Jinyi Zhu, Janice Jhang, Hanxuan Yu, Alvin I Mushlin, Hooman Kamel, Nathaniel Alemayehu, John Giardina, Ajay Gupta, Ankur Pandya
{"title":"基于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险阈值筛查无症状颈动脉狭窄的成本-效果","authors":"Jinyi Zhu, Janice Jhang, Hanxuan Yu, Alvin I Mushlin, Hooman Kamel, Nathaniel Alemayehu, John Giardina, Ajay Gupta, Ankur Pandya","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.28.23299146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> Carotid artery stenosis (50-99% extracranial internal carotid artery narrowing) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke. However, no population-based studies have directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), and the CREST-2 trial is currently evaluating the efficacy of revascularization vs. intensive medical management for ACAS patients. Given this gap, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends against screening for ACAS in the general population. Because ACAS prevalence and ischemic stroke risk vary by clinical risk factors, we sought to quantify the cost-effectiveness of screening for ACAS by cardiovascular disease risk-based sub-groups.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Thresholds\",\"authors\":\"Jinyi Zhu, Janice Jhang, Hanxuan Yu, Alvin I Mushlin, Hooman Kamel, Nathaniel Alemayehu, John Giardina, Ajay Gupta, Ankur Pandya\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.28.23299146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background</strong> Carotid artery stenosis (50-99% extracranial internal carotid artery narrowing) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke. However, no population-based studies have directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), and the CREST-2 trial is currently evaluating the efficacy of revascularization vs. intensive medical management for ACAS patients. Given this gap, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends against screening for ACAS in the general population. Because ACAS prevalence and ischemic stroke risk vary by clinical risk factors, we sought to quantify the cost-effectiveness of screening for ACAS by cardiovascular disease risk-based sub-groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.28.23299146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.28.23299146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Thresholds
Background Carotid artery stenosis (50-99% extracranial internal carotid artery narrowing) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke. However, no population-based studies have directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), and the CREST-2 trial is currently evaluating the efficacy of revascularization vs. intensive medical management for ACAS patients. Given this gap, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends against screening for ACAS in the general population. Because ACAS prevalence and ischemic stroke risk vary by clinical risk factors, we sought to quantify the cost-effectiveness of screening for ACAS by cardiovascular disease risk-based sub-groups.