人力资本和金融发展:企业层面的相互作用和宏观经济影响

Lian Allub, Pedro Gomes, Zoë Kuehn
{"title":"人力资本和金融发展:企业层面的相互作用和宏观经济影响","authors":"Lian Allub, Pedro Gomes, Zoë Kuehn","doi":"10.1093/ej/uead098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital-skill complementarity in production implies non-trivial interactions between the availability of human capital and financial constraints. Firms that are constrained in their access to finance hire a lower proportion of skilled workers than do unconstrained firms. Conversely, a lack of human capital increases skilled wages, reducing firms’ desired capital intensity and thus loosening firms’ effective financial constraints. To assess the macroeconomic implications of such firm-level interactions, we build an occupational-choice model with capital-skill complementarity in production, which we calibrate to US data. We vary financial frictions, educational attainment, and total factor productivity across countries, and we quantify how aggregate output, wage inequality, and entrepreneurship are affected by these variations. For aggregate output, the joint effect of both factors is, on average 30 % larger than the sum of the individual effects. Taking the educational attainment of the population as given, in countries with a negligible share of tertiary educated workers and low TFP, financial development has only small effects on aggregate output.","PeriodicalId":501319,"journal":{"name":"The Economic Journal","volume":"67 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Capital and Financial Development: Firm-Level Interactions and Macroeconomic Implications\",\"authors\":\"Lian Allub, Pedro Gomes, Zoë Kuehn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ej/uead098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capital-skill complementarity in production implies non-trivial interactions between the availability of human capital and financial constraints. Firms that are constrained in their access to finance hire a lower proportion of skilled workers than do unconstrained firms. Conversely, a lack of human capital increases skilled wages, reducing firms’ desired capital intensity and thus loosening firms’ effective financial constraints. To assess the macroeconomic implications of such firm-level interactions, we build an occupational-choice model with capital-skill complementarity in production, which we calibrate to US data. We vary financial frictions, educational attainment, and total factor productivity across countries, and we quantify how aggregate output, wage inequality, and entrepreneurship are affected by these variations. For aggregate output, the joint effect of both factors is, on average 30 % larger than the sum of the individual effects. Taking the educational attainment of the population as given, in countries with a negligible share of tertiary educated workers and low TFP, financial development has only small effects on aggregate output.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

生产中资本技能的互补性意味着人力资本的可用性和财政限制之间的重要相互作用。在获得融资方面受到限制的企业雇佣熟练工人的比例低于不受限制的企业。相反,人力资本的缺乏增加了熟练工人的工资,降低了企业期望的资本密集度,从而放松了企业的有效财务约束。为了评估这种企业层面的相互作用对宏观经济的影响,我们建立了一个在生产中具有资本技能互补性的职业选择模型,并根据美国的数据进行了校准。我们改变了各国的金融摩擦、受教育程度和全要素生产率,并量化了这些变化对总产出、工资不平等和创业精神的影响。对于总产出,这两个因素的联合效应平均比单个效应的总和大30%。考虑到人口的受教育程度,在受过高等教育的工人所占比例可以忽略不计、TFP较低的国家,金融发展对总产出的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Capital and Financial Development: Firm-Level Interactions and Macroeconomic Implications
Capital-skill complementarity in production implies non-trivial interactions between the availability of human capital and financial constraints. Firms that are constrained in their access to finance hire a lower proportion of skilled workers than do unconstrained firms. Conversely, a lack of human capital increases skilled wages, reducing firms’ desired capital intensity and thus loosening firms’ effective financial constraints. To assess the macroeconomic implications of such firm-level interactions, we build an occupational-choice model with capital-skill complementarity in production, which we calibrate to US data. We vary financial frictions, educational attainment, and total factor productivity across countries, and we quantify how aggregate output, wage inequality, and entrepreneurship are affected by these variations. For aggregate output, the joint effect of both factors is, on average 30 % larger than the sum of the individual effects. Taking the educational attainment of the population as given, in countries with a negligible share of tertiary educated workers and low TFP, financial development has only small effects on aggregate output.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信