预测术后30天死亡率的四项风险评分的外部效度

Frederick Torlot, Chang-Yang Yew, Jennifer R. Reilly, Michael Phillips, Dieter G. Weber, Tomas B. Corcoran, Kwok M. Ho, Andrew J. Toner
{"title":"预测术后30天死亡率的四项风险评分的外部效度","authors":"Frederick Torlot, Chang-Yang Yew, Jennifer R. Reilly, Michael Phillips, Dieter G. Weber, Tomas B. Corcoran, Kwok M. Ho, Andrew J. Toner","doi":"10.1101/2022.03.15.22272450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> Surgical risk prediction tools can facilitate shared-decision-making and efficient allocation of perioperative resources. Such tools should be externally validated in target populations prior to implementation.","PeriodicalId":501303,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The external validity of four risk scores predicting 30-day mortality after surgery\",\"authors\":\"Frederick Torlot, Chang-Yang Yew, Jennifer R. Reilly, Michael Phillips, Dieter G. Weber, Tomas B. Corcoran, Kwok M. Ho, Andrew J. Toner\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2022.03.15.22272450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background</strong> Surgical risk prediction tools can facilitate shared-decision-making and efficient allocation of perioperative resources. Such tools should be externally validated in target populations prior to implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.22272450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.22272450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术风险预测工具可以促进围手术期资源的共享决策和有效分配。这些工具应在实施前在目标人群中进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The external validity of four risk scores predicting 30-day mortality after surgery
Background Surgical risk prediction tools can facilitate shared-decision-making and efficient allocation of perioperative resources. Such tools should be externally validated in target populations prior to implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信