考虑雷诺数和湍流效应的低层建筑气动载荷评估综述

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Khaled, Md Faiaz, Aly, Aly Mousaad
{"title":"考虑雷诺数和湍流效应的低层建筑气动载荷评估综述","authors":"Khaled, Md Faiaz, Aly, Aly Mousaad","doi":"10.1186/s42774-022-00114-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an extensive review of existing techniques used in estimating design wind pressures considering Reynolds number and turbulence effects, as well as a case study of a reference building investigated experimentally. We shed light on the limitations of current aerodynamic testing techniques, provisions in design standards, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to predict wind-induced pressures. The paper highlights the reasons for obstructing the standardization of the wind tunnel method. Moreover, we introduce improved experimental and CFD techniques to tackle the identified challenges. CFD provides superior and efficient performance by employing wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) and hybrid RANS-LES models. In addition, we tested a large-scale building model and compared the results with published small-scale data. The findings reinforce our hypothesis concerning the scaling issues and Reynolds number effects in aerodynamic testing.","PeriodicalId":33737,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Aerodynamics","volume":"122 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing aerodynamic loads on low-rise buildings considering Reynolds number and turbulence effects: a review\",\"authors\":\"Khaled, Md Faiaz, Aly, Aly Mousaad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42774-022-00114-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an extensive review of existing techniques used in estimating design wind pressures considering Reynolds number and turbulence effects, as well as a case study of a reference building investigated experimentally. We shed light on the limitations of current aerodynamic testing techniques, provisions in design standards, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to predict wind-induced pressures. The paper highlights the reasons for obstructing the standardization of the wind tunnel method. Moreover, we introduce improved experimental and CFD techniques to tackle the identified challenges. CFD provides superior and efficient performance by employing wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) and hybrid RANS-LES models. In addition, we tested a large-scale building model and compared the results with published small-scale data. The findings reinforce our hypothesis concerning the scaling issues and Reynolds number effects in aerodynamic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"122 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-022-00114-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-022-00114-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文对考虑雷诺数和湍流效应的设计风压估算的现有技术进行了广泛的回顾,并对一个参考建筑进行了实验研究。我们阐明了当前空气动力学测试技术的局限性,设计标准的规定,以及计算流体动力学(CFD)方法来预测风致压力。重点分析了阻碍风洞法标准化的原因。此外,我们引入了改进的实验和CFD技术来解决已确定的挑战。通过采用壁面大涡模拟(WMLES)和混合ranss - les模型,CFD提供了优越而高效的性能。此外,我们测试了一个大尺度的建筑模型,并将结果与已发表的小尺度数据进行了比较。这些发现强化了我们关于气动测试中尺度问题和雷诺数效应的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing aerodynamic loads on low-rise buildings considering Reynolds number and turbulence effects: a review
This paper presents an extensive review of existing techniques used in estimating design wind pressures considering Reynolds number and turbulence effects, as well as a case study of a reference building investigated experimentally. We shed light on the limitations of current aerodynamic testing techniques, provisions in design standards, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to predict wind-induced pressures. The paper highlights the reasons for obstructing the standardization of the wind tunnel method. Moreover, we introduce improved experimental and CFD techniques to tackle the identified challenges. CFD provides superior and efficient performance by employing wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) and hybrid RANS-LES models. In addition, we tested a large-scale building model and compared the results with published small-scale data. The findings reinforce our hypothesis concerning the scaling issues and Reynolds number effects in aerodynamic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信