今日汤——档案和档案管理标准化的现有和新兴趋势

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Shadrack Katuu
{"title":"今日汤——档案和档案管理标准化的现有和新兴趋势","authors":"Shadrack Katuu","doi":"10.1108/rmj-08-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine the concept of standardization beyond its traditional use in generating and implementing standards and good practice guidelines (S&amp;GPG) by looking at existing and emerging trends.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper utilizes two primary approaches to categorizing S&amp;GPG for better comprehension: categorization based on provenance as well as based on subject matter.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>A significant concern related to categorizing S&amp;GPG based on provenance or subject is the constant proliferation of standards being developed and introduced every year. This rapid growth in standards requires frequent re-categorization to keep up with the dynamic nature of this field. To tackle this problem, this paper explores emerging concepts such as ontological representation and frameworks that offer archives and records management (ARM) professionals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Standardization refers to establishing uniform rules through mutual agreement to ensure consistency. The study of standardization goes beyond the development of individual S&amp;GPG, encompassing their practical application in work settings. Categorizing standards alone may not fully capture their actual use. However, abstraction mechanisms like ontological representations, models and frameworks can demonstrate how these standards have been leveraged. This paper provides illustrative examples rather than an exhaustive list to showcase how these mechanisms have been applied in research projects or as practical tools.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper explores the emerging topic of standardization from the perspective of ontological representations and models or frameworks. In addition, it also contributes to the discussion of the 2022 version of ARMA International’s Information Governance Implementation Model and the 2020 version of the World Bank Group's Records Management Roadmap, providing unique insights into these topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soup du jour – existing and emerging trends in archives and records management standardization\",\"authors\":\"Shadrack Katuu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rmj-08-2023-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to examine the concept of standardization beyond its traditional use in generating and implementing standards and good practice guidelines (S&amp;GPG) by looking at existing and emerging trends.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper utilizes two primary approaches to categorizing S&amp;GPG for better comprehension: categorization based on provenance as well as based on subject matter.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>A significant concern related to categorizing S&amp;GPG based on provenance or subject is the constant proliferation of standards being developed and introduced every year. This rapid growth in standards requires frequent re-categorization to keep up with the dynamic nature of this field. To tackle this problem, this paper explores emerging concepts such as ontological representation and frameworks that offer archives and records management (ARM) professionals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Standardization refers to establishing uniform rules through mutual agreement to ensure consistency. The study of standardization goes beyond the development of individual S&amp;GPG, encompassing their practical application in work settings. Categorizing standards alone may not fully capture their actual use. However, abstraction mechanisms like ontological representations, models and frameworks can demonstrate how these standards have been leveraged. This paper provides illustrative examples rather than an exhaustive list to showcase how these mechanisms have been applied in research projects or as practical tools.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper explores the emerging topic of standardization from the perspective of ontological representations and models or frameworks. In addition, it also contributes to the discussion of the 2022 version of ARMA International’s Information Governance Implementation Model and the 2020 version of the World Bank Group's Records Management Roadmap, providing unique insights into these topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":20923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-08-2023-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-08-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在通过观察现有的和新兴的趋势,研究标准化的概念,超越其在生成和实施标准和良好实践指南(S&GPG)中的传统用途。设计/方法/方法本文采用两种主要方法对S&GPG进行分类,以便更好地理解:基于来源的分类以及基于主题的分类。基于来源或主题对GPG进行分类的一个重要问题是,每年开发和引入的标准不断增加。标准的快速增长需要频繁地重新分类,以跟上该领域的动态特性。为了解决这个问题,本文探讨了一些新兴的概念,例如提供档案和记录管理(ARM)专业人员的本体论表示和框架。实践意义标准化是指通过相互协议建立统一的规则,以确保一致性。标准化的研究超越了个人标准的发展,包括他们在工作环境中的实际应用。单独对标准进行分类可能无法完全捕捉到它们的实际用途。然而,像本体表示、模型和框架这样的抽象机制可以演示如何利用这些标准。本文提供了说明性的例子,而不是详尽的清单,以展示这些机制如何应用于研究项目或作为实用工具。原创性/价值本文从本体论表征和模型或框架的角度探讨了标准化这一新兴话题。此外,它还有助于对2022年版ARMA国际信息治理实施模式和2020年版世界银行集团记录管理路线图的讨论,为这些主题提供独特的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soup du jour – existing and emerging trends in archives and records management standardization

Purpose

This paper aims to examine the concept of standardization beyond its traditional use in generating and implementing standards and good practice guidelines (S&GPG) by looking at existing and emerging trends.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper utilizes two primary approaches to categorizing S&GPG for better comprehension: categorization based on provenance as well as based on subject matter.

Findings

A significant concern related to categorizing S&GPG based on provenance or subject is the constant proliferation of standards being developed and introduced every year. This rapid growth in standards requires frequent re-categorization to keep up with the dynamic nature of this field. To tackle this problem, this paper explores emerging concepts such as ontological representation and frameworks that offer archives and records management (ARM) professionals.

Practical implications

Standardization refers to establishing uniform rules through mutual agreement to ensure consistency. The study of standardization goes beyond the development of individual S&GPG, encompassing their practical application in work settings. Categorizing standards alone may not fully capture their actual use. However, abstraction mechanisms like ontological representations, models and frameworks can demonstrate how these standards have been leveraged. This paper provides illustrative examples rather than an exhaustive list to showcase how these mechanisms have been applied in research projects or as practical tools.

Originality/value

This paper explores the emerging topic of standardization from the perspective of ontological representations and models or frameworks. In addition, it also contributes to the discussion of the 2022 version of ARMA International’s Information Governance Implementation Model and the 2020 version of the World Bank Group's Records Management Roadmap, providing unique insights into these topics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信