完全随机实验中样本编译器平均因果效应的推断

Zhen Zhong, Per Johansson, Junni L. Zhang
{"title":"完全随机实验中样本编译器平均因果效应的推断","authors":"Zhen Zhong, Per Johansson, Junni L. Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2311.17476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In randomized experiments with non-compliance scholars have argued that the\ncomplier average causal effect (CACE) ought to be the main causal estimand. The\nliterature on inference of the complier average treatment effect (CACE) has\nfocused on inference about the population CACE. However, in general individuals\nin the experiments are volunteers. This means that there is a risk that\nindividuals partaking in a given experiment differ in important ways from a\npopulation of interest. It is thus of interest to focus on the sample at hand\nand have easy to use and correct procedures for inference about the sample\nCACE. We consider a more general setting than in the previous literature and\nconstruct a confidence interval based on the Wald estimator in the form of a\nfinite closed interval that is familiar to practitioners. Furthermore, with the\naccess of pre-treatment covariates, we propose a new regression adjustment\nestimator and associated methods for constructing confidence intervals. Finite\nsample performance of the methods is examined through a Monte Carlo simulation\nand the methods are used in an application to a job training experiment.","PeriodicalId":501330,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","volume":"82 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inference of Sample Complier Average Causal Effects in Completely Randomized Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Zhong, Per Johansson, Junni L. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.17476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In randomized experiments with non-compliance scholars have argued that the\\ncomplier average causal effect (CACE) ought to be the main causal estimand. The\\nliterature on inference of the complier average treatment effect (CACE) has\\nfocused on inference about the population CACE. However, in general individuals\\nin the experiments are volunteers. This means that there is a risk that\\nindividuals partaking in a given experiment differ in important ways from a\\npopulation of interest. It is thus of interest to focus on the sample at hand\\nand have easy to use and correct procedures for inference about the sample\\nCACE. We consider a more general setting than in the previous literature and\\nconstruct a confidence interval based on the Wald estimator in the form of a\\nfinite closed interval that is familiar to practitioners. Furthermore, with the\\naccess of pre-treatment covariates, we propose a new regression adjustment\\nestimator and associated methods for constructing confidence intervals. Finite\\nsample performance of the methods is examined through a Monte Carlo simulation\\nand the methods are used in an application to a job training experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"volume\":\"82 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.17476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.17476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不服从的随机实验中,学者们认为编译者平均因果效应(CACE)应该是主要的因果估计。关于编译器平均治疗效应(CACE)推断的文献主要集中在对总体CACE的推断上。然而,总的来说,参与实验的个体都是志愿者。这意味着,参与特定实验的个体在重要方面与感兴趣的群体存在差异,这是有风险的。因此,关注手头的样本并具有易于使用和正确的程序来推断样本是有意义的。我们考虑了一个比以往文献更一般的设置,并以从业者熟悉的有限闭区间形式基于Wald估计构造了一个置信区间。此外,利用预处理协变量,我们提出了一种新的回归调整估计量和构造置信区间的相关方法。通过蒙特卡罗仿真验证了该方法的有限样本性能,并将该方法应用于一个岗位培训实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inference of Sample Complier Average Causal Effects in Completely Randomized Experiments
In randomized experiments with non-compliance scholars have argued that the complier average causal effect (CACE) ought to be the main causal estimand. The literature on inference of the complier average treatment effect (CACE) has focused on inference about the population CACE. However, in general individuals in the experiments are volunteers. This means that there is a risk that individuals partaking in a given experiment differ in important ways from a population of interest. It is thus of interest to focus on the sample at hand and have easy to use and correct procedures for inference about the sample CACE. We consider a more general setting than in the previous literature and construct a confidence interval based on the Wald estimator in the form of a finite closed interval that is familiar to practitioners. Furthermore, with the access of pre-treatment covariates, we propose a new regression adjustment estimator and associated methods for constructing confidence intervals. Finite sample performance of the methods is examined through a Monte Carlo simulation and the methods are used in an application to a job training experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信