the superiority of the proposed methodology over existing off-the-shelf RL/CB approaches. We validate our methodology using synthetic data, generated to reflect private commercially available data within real-world insurers, and compare against 6 other benchmark approaches. Our hybrid agent outperforms these benchmarks in terms of sample efficiency and cumulative reward with the exception of an agent that has access to perfect market information which would not be available in a real-world set-up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信