开发者的认知有边界吗?比较各大洲的C代码响应

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Yanyan Zhuang, Yu Yan, Lois Anne DeLong, Martin K. Yeh
{"title":"开发者的认知有边界吗?比较各大洲的C代码响应","authors":"Yanyan Zhuang, Yu Yan, Lois Anne DeLong, Martin K. Yeh","doi":"10.1007/s11219-023-09654-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies have empirically validated the existence of small patterns in C code, named atoms of confusion (or atoms for short), that can interfere with program comprehension. The focus of this research is an attempt to see if these patterns in C would have a similar impact on a second group of participants who have similar levels of experience with C, but come from different places. We report on studies conducted with students from the USA and China. Both sets of participants were shown snippets of code and asked to predict the output. While performance measures (accuracy and speed) showed little difference in aggregate, a few individual atoms yielded surprising results. For example, we found examples where the clarified versions of code, with the atoms removed, were <i>more confusing</i> to the Chinese participants, despite the presence of atoms having much less impact on this group in general. These findings suggest that both the atoms themselves, and the processes used to remove them, may be viewed differently by individuals from different parts of the world. As such, developing insights on the “cross-border” applicability of coding practices could help create better pedagogical practices to prepare students for today’s globally-integrated approach to software development.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do developer perceptions have borders? Comparing C code responses across continents\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Zhuang, Yu Yan, Lois Anne DeLong, Martin K. Yeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11219-023-09654-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent studies have empirically validated the existence of small patterns in C code, named atoms of confusion (or atoms for short), that can interfere with program comprehension. The focus of this research is an attempt to see if these patterns in C would have a similar impact on a second group of participants who have similar levels of experience with C, but come from different places. We report on studies conducted with students from the USA and China. Both sets of participants were shown snippets of code and asked to predict the output. While performance measures (accuracy and speed) showed little difference in aggregate, a few individual atoms yielded surprising results. For example, we found examples where the clarified versions of code, with the atoms removed, were <i>more confusing</i> to the Chinese participants, despite the presence of atoms having much less impact on this group in general. These findings suggest that both the atoms themselves, and the processes used to remove them, may be viewed differently by individuals from different parts of the world. As such, developing insights on the “cross-border” applicability of coding practices could help create better pedagogical practices to prepare students for today’s globally-integrated approach to software development.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Software Quality Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Software Quality Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09654-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09654-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究已经证实了C代码中存在一些小模式,称为混淆原子(或简称原子),它们会干扰程序的理解。这项研究的重点是试图看看C语言中的这些模式是否会对第二组具有类似C语言经验水平但来自不同地方的参与者产生类似的影响。我们报道对来自美国和中国的学生进行的研究。两组参与者都看到了代码片段,并被要求预测输出。虽然性能测量(准确性和速度)总体上显示差异不大,但几个单独的原子产生了令人惊讶的结果。例如,我们发现了一些例子,尽管原子的存在对这一组的影响要小得多,但去除原子的澄清版本的代码对中国参与者来说更令人困惑。这些发现表明,来自世界不同地区的人对原子本身和去除它们的过程可能有不同的看法。因此,开发对编码实践的“跨界”适用性的见解可以帮助创建更好的教学实践,为学生准备当今全球集成的软件开发方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Do developer perceptions have borders? Comparing C code responses across continents

Do developer perceptions have borders? Comparing C code responses across continents

Recent studies have empirically validated the existence of small patterns in C code, named atoms of confusion (or atoms for short), that can interfere with program comprehension. The focus of this research is an attempt to see if these patterns in C would have a similar impact on a second group of participants who have similar levels of experience with C, but come from different places. We report on studies conducted with students from the USA and China. Both sets of participants were shown snippets of code and asked to predict the output. While performance measures (accuracy and speed) showed little difference in aggregate, a few individual atoms yielded surprising results. For example, we found examples where the clarified versions of code, with the atoms removed, were more confusing to the Chinese participants, despite the presence of atoms having much less impact on this group in general. These findings suggest that both the atoms themselves, and the processes used to remove them, may be viewed differently by individuals from different parts of the world. As such, developing insights on the “cross-border” applicability of coding practices could help create better pedagogical practices to prepare students for today’s globally-integrated approach to software development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Software Quality Journal are: (1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives. (2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it. (3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality. The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information. The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信