Qiaoling Yan, Chunyu Zhu, Jiaojun Zhu, Lining Song, G. Geoff Wang, Deliang Lu
{"title":"利用树轮宽度结合碳同位素判别估算东北温带森林林隙年龄","authors":"Qiaoling Yan, Chunyu Zhu, Jiaojun Zhu, Lining Song, G. Geoff Wang, Deliang Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13595-022-01147-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Key message</h3><p>The accuracy of gap age estimation can be improved from 5–6 to 2 years by analyzing the annual width and carbon isotope discrimination of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>Gap age has a direct link to the composition and structure of regeneration. However, the accuracy of gap age estimation is still limited.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aim</h3><p>We aim to improve the accuracy of gap age estimation by analyzing the width in combination with carbon isotope discrimination (∆<sup>13</sup>C) of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four gap-surrounding trees (nine <i>Ulmus laciniata</i>, eight <i>Fraxinus rhynchophylla</i>, and seven <i>Juglans mandshurica</i>) were selected from eight artificial gaps created in December 2004. First, the growth release (i.e., peak time of percent growth change) for sample trees was measured based on the tree-ring width to identify the rough time range of gap formation. Then, the ∆<sup>13</sup>C of rings during the time range were analyzed for determining the precise year of gap formation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The peak time of percent growth change occurred from 2005 to 2010 for <i>U. laciniata</i>, 2004 to 2008 for <i>F. rhynchophylla</i>, and 2002 to 2007 for <i>J. mandshurica</i>. Within the range of 2002 to 2010, the ∆<sup>13</sup>C of rings for all sample trees significantly reduced in 2005–2006 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), which was the estimated year of gap formation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The introduction of ∆<sup>13</sup>C analysis could effectively reduce the estimating deviations of gap age by only considering tree-ring width analyses and finally improve the accuracy of gap age estimation within 2 years, which can provide reliable information for gap management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7994,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Forest Science","volume":"10 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating gap age using tree-ring width in combination with carbon isotope discrimination in a temperate forest, Northeast China\",\"authors\":\"Qiaoling Yan, Chunyu Zhu, Jiaojun Zhu, Lining Song, G. Geoff Wang, Deliang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13595-022-01147-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Key message</h3><p>The accuracy of gap age estimation can be improved from 5–6 to 2 years by analyzing the annual width and carbon isotope discrimination of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Context</h3><p>Gap age has a direct link to the composition and structure of regeneration. However, the accuracy of gap age estimation is still limited.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aim</h3><p>We aim to improve the accuracy of gap age estimation by analyzing the width in combination with carbon isotope discrimination (∆<sup>13</sup>C) of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four gap-surrounding trees (nine <i>Ulmus laciniata</i>, eight <i>Fraxinus rhynchophylla</i>, and seven <i>Juglans mandshurica</i>) were selected from eight artificial gaps created in December 2004. First, the growth release (i.e., peak time of percent growth change) for sample trees was measured based on the tree-ring width to identify the rough time range of gap formation. Then, the ∆<sup>13</sup>C of rings during the time range were analyzed for determining the precise year of gap formation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The peak time of percent growth change occurred from 2005 to 2010 for <i>U. laciniata</i>, 2004 to 2008 for <i>F. rhynchophylla</i>, and 2002 to 2007 for <i>J. mandshurica</i>. Within the range of 2002 to 2010, the ∆<sup>13</sup>C of rings for all sample trees significantly reduced in 2005–2006 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), which was the estimated year of gap formation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The introduction of ∆<sup>13</sup>C analysis could effectively reduce the estimating deviations of gap age by only considering tree-ring width analyses and finally improve the accuracy of gap age estimation within 2 years, which can provide reliable information for gap management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Forest Science\",\"volume\":\"10 46\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01147-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01147-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating gap age using tree-ring width in combination with carbon isotope discrimination in a temperate forest, Northeast China
Key message
The accuracy of gap age estimation can be improved from 5–6 to 2 years by analyzing the annual width and carbon isotope discrimination of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.
Context
Gap age has a direct link to the composition and structure of regeneration. However, the accuracy of gap age estimation is still limited.
Aim
We aim to improve the accuracy of gap age estimation by analyzing the width in combination with carbon isotope discrimination (∆13C) of the rings of gap-surrounding trees.
Methods
Twenty-four gap-surrounding trees (nine Ulmus laciniata, eight Fraxinus rhynchophylla, and seven Juglans mandshurica) were selected from eight artificial gaps created in December 2004. First, the growth release (i.e., peak time of percent growth change) for sample trees was measured based on the tree-ring width to identify the rough time range of gap formation. Then, the ∆13C of rings during the time range were analyzed for determining the precise year of gap formation.
Results
The peak time of percent growth change occurred from 2005 to 2010 for U. laciniata, 2004 to 2008 for F. rhynchophylla, and 2002 to 2007 for J. mandshurica. Within the range of 2002 to 2010, the ∆13C of rings for all sample trees significantly reduced in 2005–2006 (p < 0.05), which was the estimated year of gap formation.
Conclusion
The introduction of ∆13C analysis could effectively reduce the estimating deviations of gap age by only considering tree-ring width analyses and finally improve the accuracy of gap age estimation within 2 years, which can provide reliable information for gap management.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Forest Science is an official publication of the French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE)
-Up-to-date coverage of current developments and trends in forest research and forestry
Topics include ecology and ecophysiology, genetics and improvement, tree physiology, wood quality, and silviculture
-Formerly known as Annales des Sciences Forestières
-Biology of trees and associated organisms (symbionts, pathogens, pests)
-Forest dynamics and ecosystem processes under environmental or management drivers (ecology, genetics)
-Risks and disturbances affecting forest ecosystems (biology, ecology, economics)
-Forestry wood chain (tree breeding, forest management and productivity, ecosystem services, silviculture and plantation management)
-Wood sciences (relationships between wood structure and tree functions, and between forest management or environment and wood properties)