理查德·巴克斯特服从于不服从:巴克斯特作为实践神学家的现代接受

IF 0.2 N/A RELIGION
David S. Sytsma
{"title":"理查德·巴克斯特服从于不服从:巴克斯特作为实践神学家的现代接受","authors":"David S. Sytsma","doi":"10.1163/18712428-bja10033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Through an examination of the Nonconformist reception of Richard Baxter, this essay provides a window into theological transition within early modern Protestantism. I argue that, although Baxter excelled in knowledge of scholastic theology, integrated scholastic theology into his practical writings, and produced a great scholastic system of theology—the <em>Methodus Theologiae Christianae</em> (1681)—over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, scholastic and philosophical aspects within Baxter’s corpus were ignored, downplayed, and even excised by Nonconformists who otherwise strongly sympathized with his writings. The modern focus on Baxter’s practical works and neglect of Baxter’s scholastic theology is due in large part to this later reception. The story of Baxter’s reception is, moreover, illustrative of a general shift in philosophical and theological orientation in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Nonconformity.</p>","PeriodicalId":41958,"journal":{"name":"Church History and Religious Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Richard Baxter Conformed to Nonconformity: The Modern Reception of Baxter as a Practical Theologian\",\"authors\":\"David S. Sytsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18712428-bja10033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Through an examination of the Nonconformist reception of Richard Baxter, this essay provides a window into theological transition within early modern Protestantism. I argue that, although Baxter excelled in knowledge of scholastic theology, integrated scholastic theology into his practical writings, and produced a great scholastic system of theology—the <em>Methodus Theologiae Christianae</em> (1681)—over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, scholastic and philosophical aspects within Baxter’s corpus were ignored, downplayed, and even excised by Nonconformists who otherwise strongly sympathized with his writings. The modern focus on Baxter’s practical works and neglect of Baxter’s scholastic theology is due in large part to this later reception. The story of Baxter’s reception is, moreover, illustrative of a general shift in philosophical and theological orientation in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Nonconformity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Church History and Religious Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Church History and Religious Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18712428-bja10033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church History and Religious Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18712428-bja10033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对理查德·巴克斯特(Richard Baxter)的非国教接受的考察,本文提供了一个了解早期现代新教神学转型的窗口。我认为,尽管巴克斯特在经院神学知识方面表现出色,将经院神学整合到他的实用著作中,并在18世纪和19世纪的过程中创造了一个伟大的经院神学体系——《基督教神学方法》(1681年),但巴克斯特文集中的经院和哲学方面被那些强烈同情他作品的不信教者忽视、淡化,甚至删去。现代对巴克斯特实践作品的关注和对巴克斯特学术神学的忽视,在很大程度上是由于后来的这种接受。此外,巴克斯特接受的故事说明了17世纪晚期和18世纪不服从的哲学和神学取向的总体转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Richard Baxter Conformed to Nonconformity: The Modern Reception of Baxter as a Practical Theologian

Through an examination of the Nonconformist reception of Richard Baxter, this essay provides a window into theological transition within early modern Protestantism. I argue that, although Baxter excelled in knowledge of scholastic theology, integrated scholastic theology into his practical writings, and produced a great scholastic system of theology—the Methodus Theologiae Christianae (1681)—over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, scholastic and philosophical aspects within Baxter’s corpus were ignored, downplayed, and even excised by Nonconformists who otherwise strongly sympathized with his writings. The modern focus on Baxter’s practical works and neglect of Baxter’s scholastic theology is due in large part to this later reception. The story of Baxter’s reception is, moreover, illustrative of a general shift in philosophical and theological orientation in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Nonconformity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信