协变量自适应随机化的相互作用检验

Likun Zhang, Wei Ma
{"title":"协变量自适应随机化的相互作用检验","authors":"Likun Zhang, Wei Ma","doi":"arxiv-2311.17445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment-covariate interaction tests are commonly applied by researchers to\nexamine whether the treatment effect varies across patient subgroups defined by\nbaseline characteristics. The objective of this study is to explore\ntreatment-covariate interaction tests involving covariate-adaptive\nrandomization. Without assuming a parametric data generation model, we\ninvestigate usual interaction tests and observe that they tend to be\nconservative: specifically, their limiting rejection probabilities under the\nnull hypothesis do not exceed the nominal level and are typically strictly\nlower than it. To address this problem, we propose modifications to the usual\ntests to obtain corresponding exact tests. Moreover, we introduce a novel class\nof stratified-adjusted interaction tests that are simple, broadly applicable,\nand more powerful than the usual and modified tests. Our findings are relevant\nto two types of interaction tests: one involving stratification covariates and\nthe other involving additional covariates that are not used for randomization.","PeriodicalId":501330,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction tests with covariate-adaptive randomization\",\"authors\":\"Likun Zhang, Wei Ma\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.17445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Treatment-covariate interaction tests are commonly applied by researchers to\\nexamine whether the treatment effect varies across patient subgroups defined by\\nbaseline characteristics. The objective of this study is to explore\\ntreatment-covariate interaction tests involving covariate-adaptive\\nrandomization. Without assuming a parametric data generation model, we\\ninvestigate usual interaction tests and observe that they tend to be\\nconservative: specifically, their limiting rejection probabilities under the\\nnull hypothesis do not exceed the nominal level and are typically strictly\\nlower than it. To address this problem, we propose modifications to the usual\\ntests to obtain corresponding exact tests. Moreover, we introduce a novel class\\nof stratified-adjusted interaction tests that are simple, broadly applicable,\\nand more powerful than the usual and modified tests. Our findings are relevant\\nto two types of interaction tests: one involving stratification covariates and\\nthe other involving additional covariates that are not used for randomization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.17445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.17445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员通常使用治疗-协变量相互作用试验来检查治疗效果在根据基线特征定义的患者亚组之间是否存在差异。本研究的目的是探讨涉及协变量自适应随机化的治疗-协变量相互作用检验。在没有假设参数数据生成模型的情况下,我们研究了通常的相互作用测试,并观察到它们往往是保守的:具体来说,它们在完全假设下的极限拒绝概率不超过名义水平,并且通常严格低于名义水平。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了对常规测试的修改,以获得相应的精确测试。此外,我们还介绍了一种新的分层调整相互作用测试,它简单,广泛适用,并且比通常的和修改的测试更强大。我们的发现与两种类型的相互作用试验有关:一种涉及分层协变量,另一种涉及未用于随机化的附加协变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interaction tests with covariate-adaptive randomization
Treatment-covariate interaction tests are commonly applied by researchers to examine whether the treatment effect varies across patient subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. The objective of this study is to explore treatment-covariate interaction tests involving covariate-adaptive randomization. Without assuming a parametric data generation model, we investigate usual interaction tests and observe that they tend to be conservative: specifically, their limiting rejection probabilities under the null hypothesis do not exceed the nominal level and are typically strictly lower than it. To address this problem, we propose modifications to the usual tests to obtain corresponding exact tests. Moreover, we introduce a novel class of stratified-adjusted interaction tests that are simple, broadly applicable, and more powerful than the usual and modified tests. Our findings are relevant to two types of interaction tests: one involving stratification covariates and the other involving additional covariates that are not used for randomization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信