为什么斯瓦尔巴北极狐的布鲁氏菌血清呈阴性?

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Ingebjørg H. Nymo, Eva Fuglei, Torill Mørk, Eva M. Breines, Karin Holmgren, Rebecca Davidson, Morten Tryland
{"title":"为什么斯瓦尔巴北极狐的布鲁氏菌血清呈阴性?","authors":"Ingebjørg H. Nymo, Eva Fuglei, Torill Mørk, Eva M. Breines, Karin Holmgren, Rebecca Davidson, Morten Tryland","doi":"10.33265/polar.v41.7867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Arctic foxes (<em>Vulpes lagopus</em>) are susceptible to smooth&nbsp;<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;(s-<em>Brucella</em>) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies in polar bears (<em>Ursus maritimus</em>). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland.</p>","PeriodicalId":49684,"journal":{"name":"Polar Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?\",\"authors\":\"Ingebjørg H. Nymo, Eva Fuglei, Torill Mørk, Eva M. Breines, Karin Holmgren, Rebecca Davidson, Morten Tryland\",\"doi\":\"10.33265/polar.v41.7867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Arctic foxes (<em>Vulpes lagopus</em>) are susceptible to smooth&nbsp;<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;(s-<em>Brucella</em>) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies in polar bears (<em>Ursus maritimus</em>). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-<em>Brucella</em>&nbsp;in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北极狐(Vulpes lagopus)容易感染布鲁氏菌(s-布鲁氏菌),并且可能通过食用受感染的海洋哺乳动物而暴露于这种细菌,正如在北极熊(Ursus maritimus)中发现的s-布鲁氏菌抗体所暗示的那样。斯瓦尔巴群岛的北极狐以前没有被调查过s-布鲁氏菌抗体,但在冰岛、阿拉斯加(美国)和俄罗斯的北极狐中发现了这种抗体。我们使用间接酶联免疫吸附试验(iELISA)对斯瓦尔巴北极狐血液中的s-布鲁氏菌抗体进行了研究。这些动物(0 ~ 13岁)或被猎人捕获(1995 ~ 2003年, n = 403)或被发现死亡(1995 ~ 2003年, n = 3)。未发现血清阳性动物。不能排除感染引起的发病率和死亡率。然而,还没有报道过病原不明的大规模疾病暴发。此外,斯瓦尔巴北极狐不太可能对感染有抵抗力,因为来自其他种群的北极狐是易感的,而且种群之间存在环极地联系。冰岛和斯瓦尔巴群岛的研究结果之间的差异令人惊讶,因为这两个种群都生活在岛屿上,除了海洋哺乳动物外,没有已知的当地布鲁氏菌接触源。然而,我们的阴性结果表明,海洋哺乳动物可能不是该物种的主要感染源。为了得出关于斯瓦尔巴群岛和冰岛北极狐中s-布鲁氏菌流行病学的结论,需要进行比较调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?

Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-Brucella antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003, n = 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003, n = 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-Brucella other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-Brucella in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Research
Polar Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1982, Polar Research has been the international, peer-reviewed journal of the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway''s central institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. Aiming to promote the exchange of scientific knowledge about the Arctic and Antarctic across disciplinary boundaries, Polar Research serves an international community of researchers and managers. As an open-access journal, Polar Research makes its contents freely available to the general public. Original primary research papers comprise the mainstay of Polar Research. Review articles, brief research notes, letters to the editor and book reviews are also included. Special issues are published from time to time. The scope of Polar Research encompasses research in all scientific disciplines relevant to the polar regions. These include, but are not limited to, the subfields of biology, ecology, geology, oceanography, glaciology and atmospheric science. Submissions from the social sciences and those focusing on polar management and policy issues are welcome. Contributions about Antarctica are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信