成人脓毒症或感染性休克患者-受体阻滞剂与临床结局的关系:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Souvik Maitra
{"title":"成人脓毒症或感染性休克患者-受体阻滞剂与临床结局的关系:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Souvik Maitra","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of beta-blockers as a part of heart rate control strategy is sepsis and septic shock patients is of great debate. Despite of early encouraging results, no large trial was performed and several subsequent small studies reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis and systematic review will be conducted and published as per PRISMA guidelines. In this review, randomized controlled trials comparing short-acting beta-blockers with standard of care in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. Primary outcome will be 28- day mortality and secondary outcomes will be duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of hospital stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and reported adverse events. A random effect model will be used for all analysis.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"60 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Beta Blocker and Clinical Outcome in Adult Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Souvik Maitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Use of beta-blockers as a part of heart rate control strategy is sepsis and septic shock patients is of great debate. Despite of early encouraging results, no large trial was performed and several subsequent small studies reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis and systematic review will be conducted and published as per PRISMA guidelines. In this review, randomized controlled trials comparing short-acting beta-blockers with standard of care in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. Primary outcome will be 28- day mortality and secondary outcomes will be duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of hospital stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and reported adverse events. A random effect model will be used for all analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"60 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用受体阻滞剂作为心率控制策略的一部分是脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者是很大的争论。尽管早期的结果令人鼓舞,但没有进行大型试验,随后的几项小型研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。本荟萃分析和系统评价将按照PRISMA指南进行并发表。在本综述中,将纳入比较短效β受体阻滞剂与标准治疗成人脓毒症和感染性休克的随机对照试验。主要结局是28天死亡率,次要结局是重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间、ICU死亡率、住院死亡率和报告的不良事件。所有分析将采用随机效应模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Beta Blocker and Clinical Outcome in Adult Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Use of beta-blockers as a part of heart rate control strategy is sepsis and septic shock patients is of great debate. Despite of early encouraging results, no large trial was performed and several subsequent small studies reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis and systematic review will be conducted and published as per PRISMA guidelines. In this review, randomized controlled trials comparing short-acting beta-blockers with standard of care in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. Primary outcome will be 28- day mortality and secondary outcomes will be duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of hospital stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and reported adverse events. A random effect model will be used for all analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信