关于波兰语标称结构的混合性质的说明

IF 0.5 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Piotr Cegłowski
{"title":"关于波兰语标称结构的混合性质的说明","authors":"Piotr Cegłowski","doi":"10.1515/psicl-2022-1072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to highlight certain similarities between Polish and Bulgarian with respect to the selected NP/DP criteria compiled by Bošković (2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf &amp; Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), <jats:italic>Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories</jats:italic>, 179–242. Berlin: De Gruyter). In the course of the discussion, Negative Raising with idioms and quantifier – negation interaction, definite/indefinite contrasts in the context of sub-extraction, as well as exhaustive presupposition are taken into consideration. On the basis of the data, I put forward an analysis of the Polish facts which draws upon Tasseva-Kurktchieva and Dubinsky’s (2018. On the NP/DP frontier: Bulgarian as a transitional case. In Steven Franks, Virinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph &amp; Ilyana Krapova (eds.), <jats:italic>Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin</jats:italic>, 287–312. Bloomington, IN: Slavica) account of the DEF(initeness) feature on the D head (which they use to argue for Bulgarian as a ‘weak’ DP language). Despite certain similarities between the two languages, Polish actually seems to resemble English in terms of the specific coding of this feature. The analysis suggests that (unlike in Bulgarian) DEF on D in Polish is not intrinsically valued (+int, +val), but rather receives a specific value in the course of the syntactic derivation.","PeriodicalId":43804,"journal":{"name":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A note on the mixed properties of the nominal structure in Polish\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Cegłowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/psicl-2022-1072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to highlight certain similarities between Polish and Bulgarian with respect to the selected NP/DP criteria compiled by Bošković (2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf &amp; Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), <jats:italic>Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories</jats:italic>, 179–242. Berlin: De Gruyter). In the course of the discussion, Negative Raising with idioms and quantifier – negation interaction, definite/indefinite contrasts in the context of sub-extraction, as well as exhaustive presupposition are taken into consideration. On the basis of the data, I put forward an analysis of the Polish facts which draws upon Tasseva-Kurktchieva and Dubinsky’s (2018. On the NP/DP frontier: Bulgarian as a transitional case. In Steven Franks, Virinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph &amp; Ilyana Krapova (eds.), <jats:italic>Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin</jats:italic>, 287–312. Bloomington, IN: Slavica) account of the DEF(initeness) feature on the D head (which they use to argue for Bulgarian as a ‘weak’ DP language). Despite certain similarities between the two languages, Polish actually seems to resemble English in terms of the specific coding of this feature. The analysis suggests that (unlike in Bulgarian) DEF on D in Polish is not intrinsically valued (+int, +val), but rather receives a specific value in the course of the syntactic derivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-1072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-1072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是强调波兰语和保加利亚语在Bošković(2012)编制的选定NP/DP标准方面的某些相似之处。关于NPs和条款。在北格林多夫&托马斯·埃德·齐默尔曼(编),话语和语法:从句子类型到词汇类别,179-242。柏林:De Gruyter)。在讨论过程中,我们考虑了习语的否定提升、量词与否定的相互作用、次抽取语境中的定/不定对比以及穷尽式预设。在这些数据的基础上,我借鉴了塔塞瓦-库尔克切娃和杜宾斯基(2018)的观点,对波兰的事实进行了分析。论国民党/民主党边界:作为过渡案例的保加利亚。在史蒂文·弗兰克斯、维琳达·奇丹巴拉姆、布莱恩·约瑟夫和;伊利亚娜·克拉波娃(编),在保加利亚的形态学研究在凯瑟琳·鲁丁的荣誉,287-312。Bloomington, IN: Slavica)对D语言头部的DEF(初始性)特征的解释(他们用它来争论保加利亚语是一种“弱”的DP语言)。尽管两种语言之间存在某些相似之处,但就该功能的具体编码而言,波兰语实际上似乎与英语相似。分析表明(与保加利亚语不同)波兰语中的DEF on D不是固有值(+int, +val),而是在语法派生过程中接收特定值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A note on the mixed properties of the nominal structure in Polish
The aim of this paper is to highlight certain similarities between Polish and Bulgarian with respect to the selected NP/DP criteria compiled by Bošković (2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, 179–242. Berlin: De Gruyter). In the course of the discussion, Negative Raising with idioms and quantifier – negation interaction, definite/indefinite contrasts in the context of sub-extraction, as well as exhaustive presupposition are taken into consideration. On the basis of the data, I put forward an analysis of the Polish facts which draws upon Tasseva-Kurktchieva and Dubinsky’s (2018. On the NP/DP frontier: Bulgarian as a transitional case. In Steven Franks, Virinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph & Ilyana Krapova (eds.), Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, 287–312. Bloomington, IN: Slavica) account of the DEF(initeness) feature on the D head (which they use to argue for Bulgarian as a ‘weak’ DP language). Despite certain similarities between the two languages, Polish actually seems to resemble English in terms of the specific coding of this feature. The analysis suggests that (unlike in Bulgarian) DEF on D in Polish is not intrinsically valued (+int, +val), but rather receives a specific value in the course of the syntactic derivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信